• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Poll - Once Saved Always Saved

Do you believe in the doctrine of Once Saved, Always Saved?

  • No, I don't believe in the doctrine of Once Saved Always Saved.

  • Yes, I do believe in the doctrine of Once Saved Always Saved.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ben johnson

Legend
Site Supporter
Feb 9, 2002
16,916
404
Oklahoma
Visit site
✟99,049.00
Faith
Christian
In Lk13:3 (5) Jesus said: "Unless you repent, you will perish."

Is that statement true?
NBF said:
Since according to you, anyone practicing sin is not saved, how many times now have you been saved? How many times have you lost your salvation? How many times have you practiced sin?
There is a vast difference between "sinning" and "practicing sinning".

Practicing, is continual, and absent repentance.

I received Jesus as Lord and Savior in 1980; yet I still did things that are not compatible with "saved". There was a time (especially one incident), when if I had died, I have no doubt I would have perished.

But "anecdotes" do not set policy; policy is set in passages like Rom11:21-23, where we're told it is arrogant to think we can NOT fall. We stand by faith, they fell by unbelief. If they fell (natural branches), we can ALSO be cut off, if we do not CONTINUE in faith. ANd if they do not continue in unbelief, they can be grafted in again.

That's "policy"; clear and concise.

 
Upvote 0

Dispy

Veteran
Jan 16, 2004
2,551
32
93
South Dakota
✟4,680.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Part 1

Dispy said:
Originally Posted by Dispy A believer that "walks in the flesh" is demonstrating his works.

Ben johnson said:
Hi, Dispy. In my understanding, there is no such thing as "a believer who walks in the flesh". By definition, one who believes and receives Jesus, walks in Him; he who does not walk in Christ (but in sins), does not really believe.

Well, I highly recomment that you read the book of 1 Corinthians. Paul calls the believers there carnal, and the abuse the partaking of the Lord's Supper (1 Cor. 10:16-22.) Even 1 Cor. 5:1 "Ti is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father's wife."

Paul is writeing to believers "Unto the church of God which is at Corinth to them that are sanctified in Chirst Jesus, CALLED TO BE SAINTS...." (1 Cor. 1:2).

I would consider those Corinthian believers saints that still have the old sin nature within them, and still able to walk in the flesh.
Ben johnson said:
I believe that passage connects to 1Pet1:6-7, where the "fire of trials" refines us (as fire refines gold). "Saved through fire", to me conveys "taught to produce better works".

Paul in 1 Cor. is writeing to members of the Chruch, the Body of Christ, saved under the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began," i.e the Gospel of the Grace of God. Peter is writeing to believers that were saved under the preaching of "the gospel of the kingdom." There is no connection to the two passages. It is two different Apostles writeing to two diffferent peoples that were saved under two different gospels.

Dispy said:
You said in another post: "Because salvation is forfeitable." Well, if it is, then I never received salvation (eternal life), but placed on probation until the day I die, or am raptured.

..

I have placed my FAITH ALONE (belived) in the Cross work of Christ for my salvation. Therefore, according to Eph. 1:13-14, I am sealed by the holy Spirit of promis until the redemption of the purchased possession. (My salvation was purchased by the blood of Christ.) Isn't that a contradiction of what you believe. What is your take on Eph. 1:12-14?



Every person is given the free will to either accept the free gift of salvation, or reject it. According to Romans 12:3, every man is given "a measure of faith." Therefore, all thost that place their FAITH in the Cross work of Christ for their salvation, they are placed into the Body of Christ, and become a member of His flesh and of His bones. Further, I am sealed until the day of my redemption. Everyone that places their faith in some other means will not be saved. Yes, we make the decision of either accepting or rejection that free gift of salvation.

Dispy said:
How are you "receiving what he did?

Ben johnson said:
By faith. My faith. And in Him I dwell, by faith. His power, my belief; His might, my diligence. His righteousness, my conscious submission to Him.

Tell me, do you still give in to the desires of your flesh? Or, do you never commit a sin?


Ben johnson said:
Do you hold to this?

NO!!!


Ben johnson said:
Please read the context of ch8 --- it's the answer to the problem in ch7. And Paul clearly presents "walking in the Spirit, or walking in the flesh", as possible.

What is the consequence of walking in the flesh? Verse 8:12-14.

Paul in verse 11 says: "But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.

12 Therefore, brethren we are debtors, not o the flesh, to live after the flesh,

13 For it ye live after the flesh (reject the gift of salvaltion), ye shall die; but if ye through the Sirit do mortify (put to death) the deeds of the body, shall live.

14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God."

The Apostle Paul, you and I, still have the old sin nature within us and, like Paul will do things we know we shouldn't do. As Paul says in Romans ;7:18 that in me (that is, in my flesh) dwelleth no good thing. So, do you thing that Paul is unsaved being in his flesh dwelleth no good theing?

Dispy said:
Paul wrote the above and is the same Paul that wrote Ephesians 1:12-14. He is not contradicting himself.

Ben johnson said:
No, he doesn't; but if what Paul says contradicts my doctrine, or your doctrine, then we will do well to re-examine our positions.

Dispy said:
To this I can agree.

He doesn't contradict my doctrine, and being you disagree with me, then maybe you should re-examing your position.

Dispy said:
Yes, The price Christ paid on the Corss was sufficient and complete. He paid the sin debt for all mankind. Therefore, no one will every stand before God and be judged according to their sins.

Ben johnson said:
I think you're missing the fact that sins are not forgiven, without repentance. As Jesus said in Lk13:3, "Unless you REPENT, you will perish".

Tell me now, What sins didn't Jesus die for?

While Jesus ministered upon the earth, the unbelievers were the ones that didn't believe that He was the long promised Messiah of Israel. Those that believed on Him (changed their view as to who He was) earned eternal life. Repent just means to have a change of mind/turn around/change one's way of life/show remorse for wrong doing.

Dispy said:
At the Judgment Seat of Christ (1 Cor. 1:3-15) and The Great White Throne judgment (Rev. 20:11-15) man will be judged "according to their works." Works of the flesh (sin) will be given their just reward, and cast into the fire.

Ben johnson said:
The WORKS will be cast into the fire, but the people will NOT?

They will. Rev20:12&15 is clear; he who has sinful works, is also he who is not written in the Book of Life; he is cast into the fire.

My bad in stating it badly, The workers will be cast into the lake of fire.



There is nothing I can do to add to my salvation. Jesus Chrst did it all. Anything I do to add to my salvation ie practicing religion. FAITH ALONE in the Cross work of Christ is all that is needed for salvation. We are saved UNTO good works (Eph. 2:10).

The moment one places their FAITH ALONE in the Cross work of Christ for their salvation, the Holy Spirit baptizes that one into the Body of Christ. Further, the Holy Spirit of God will indwell that person from that moment on. One will never have more, or less, of the Holy Spirit then at the moment of salvation.

Dispy said:
I have considered every thing you posted, and replied to all of it.

I do believe that the "imperishable wreath" is eternal life.

Ben johnson said:
I'm very pleased.

Dispy said:
It is something we as believers strive for and will receive at the Judgment Seat of Christ. The more of our works that survive the test of fire, greater will be that "imperishable wreath" (crown of glory).


If you have ever entered, or observed, a foot race, you will notice that there is always someone that will finish last. One will not find that one upon the platform to receive the victors medal/reward, however, that one had still completed by running the race. At the Judgment seat of Christ, all those believers who's works did not pass the test of fire; will lose rewards, but still be saved.

to be continued.
 
Upvote 0

Dispy

Veteran
Jan 16, 2004
2,551
32
93
South Dakota
✟4,680.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Part 2

Dispy said:
Col. 2:6-7 are excellent instructions for members of the Church, the Body of Christ. Verse 8 is a warning to those believers to be very careful of friends of satan.

Ben johnson said:
Be careful, why? Explicitly stated, to "not be taken captive by worldly philosophy, rather than according to Christ".

If someone is taken-captive away from Christ, is he still saved?

Are you saying that someone broke the seal? A person that is saved can still fall prey to a false doctrine. That is why Paul instructs us to be Bereans, and to study the Word daily to see if those things are true (Acts 17:11).


Ben johnson said:
He's writing to the "chosen lady [/b]and her children".[/b] Gotta mean "us"
.
Being Israel is "the Bride of Christ," I must assume that you are referring to Israel as the "chosen lady." I am not a Jew or spiritual Jew. 2 John is not written to me as a member of the Body of Christ.[/QUOTE]


Ben johnson said:
Under the New Covenant, there is neither "Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female; we are all one in Christ Jesus." Gal3:26 I do not perceive James' or Peter's letters, to align with anything else.

The New Covenant is with the house of Israel and the house of Judah (Jer. 31:31, Heb. 8:8). The Body of Christ is not in that covenant. Those that Peter, James and John are writeing to have an earthly kingdom to look forward to, whereas members of the Body of Christ, that Paul is writeing to in Gal. 3:26, have a heavenly hope/home to look forwrd to.



As I have stated previously, there are things written to those in the general epistles by Peter, James, and John, that are as applicable to us in the Body of Christ, as it is to the ones they are addressing.

The instructions in righteous for the children of Israel was given by God to Moses. The instructions in righteousness for members of the Church, the Body of Christ, were given by God to Paul. It appears to me that you are mixing the instructions in righteousness that God gave to Moses for the children of Israel, with the instructions in righteousness that God gave to Paul for members of the Chruch, the Body of Christ. It is my contention that doing that, it only leads to confusion and denominations. It is what I call "a scrambled egg doctrine." Moses preached the Law, Paul preached Grace. Two opposing doctrines.
 
Upvote 0

Ormly

Senior Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
6,230
94
✟7,151.00
Faith
Christian

That is conjecture. It also has nothing to do with Job not being in need of salvation but only redemption. Please srick to the issue and lets not get side tracked.

Can't you agree he only needed redeeming? BeHe apparently has. He at least has run out of mis-leading questions.
 
Upvote 0

A Brother In Christ

Senior Veteran
Mar 30, 2005
5,528
53
Royal city, washington
✟5,985.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We're speaking of redemption, not salvation. Job didn't need saving and he knew his redeemer lived.

YEs ... because the Son of God walked with him in physical form!

Jesus Christ was not born yet


Job was given a promise from God and Job believed that God word would be fulfilled in the future..
 
Upvote 0

A Brother In Christ

Senior Veteran
Mar 30, 2005
5,528
53
Royal city, washington
✟5,985.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In Lk13:3 (5) Jesus said: "Unless you repent, you will perish."
unsaved people need to repent of their unbelief.... jn 16:7-11


Of sin because they believe not on me[JC]... jn 16:9

of righteousness, because I go to the Father and see me no more... john 16:10

of judgement because the prince of this world is judged.. jn 16:11

the comforter.. aka H.S. job is this!




Matt 18:21 -22 please answer this

why is a brother still a brother if cased into hell after 2nd time?
 
Upvote 0

AndOne

Deliver me oh Lord, from evil men
Apr 20, 2002
7,477
462
Florida
✟28,628.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Can't you agree he only needed redeeming? BeHe apparently has. He at least has run out of mis-leading questions.

I don't agree.

I'm only trying to understand what it is exactly what you believe - nothing more. No offense - I still don't understand.

This concept of redemption being seperate from salvation is hard to grasp. I don't see it in scripture.

Please do not make erronious assumptions or needless accusations that aren't necessary to the discussion.
 
Upvote 0

Ormly

Senior Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
6,230
94
✟7,151.00
Faith
Christian

Then address my answers as to whether they are correct without asking more questions with the hope of tripping me up with one of them, Ok? It was all too obvious however, you asked for scripture, try this:

"I tell you, in the same way, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over 99 righteous people who don’t need repentance."Luke 15:7 (HCSB)

Disagree with Jesus..
 
Upvote 0

AndOne

Deliver me oh Lord, from evil men
Apr 20, 2002
7,477
462
Florida
✟28,628.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
"I tell you, in the same way, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over 99 righteous people who don’t need repentance."Luke 15:7 (HCSB)

Disagree with Jesus..

I believe Jesus was responding to the pharisees who grumbled in verse 1. Are you saying that the pharisees who grumbled were righteous?

The point of the parable (which starts at vs 2) is to show the need for us to repent - not to show that their is a seperation between redemption and salvation.
 
Upvote 0

Ormly

Senior Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
6,230
94
✟7,151.00
Faith
Christian
 
Upvote 0

AndOne

Deliver me oh Lord, from evil men
Apr 20, 2002
7,477
462
Florida
✟28,628.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Jesus would never be alluding to them as being righteous. So again, stop trying to get me to say what I am not. Let the passage speak for itself.

I am just disagreeing with you - I am not trying to get you to say anything. I am also trying to look at verse 7 in context to the whole passage - not just the verse alone away from the others. The passage is not just verse 7 - it starts at verse 1.

What makes you think it is a parable? Who is us? Certainly if you are unjust, you need to repent.

I was referring to the entire text - not just verse 7. Jesus was referring to those who THINK they are righteous - like the pharisees.

Apparently you must think you are.

This is just a totally unnecessary comment meant to bait me into another needless and useless bantering session. It just isn't productive or necessary to the conversation - please refrain from these comments. I would greatly appreciate it.
 
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟41,809.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Jesus would never be alluding to them as being righteous.
Agreed, no reason to assume He did so here. But is that His central point?
So again, stop trying to get me to say what I am not.
I remember Behe's comment about erroneous accusations. This is one.
Let the passage speak for itself.
BB / ABIC have let the passage speak for itself. Now we're discussing why you think something is significant to your view about this passage.
What makes you think it is a parable? Who is us?
"So he told them this parable" ... Lk 15:3
Certainly if you are unjust, you need to repent. Apparently you must think you are.
The passage refers to some who are righteous. Certainly they have no need to repent: an interesting assertion of Jesus' on its own. Though not something I'd assert for His hearers, I suspect their own righteousness is a presumption on the part of many of His hearers.

Jesus' point in teaching is constantly to use the assumption of His students, state an acceptable attribute of the Kingdom in a parable, turn the assumptions of His students into an inconsistency, and then require change.

What's the inconsistency Jesus is pointing out? "I need no repentance"? Or "God is happier with people who need no repentance"? Jesus' explicit moral to the parable is stated to be the latter. He's ultimately left the former issue unaddressed in this round. People could still be safe in this parable assuming they were righteous. That's left for other lessons to search out.
 
Upvote 0

Ormly

Senior Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
6,230
94
✟7,151.00
Faith
Christian
 
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟41,809.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Jesus wasn't referring to anyone who thought they were anything.
His audience includes Pharisees:
Now the tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to hear him. And the Pharisees and the scribes grumbled, saying, "This man receives sinners and eats with them." So he told them this parable Lk 15:2-3
Pretty plain and should not be mis-construed just because it doesn't line up with your, "none are righteous, no not one," indoctrination which you now find yourself defensless.
And Jesus said to him, "Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone." Lk 18:9
Quit whining and address what is being stated by Jesus without attempting to put a spin on it. I am not your enemy, you are.
Pot calls kettle black. "stop trying to get me to say what I am not." Quit whining and address what is being stated by Jesus without attempting to put a spin on it. I am not your enemy, you are.
 
Upvote 0

Ormly

Senior Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
6,230
94
✟7,151.00
Faith
Christian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormly
Jesus would never be alluding to them as being righteous.

Agreed, no reason to assume He did so here. But is that His central point?

His central point is self-evident.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormly
So again, stop trying to get me to say what I am not.

I remember Behe's comment about erroneous accusations. This is one.

You haven’t been answering his “twenty questions” asked without acknowledging answers given. He isn't looking for truth.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormly
Let the passage speak for itself.

BB / ABIC have let the passage speak for itself. Now we're discussing why you think something is significant to your view about this passage.

The significant difference I see between redemption and salvation and who needs what.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormly
What makes you think it is a parable? Who is us?

"So he told them this parable" ... Lk 15:3

The parable ended in verse 6. [words do mean something, pay attention]



The passage refers to “those who are”, not “some”.

Jesus' point in teaching is constantly to use the assumption of His students, state an acceptable attribute of the Kingdom in a parable, turn the assumptions of His students into an inconsistency, and then require change.

Wonderful!


None of the above. He expounded on what the facts are concerning righteous men who need not salvation and one who does.. Pretty simple if you let it say what it sez and not get bogged down in defending religion.
[/quote]
 
Upvote 0

Ormly

Senior Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
6,230
94
✟7,151.00
Faith
Christian

You shouldn't have ignored post 755
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.