Millennial Considerations

[seventysevens]

Hi SS,

It can`t be the Lord as the person has actual sons. Then it can`t be King David of old as he is in the General Assembly as I previously said. Remember that this person is a regent king under the Lord who will rule through him, as it were, (by the Holy Spirit).

If you read on you will see that it does refer to Israel ruling over the nations on this earth.

`My tabernacle also shall be with them; indeed I will be their God, and they shall be my people. The nations also will know that I, the Lord, sanctify Israel, when my sanctuary is in their midst for evermore, (meaning long time.)

The man David, is just that, a man called David. That obviously is a favourite name in Israel, being the name of their most popular king. Still he is just a man called David. The Holy Spirit knows what he is saying and we are not to read anymore into it then what scripture says.

A man called David becomes king for a long time in Israel in the millennium and has sons to whom he gives his inheritance to.

Marilyn.

Do you think that David is mortal human because it is he has sons ?
You do know the dry bones are become reborn Israel ?

24 And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them.

25 And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, even they, and their children, and their children's children for ever: and my servant David shall be their prince for ever.

are these the sons you speak of ?

 

[BABerean2]

You do know the dry bones are become reborn Israel ?

Eze 37:1 The hand of the LORD was upon me, and carried me out in the spirit of the LORD, and set me down in the midst of the valley which was full of bones,
Eze 37:2 And caused me to pass by them round about: and, behold, there were very many in the open valley; and, lo, they were very dry.
Eze 37:3 And he said unto me, Son of man, can these bones live? And I answered, O Lord GOD, thou knowest.
Eze 37:4 Again he said unto me, Prophesy upon these bones, and say unto them, O ye dry bones, hear the word of the LORD.
Eze 37:5 Thus saith the Lord GOD unto these bones; Behold, I will cause breath to enter into you, and ye shall live:
Eze 37:6 And I will lay sinews upon you, and will bring up flesh upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and ye shall live; and ye shall know that I am the LORD.
Eze 37:7 So I prophesied as I was commanded: and as I prophesied, there was a noise, and behold a shaking, and the bones came together, bone to his bone.
Eze 37:8 And when I beheld, lo, the sinews and the flesh came up upon them, and the skin covered them above: but there was no breath in them.
Eze 37:9 Then said he unto me, Prophesy unto the wind, prophesy, son of man, and say to the wind, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live.
Eze 37:10 So I prophesied as he commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army.



It sounds like the bodily resurrection of the dead found in John 5:28-29, except for those trying to make modern Dispensational Theology work.

.

 

[seventysevens]

Eze 37:1
It sounds like the bodily resurrection of the dead found in John 5:28-29, except for those trying to make modern Dispensational Theology work.

.

Your understanding shows you have not truly studied the topic in order to know what it really means
Just as you do not understand why a rapture will happen as all you do is watch misleading false interpretations in videos done by people who have not studied nor understand why there is a rapture

 

[Marilyn C]

No such things as a 1000 year earthly kingom found in scripture.

Matthew 25:31-46 teaches Jesus returns in the final judgment, eternal life, eternal kingdom.

You have blinkers on dear bro, as we need to read ALL of scripture pertaining to that subject. That is ONLY ONE scripture you need to back up what you think that scripture says by other scriptures otherwise it is just your opinion. No doctrine / teaching of scripture is based on ONE scripture.

 

[Marilyn C]

I disagree that the New Heaven, Earth, Jerusalem come later, they are Isaiah 65/66

Sooo what about ...`For the child SHALL DIE one hundred years old...` (Isa. 65: 20) ?

 

[Marilyn C]

Do you think that David is mortal human because it is he has sons ?
You do know the dry bones are become reborn Israel ?

24 And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them.

25 And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, even they, and their children, and their children's children for ever: and my servant David shall be their prince for ever.

are these the sons you speak of ?

`Thus says the Lord God, "If the prince gives a gift of some of his inheritance to any of his sons, it shall belong to his sons; it is their possession by inheritance......` (etc) (Ez. 46: 16 forward)

 

[LastSeven]

Since that whole idea is beyond ludicrous, always was and is opposed to YHWH and His Word, and was begun as a source opposed to Christ and continued on purpose to oppress and to deceive all the people,
no.

The idea is beyond ludicrous? But that "idea" is in scripture. Are you really saying that you don't believe the scriptures?

 

[DavidPT]

No such things as a 1000 year earthly kingom found in scripture.

Matthew 25:31-46 teaches Jesus returns in the final judgment, eternal life, eternal kingdom.

Maybe you should make this part of your signature. That way you won't have to keep reminding us about this every so often. We would be reminded every time you posted.

 

[LastSeven]

You do know the dry bones are become reborn Israel ?

Why? Because Netanyahu said so?

Those dry bones are an obvious image of the dead coming back to life. That is a resurrection. Not a UN resolution.

 

[DavidPT]

`Thus says the Lord God, "If the prince gives a gift of some of his inheritance to any of his sons, it shall belong to his sons; it is their possession by inheritance......` (etc) (Ez. 46: 16 forward)

Maybe your mistake is thinking this prince in Ezekiel 46 is meaning this same prince in Ezekiel 37? Speaking for myself, I have never thought they might be.

 

[seventysevens]

Why? Because Netanyahu said so?

Those dry bones are an obvious image of the dead coming back to life. That is a resurrection. Not a UN resolution.

LOL obvious you did not even try to study this topic

 

[seventysevens]

`Thus says the Lord God, "If the prince gives a gift of some of his inheritance to any of his sons, it shall belong to his sons; it is their possession by inheritance......` (etc) (Ez. 46: 16 forward)

check out this or simply google 'who is the prince in Ezekiel 46

The Prince of Ezekiel 46

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

The idea is beyond ludicrous? But that "idea" is in scripture. Are you really saying that you don't believe the scriptures?

As you have chosen to believe something 'made up', source from outside YHWH, apart from and contrary to His Word...
Yes. No. And No. Sorry, someone tricked you totallly. (with your own approval, apparently. (though I'm not really sure it was wittingly on your part or not.)

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

LOL obvious you did not even try to study this topic

It might not be permitted in the world church that has taught the false teachings first, that he believes.

 

[LastSeven]

As you have chosen to believe something 'made up', source from outside YHWH, apart from and contrary to His Word...
Yes. No. And No. Sorry, someone tricked you totallly. (with your own approval, apparently. (though I'm not really sure it was wittingly on your part or not.)

Oh. Right. I quote scripture, but I'm the one making stuff up.

 

[LastSeven]

LOL obvious you did not even try to study this topic

I guess in your mind, anytime I disagree with you, I must not have "studied the topic". You might want to check that arrogance of yours the next time you pray. It's not a good look.

 

[DavidPT]

Sigh. You assume nonsense because you don't understand. Those "souls" John saw in heaven is us. We are those souls. We are those who are figuratively seated on thrones in heaven. It's not dead people he's seeing there. It's all those who are in Christ.

Not what other hardcore Amils who have been Amils for years told me on numerous occasions on another board I have been a member of. I simply assumed all Amils pretty much came to the same conclusions about these souls. These Amils claimed these souls continued their reign literally in heaven upon death. Thus why I see that as nonsense. But now that I finally understand that is not your view as well, the nonsense part no longer applies since I at least see logic in the way you are understanding this, not that I agree with you though. So you were correct then, I didn't understand your take on this, but instead assumed your take on this was the same as all other Amils I have encountered over the years. Thanks for making it clear to me now. Perhaps you already did prior to this, and if so, perhaps I didn't see that post if that is the case. Your position on this is a bit clearer to me now though. Thanks. Sorry for the nonsense part, it isn't applicable here after all since your position is logical.

 

[BABerean2]

Your understanding shows you have not truly studied the topic in order to know what it really means

Lets see now.

We have bones.

Then skin and flesh comes upon the bones.

And then the spirit of life comes into them and they live.

Why in the world would anyone think it is about a resurrection of the dead?


And you have studied the passage enough to know that it is about the creation of the modern State of Israel via the political manipulation of the Rothschild family who used the Balfour Declaration to get the United States into World War I, if the British would agree to give Palestine to the Zionists after the war ended.

Your interpretation is clearly more studied out than mine...

.

 

[Truth7t7]

Sooo what about ...`For the child SHALL DIE one hundred years old...` (Isa. 65: 20) ?

child die 100 years old isnt literal death, an expression of eternal.

if it would read a child dies at a zillion years then you would look at it different.

 

[Truth7t7]

Maybe you should make this part of your signature. That way you won't have to keep reminding us about this every so often. We would be reminded every time you posted.

As long as those in this forum teach in error there will be a earthly 1000 year kingdom after the return of Jesus?

I will continue to present scriptural truth showing when Jesus returns, the final judgment, eternal life, eternal kingdom, takes place.

There will be no 1000 year earthly kingdom, when Jesus returns, eternity begins!

Dont ya love Gods Truth Dave, Ain't gonna change.

Matthew 25:31-46 Read It Again And Again