Rabbits do "chew the cud".

[Ophiolite]

You are not a scientist. You may go away.

I accept this avoidance of the issue as tacit acknowledgement by you that you lied. It would have enhanced your reputation if you had done so openly, rather than confounding the deceit by adopting this obvious and irrelevant change of subject. ( Bungle Bear's status as a scientist has no bearing on whether or not you lied.)
The damage this behaviour is doing to your integrity is troubling. I urge you to reflect upon that and think more carefully about the accuracy and honesty of future posts that you make.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

As long as a person is more knowledgeable than students, he is a good teacher by default. It is up to the students to learn, but not up the teacher to teach.

Teachers are often trapped between short-sighted administrators and distracted students. Many don't have enough life experience to deal with the kids, or enough power to change the system. And of course in this day and age many teachers carry heavy burdens of personal baggage, and debt, as well. Not a good situation.

 

[juvenissun]

I accept this avoidance of the issue as tacit acknowledgement by you that you lied. It would have enhanced your reputation if you had done so openly, rather than confounding the deceit by adopting this obvious and irrelevant change of subject. ( Bungle Bear's status as a scientist has no bearing on whether or not you lied.)
The damage this behaviour is doing to your integrity is troubling. I urge you to reflect upon that and think more carefully about the accuracy and honesty of future posts that you make.

He made a very ignorant scientific statement.

 

[juvenissun]

Teachers are often trapped between short-sighted administrators and distracted students. Many don't have enough life experience to deal with the kids, or enough power to change the system. And of course in this day and age many teachers carry heavy burdens of personal baggage, and debt, as well. Not a good situation.

Of course, a teacher is also a human who lives in a human society.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

You are not a scientist. You may go away.

Lucky you I'm just getting on a plane. But when I have time I'll post some if your lies.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

He made a very ignorant scientific statement.

That's a lie! I'll sue for defamation!

 

[Kylie]

As compared to ruminant's, no.
For God's purpose, yes.

Just answer the question please and stop trying to weasel out of it.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Just answer the question please and stop trying to weasel out of it.

I gave you the "no" you were seeking.

 

[tas8831]

As compared to ruminant's, no.

135 IQ and you used an apostrophe there?

For God's purpose, yes.

Ah, so you employ the old stand-by double standard when backed into a corner. Classic!

 

[tas8831]

I'm a great teacher, except on the forums.

Unfortunately my students aren't so good at learning what I'm teaching.

Yes, i am sure your Sunday School munchkins gobble up your God talk, but that doesn't work so well with adults who have more relevant education (and much less ego and desperation) than you do.

 

[tas8831]

Relax. You are taking this waaaay too seriously.

So, what was your actual point in starting this thread?

Was it NOT to imply that rabbits really do 'chew the cud'? And was that not to imply that you had 'yet another' proof of bible lore being 100% true?

And now that your folly has been exposed, you are trying to backtrack a bit, and imply that you were not really being serious?

 

[tas8831]

Rabbits eat their own poop

"This process is known as coprophagy, and functions the same as cows chewing their cud."

Not only that but God's formula for pi is correct as well.

Come on, gang! We now know that this was all just a big joke! LOL! Good one, OWG!

 

[OldWiseGuy]

.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

135 IQ and you used an apostrophe there?

I corrected it, just for you.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

So, what was your actual point in starting this thread?

Was it NOT to imply that rabbits really do 'chew the cud'? And was that not to imply that you had 'yet another' proof of bible lore being 100% true?

And now that your folly has been exposed, you are trying to backtrack a bit, and imply that you were not really being serious?

Relax. You're taking this waaaaaay too seriously. (I see that you are ignoring my invitation to debate concerning pi. Curious.)

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

As long as a person is more knowledgeable than students, he is a good teacher by default. It is up to the students to learn, but not up the teacher to teach.

That is a horrendous statement to make and is just down right daft. It is not down to one person or the other.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

And no, rabbits don't chew cud. They chew feces which is very different to cud since cud is regurgitated and feces is defecated.

 

[Kylie]

I gave you the "no" you were seeking.

And you tried to weasel in a yes as well. That was rather intellectually dishonest, wasn't it?

 

[OldWiseGuy]

And you tried to weasel in a yes as well. That was rather intellectually dishonest, wasn't it?

My answer stands.

And you tried to weasel in a yes as well. That was rather intellectually dishonest, wasn't it?

Are you looking for an answer, or an apology?

 

[Kylie]

My answer stands.

Yeah, we all saw your answer where you tried to get around it bny saying both yes and no. No one was fooled.

Are you looking for an answer, or an apology?

I'm looking for you to actually think for yourself and not try to have it both ways just because you can't deal with the cognitive dissonance.