I wish you had been more clear about that. Thanks for clarifying now. The Council of Trent DID reform some of the pious excesses of earlier medieval speculation about purgatory. In fact the teaching is actually quite minimalist. They said there IS a place or state of purgation and those being purged are helped by our prayers. Period. Pretty simple.
Forgive me, i thought I was clear, since I expressly praised the Council of Trent and also declared my view that Pope St. Pius V was the first Pope (that I am aware of, at least) worthy of holding the office since some time prior to the Great Schism. It is possible there were other good Popes, but their status is obscure, whereas after St. Pius V I can think of a number of Popes worthy of veneration, especially St. Pius X and St. John Paul II, and also I feel that Pope Benedict XVI is immediately venerable. Orthodoxy lacks the formal process of canonization when it comes to declaring saints to have been glorified, which is why all martyrs instantly become venerable saints in the Orthodox Church.
Obviously if Trent had maintained a doctrine of Purgatory that I rejected I would have not praised it on that ground.
The only things that happened in the Counter-Reformation that I disagree with (aside from my concerns about some aspects of the Jesuit Order, although I can think of several Jesuits that I greatly admire and who might well be worthy of veneration, for example, Fr. Robert Taft, SJ, memory eternal) is include the canon suppressing rites less than 200 years old which was, in my view, needless (and the problems caused by the 17th century Jansenist “Gallican” liturgy not to be confused with the ancient Gallican Rite, which could have been suppressed without requiring a general canon, although conversely one could argue this Tridentine canon along with certain other statements accompanying the Missal of St. Paul V make the
Novus Ordo Missae uncanonical, and many have in fact made those arguments) , and resulted in liturgical damage, particularly when churches that used regional uses that were older than 200 years old and thus still canonical, ceased doing so, and additionally, there was the matter of the Rood Screens, which the Franciscans and Dominicans campaigned against, and never included in their own churches, and as a result many of these historic works of art, which are the Western version of the Eastern Iconostasis, and which I feel should be installed in every new and refurbished Western church, just as the Iconostasis should be in every Eastern Orthodox and Coptic Orthodox church, every Armenian church should have the icon-painted Bema and Curtain, and Syriac, Aramaic, Maronite and Ethiopian Orthodox churches should use the curtains and iconostasis-like decoration of the partition between the Apse and the Nave.
Likewise I suppose my main objection to the actual decisions of Vatican II (as opposed to the botched implementation of
Sacrosanctum Concilium by the group lead by Annibale Bugnini, confusingly called the Concilium, but not actually appointed by or under the control of Vatican II), was the decision to suppress the ancient liturgical office of Prime.