Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Interesting explanation. Do you think that the church should still teach the law? Why or why not?
I do
ISAIAH 8 [16] Bind up the testimony, seal the law among my disciples.[17] And I WILL WAIT UPON THE LORD, that hideth his face from the house of Jacob, and I will look for him.[18] Behold, I and the children whom the LORD hath given me are for signs and for wonders in Israel from the LORD of hosts, which dwelleth in mount Zion.[19] And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead?[20] TO THE LAW AND TO THE TESTIMONY: IF THEY SPEAK NOT ACCORDING TO THIS WORD, IT IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO LIGHT IN THEM.
Moral law is not the essence of the Sinai convenient. Mosaic law is sacrificial, not moral.Some will say that the law says to love God and your neighbour, is this done away they ask?
Telling a sinner that they must love God and their neighbour, does not give them the power to do so. It simply condemns them when they are not in that. It is like the sinful young men walking along seeing the glass house and it has the sign, "dont throw stones at this house or you will go to jail, you must be loving to me" that still will not make them loving. That law still will only expose their sin.
But the believers is in that love and needs no sign. God in Him teaches him to love.
The early Christians studied the Scriptures, and by that we know it means the Law and the Prophets. Why should we be any different?Interesting explanation. Do you think that the church should still teach the law? Why or why not?
"what matters is KEEPING the Commandments of God" 1 Cor 7:19Dear posters,
There is a perpetuating rumour around at certain sub-forums that Christians are lawless. The impression being given is that Christians believe that laws of God (all of them) are done away with and that Christians believe that no one is bound to any laws of God given before the Cross.
While I am pretty convinced that Christians still believe in the use of at least the Two Great Laws and teach the Ten as having a very firm place in theology, the accusation leveled at Christians is that they are no longer believed as binding.
So what is it? Is the law done away with entirely? Are you a bunch of antinomians, drooling after your lusts in a blind haze of licentiousness? Or are you confident that you can live by the Spirit and those commandments are guidelines for those who don't yet have the Spirit? Have you another view?
Or what?
The temple will be rebuilt, and with it will come the return of sacrifices.
All true Christians are not without law to God. But the law we are in is the law of Christ , the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus,
And as Heb 8:6-10 tells us - the TEN Commandments are Christ's Commandments.
Not at all. The Christian heart has been changed and following the leading of the Holy Spirit isnt following to do with the law. Gal 3:18Dear posters,
There is a perpetuating rumour around at certain sub-forums that Christians are lawless. The impression being given is that Christians believe that laws of God (all of them) are done away with and that Christians believe that no one is bound to any laws of God given before the Cross.
While I am pretty convinced that Christians still believe in the use of at least the Two Great Laws and teach the Ten as having a very firm place in theology, the accusation leveled at Christians is that they are no longer believed as binding.
So what is it? Is the law done away with entirely? Are you a bunch of antinomians, drooling after your lusts in a blind haze of licentiousness? Or are you confident that you can live by the Spirit and those commandments are guidelines for those who don't yet have the Spirit? Have you another view?
Or what?
Then you must be saying those who aren't law observant aren't Christians. Coincidence isn't obedience nor observance.Yes, people do confuse the issue.
We are under the law in the sense that it is God's will for us, he wants us to be obedient, and if we love Christ, we will have a desire to keep the law. We can not be perfect in this life, but we should be showing signs of improvement day by day.
However, if you are Christian, you are no longer under the condemnation of the law. Keeping or not keeping the law is not what we are going to be judge by in so far as our salvation goes. You will be judged by Christ, in so far as your Heavenly rewards go, according to your behavior, but you are still saved from God's eternal wrath.
You are generally correct. It's the intent of observance that is at issue. It's the difference between trying to be observant to please Christ as opposed to pleasing men.Then you must be saying those who aren't law observant aren't Christians. Coincidence isn't obedience nor observance.
bugkiller
Dear posters,
There is a perpetuating rumour around at certain sub-forums that Christians are lawless. The impression being given is that Christians believe that laws of God (all of them) are done away with and that Christians believe that no one is bound to any laws of God given before the Cross.
While I am pretty convinced that Christians still believe in the use of at least the Two Great Laws and teach the Ten as having a very firm place in theology, the accusation leveled at Christians is that they are no longer believed as binding.
So what is it? Is the law done away with entirely? Are you a bunch of antinomians, drooling after your lusts in a blind haze of licentiousness? Or are you confident that you can live by the Spirit and those commandments are guidelines for those who don't yet have the Spirit? Have you another view?
Or what?
You are generally correct. It's the intent of observance that is at issue. It's the difference between trying to be observant to please Christ as opposed to pleasing men.
What are you really asking? Do you think the Church should teach people its OK to do evil?Interesting explanation. Do you think that the church should still teach the law? Why or why not?
Interesting enough Paul says the law isn't for the righteous in I Tim 1 and we must use the law lawfully.The Apostle Paul seems to do a very good job edifying most of what is commanded as far as obedience and ordinance. Funny enough, the same people who dismiss the teachings before Christ also tend to dismiss a lot of Paul's teachings as well.
Paul states that the unrighteous will not inherit the Kingdom, everyone from sexual vanities to thieves to murderers- he is a testament in and of himself that it was never seen or intended that the teachings before Christ be obsolete thereafter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?