Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
CynicalAgnostic said:Until you can prove that God himself considers a fetus to be a child
God loves everybody. Sure He does not see everyone as His Son, for none are except Jesus and whosoever should recieve His Life. He desires only good things for mankind, which is why He sent His Son to rescue us from ourselves and from the clutches of the enemy.CynicalAgnostic said:and holds pro-life morals
CynicalAgnostic said:you have no right to imply that he does. People do that sort of thing all too often these days: assuming that their deity holds the exact same morals that they do and twisting around verses from their holy book in order to "prove it."
I would think so too, I would also be so bold as to put ignorance up there on that list as well-hehCynicalAgnostic said:Frankly, I think that, if there is a God, he's more [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]ed with the people who misrepresent his word than the people who go against it just because they have no reason to think that the deity will be angry at them for doing so. Of course not
I'm not here to reason with you, God is there for you. I am contending for my brother however, and the mistrepresentation of the Lord's Name he has blatently put forth in front of unbelievers.CynicalAgnostic said:But until you can show me a Bible verse that explicitly states that the killing of an unborn child through medical means is wrong and bad, I will have no reason to think that your god believes such is true.
In actuality anyone can and will twist Scripture to suite thier motive as long as they are walking after the flesh..CynicalAgnostic said:Sorry. I guess I didn't word that clearly enough (which makes sense, since it's currently 3:08 AM where I am and I'm half-asleep). What I meant to say was that the KKK twists Bible verses around just as much as pro-lifers do.

Oh my! It's nearly time for me to wake up! :LOL:CynicalAgnostic said:**I'm going to go to bed now, but I'll reply to your next reply (assuming that you read this post before you yourself head off to bed) after I wake up. Have a good night.**
Zeena said:Babies breath in womb the breath of God,
I'm not better, but JESUS is, and He Lives in me!I must say, Zeena, you're coming off awfully troll-like with that statement '[which, btw, is not true, as Christians we (may) sin, but are saints]' - and it contradicts everything I've ever heard a Christian say. You are mortal like any other, no better than the rest; and every Christian I've spoken to has claimed that they are no better. They sin and err like any other man, and seek salvation. They are not 'better', they just claim to know who to ask for help.

The very last paragraph explains that babies do indeed intake oxygen.The article linked to this phrase says that babies don't "breathe" in-utero.
They breath, and Life is in the breath!None of the verses you posted state that God views fetuses as human beings. The ONLY verse that remotely pertains to how God views fetuses is the Jeremiah 1:5 verse, and that is clearly referring to the fact that God knows all, past and future, and has destined those of us to be what we're destined to be long before we were born.
The very last paragraph explains that babies do indeed intake oxygen.
Where do the Scriptures state that they are humans? I'm not asking if fetuses are alive; I'm asking where the Scriptures say/imply that fetuses are human beings.They breath, and Life is in the breath!
[As SCRIPTURALLY backed by my initial rebut]
Genesis 7:15
And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life.
Ezekiel 37:6
And I will lay sinews upon you, and will bring up flesh upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and ye shall live; and ye shall know that I am the LORD.
Ok, here the exact referance from that article.Yes, but you originally said "breath" (or perhaps meant "breathe"?). And I pointed out that babies don't breathe, as that article pointed out.
All oxygenated blood is being provided by mom and
sent through the umbilical cord.
What, did you think they were some sort of alien or somthing?!? Get real? Now you're telling me as a Christian you don't believe in human nature? Jeremiah spoke of it when he said he was sinful from the wombWhere do the Scriptures state that they are humans? I'm not asking if fetuses are alive; I'm asking where the Scriptures say/imply that fetuses are human beings.
Isaiah 49:15
Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee.
Asking what, that human thing? Tis the first time I've heard it issue from your being.. To say a human being is something other than a human being is just.. just.. well it just ain't right to think of a child as something other than human! Unless of course you think we all come from apes, well then, that might be reason to think otherwise..I'm getting rather tired of asking this, by the way, and if you don't actually give me a clear answer in your next post or two, I'm going to put you on my ignore list.
Leviticus 24:17
"If anyone takes the life of a human being, he must be put to death."
Lamentations 3:13
He pierced my heart with arrows from his quiver.
Luke 2:35
(Yea, a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also,) that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.
What, did you think they were some sort of alien or somthing?!? Get real?
I said nothing of the sort; don't strawman. I don't believe that human nature begins until the baby is born and thus begins its life as a human.Now you're telling me as a Christian you don't believe in human nature?
That verse says "Son of the womb." It also says, " Can a woman forget her sucking child?" Clearly it's referring to the time after the son is born, because I don't know of too many suckling fetuses.As well, God does say here that we are sons of our mothers from the womb;
I agree. Luckily, I'm not doing that; I'm thinking of a fetus as something other than a human.To say a human being is something other than a human being is just.. just.. well it just ain't right to think of a child as something other than human!
Nobody believe we "came from apes"; a lot of people do think we shared a common ancestor with apes.Unless of course you think we all come from apes, well then, that might be reason to think otherwise..
Go ahead, run away from the truth, but He'll catch you!
It means the fetus is breathing through MomThat means mom is breathing, not the fetus.
I did for the most part, I was merely speaking with my brother in that last regard.You've provided scripture that doesn't deal with fetuses, abortion, or even pregnancy... I don't see how that's "truth."
It means the fetus is breathing through Mom![]()
Just like a tree breathes through it's leaves![]()
I have shown how, SCRIPTURAL definition of Life consists of breath, and that babies do recive that Life, from God!
\I never had intention of playing some sort of game where I post by your, nor anyone elses rules.
[quote[Asking what, that human thing? Tis the first time I've heard it issue from your being.
No, no it really doesn't. It means that the fetus is taking oxygen in through its umbilical cord, but its lungs aren't working. For it to be "breathing," your lungs have to be involved.
No, it means the fetus is gaining oxygen through its mother, much like tapeworms gain oxygen from their hosts. The action of breathing by the fetus is not possible during the first trimester, since its lungs are nowhere near developed enough for that act.It means the fetus is breathing through Mom
That action might be called "respiration" but, since it does not involve lungs, it does not fit the definition of breathing.
So, since trees can respirate as well, is it safe to say that God wouldn't want us humans to cut them down like we are? Or what about cows? They breathe, too. Yet I don't see all that many Christians who are opposed to eating beef. What makes one form of life okay to kill, but another not?I have shown how, Medically & SCRIPTURALLY that Life consists of breath, and that babies do recive that Life, from God!
Oh, so you'd actually say that trees breathe, then? You'd say to your friends "Hmm...that tree doesn't look like it's breathing quite enough?" Maybe it's just me, but that doesn't quite sound right. Let's look at the definition of the word "breathe":For breathing your lungs do not have to involved!
http://www.elmcare.com/trees/how_trees_breathe.htm
Did you even read the link I supplied the the post you quoted?
It's from a MEDICAL SOCIETY! :LOL:
I don't see how a first-trimester fetus (or a tree, for that matter) can breathe according to that definition. Do you?Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary said:
Would you ignore a dictionary definition to suit your cause? Plus, doctors don't know everything. How else would you explain all of the medical malpractice suits in the US today? I, for one, would trust a dictionary over a doctor any day. But that's just me.It's medically backed, and would you ignore the fact to suite your call?
Answers.com is not a reputable dictionary, in my opinion. Otherwise, it would have a published book version of its definitions.