- Feb 11, 2004
- 19,359
- 3,426
- Faith
- Pagan
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
- Politics
- UK-Greens
Speak for yourself.dlamberth, wonder just one thing about you and that is we know all of us have sinned and need a Saviour.
I do not perceive any of us as "perfect" when measured against an ideal that would necessitate us to make correct decisions in every conceivable circumstance, but I do not perceive our errors and character flaws as supernatural stains - I see them as learning experiences and a potential for personal growth, like a child stumbling while learning to walk.
In this, I concur with the Buddhists: our failures are not metaphysical marks of damnation as much as they are "unskilled behaviour", stemming from ill judgments, false conclusions or unreflected, unconscious desires.
If there is any spiritual weight to our shortcomings, it lies entirely in our ability to realize them as such, and to strive towards becoming all that we could be.
And here is where your faith strays right into monstrosity. You basically claim that the best way to deal with the mistakes you have committed is to point at another, innocent party and say: "Let HIM be punished for them." Even within the context of Christianity, I find that to be a disgusting travesty of what the Cross can actually signify, reducing its message to a despicable trade that adds the ultimate sin to those who take it: not acknowledging responsibility for your own errors, but just deflecting it upon another.So who did you go to for your substitute in your place to atone for the sins that you have committed.
There is a reason why scapegoating has gained such negative connotations in colloquial usage: it is a psychological mechanism that does not eliminate guilt, but merely seeks to place it in another, innocent party.
Upvote
0