- Oct 12, 2020
- 8,545
- 2,840
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
You are the one who doesn't get it in this case. The argument being made isn't that the thousand years refers to all years as if the word "thousand" equates to "all". The argument is that the word thousand refers to an undefined number of generations in Deuteronomy 7:9. Yes, it was pointed out that the thousand generations refers to all generations, but the point is not to say that the word thousand is used figuratively for "all". The point is that it's used figuratively to describe an undefined number rather than a literal thousand. And that is the case for Revelation 20 as well.Look at your argument, though. Let's see you apply that the same way to the thousand years, that it means all years the same way that a thousand generations mean all generations. A thousand years could never mean all years and you know it. The thousand years have a beginning and an ending, therefore using an example involving generations is not comparable to something involving years in the same way.
How many years has there been thus far, meaning since the beginning of time? Are the thousand years meaning everyone of those years since the beginning of time? Of course not.
The only way to reasonably prove that a thousand years are not meaning a literal thousand years is by providing examples from the OT and NT where a number is followed by years, and that it is not literally meaning the amount of years specified, thus proving when a number is followed by years, it is not always literally meaning the amount of years specified. When are any of you ever going to get around to doing that? You are comparing to things not comparable, not to things comparable. While a thousand generations can mean all generations, and a thousand hills can mean every single hill, a thousand years can never mean every single year. But I suspect some of you still don't get it.
I don't find your argument regarding your man-made rule that a number preceding the word "years" has to be literal to be convincing, either.
I've pointed out to you before how numbers that come before the word "generations" in scripture are always literal except when it talks about "a thousand generations". So, does that mean the references to "a thousand generations" has to be literal, too? According to your logic, it does.
Upvote
0