Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
He did not confirm that verse. You need to show that the fact that we are evolved beings somehow implies a "falling away".
Not really.
After we go over why we know that there was no Noah's Ark I would be glad to.
It appears that all you can claim is that you believe it was a local flood because if you try hard enough the story can be interpreted that way. That's okay with me. I need to ask a few more questions. Do you believe that Noah's family were the only humans left after the flood?
Not yet. Because it is not a "falling away." Most of those denominations I mentioned have "denied the Bible" all the way back to their inception in the earliest centuries of the Christian era.
Then what should we make of your claim that the chart you posted shows chimps are half as intelligent as humans?
Umm, are you not aware of the fact that animals are put down for attacking humans?
I've already refuted your claim about intelligence by showing at least two different articles showing how it is possible for intelligence to evolve. The fact that you reject that is due to your personal bias against anything that disagrees with your fanciful claims.
Your idea that descent with modification within kinds, is true but I hate your use of the nasty word evolution to describe this process. Please correct your thinking. We are NOT evolved beings but instead, are the descendants, within the Human and prehistoric kind, of the common ancestor of Humans, Adam.
Sorry, you already failed. You do not know how science works. You do not understand the Bible either. You can't refute anything.Please, please tell me. I've waited on something from you for a long time. Try out your theory that "there is no Noah's Ark" on me. I will be happy to refute it for you so you can tell everyone another way to prove it wrong.
In the encephalization chart you are correct....BUT no amount of magical time and zillions of mutations can produce a single Human, since Human intelligence MUST be INHERITED from Adam, the common ancestor of ALL Humankind.
Nothing in that passage tells me that denying the unscholarly and theologically unsatisfactory interpretation of scripture of some Protestant sect is "denying the power thereof."Is denying the Bible "denying the power thereof" as this verse shows:
2Ti 3:1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2Ti 3:2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 2Ti 3:3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, 2Ti 3:4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; 2Ti 3:5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
BTW, We live TODAY at Gen 1:27 because God is STILL creating sinners in His Image which is Spiritually in Christ. This means that it has been the LAST Day/Age in the creation of the perfect Heaven since Jesus made the beasts of the Earth and birds and Adam named them. Gen 2:19 Genesis 1:28-31 is prophecy of events which happen AFTER Jesus returns at Armageddon.
According to Genesis 3:22 Adam was not created with "intelligence" but gained it when he and Eve ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Could you please make up your mind about what you're trying to claim?
Nothing in that passage tells me that denying the unscholarly and theologically unsatisfactory interpretation of scripture of some Protestant sect is "denying the power thereof."
I don't think he's getting the sarcasm.
Your denial was that there was no Creator. Want to try again?
That's a lie. I have never denied the Creator. All that I deny--along with a majority of the world's Christians, now and throughout the past--is your interpretation of the Bible.Your denial was that there was no Creator. Want to try again?
That's a lie. I have never denied the Creator. All that I deny--along with a majority of the world's Christians, now and throughout the past--is your interpretation of the Bible.
That's a lie. I have never denied the Creator. All that I deny--along with a majority of the world's Christians, now and throughout the past--is your interpretation of the Bible.
I am an Anglican. My beliefs are succinctly set forth in the Nicene Creed, which I swear to in public at least weekly. I believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God, but in order to be a creationist I would have to believe that it is also the literal, inerrant, perspicuous and self-interpreting product of Plenary Verbal Inspiration. I would have to believe Sola Scriptura, which is anathema to me. In short, I would have to be a conservative fundamentalist Evangelical Protestant, which I would be embarrassed to have to confess to Christ.↑
>>>>>>>>>>Aman:>>Blasphemy. I predict you will claim that you were always a Creationist....at the Judgment. God Bless you
Speedwell:>.I don't know; I would be ashamed to stand before Christ and tell Him I was a creationist.<<<<<<<<
If not a creationist, what are you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?