• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

New Creation Millennialism

9Rock9

Sinner in need of grace.
Nov 28, 2018
377
258
South Carolina
✟130,345.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
So, I discovered another end times view that I think is interesting and want to share to get other's thoughts about it. I personally agree with it and it's probably what I lean towards (albeit tentatively.)

New Creation Millennialism (or NCM) is a viewpoint that sees both premillennialism and amillennialism as having serious weaknesses.

For instance, premillennials have to contend that two separate resurrections is not explicit in Scripture and that what is the purpose of the Millennium if the wicked dead are also resurrected. If the Millenium is the fully realized Kingdom of God, then what place in it is there for the unrighteousness?

However, amillennialism isn't without it's own issues, particularly with the binding of Satan. If he's shut up in a pit, then how can he also be prowling the earth like a roaring lion? He can supposedly no longer deceive the world, yet much of the world is deceived.

This is where NCM comes in. It's like amillennialism in that it interprets much of Revelation symbolically (preferring the recapitulation model of amillenialism) rather than a strictly chronological sequence of events like premillennialism. Also, like amillennialism, NCM only recognizes two ages: the current Church Age and the Age to Come/New Creation.

However, unlike amillennialism (but like premillennialism) NCM sees Revelation 20 as still in the future and expects the Millennium to be a literal physical kingdom established on the earth.
Instead of a separate era that occurs before the New Creation, NCM sees the Millennium as part of the New Creation. In other words, it's better to think of the Millennium as a phase of sub-era of the New Creation rather than its own separate age.

The Millennium is simply the era of the New Creation when Satan and the unrighteous dead (the second death) are imprisoned in Sheol (NCM is agnostic as to whether the Millennium will be a literal 1000 years or just figurative of an unspecified length of time.) During this time, Satan cannot deceive the people of God, who at this time are residing in and reigning over the New Creation.

When the Millennium is over, Satan and the wicked dead (the Gog and Magog mentioned in Revelation) will be released and try to destroy the kingdom of God, but ultimately fail

The two main proponents of this view are Tom Schreiner and J Webb Mealy. Schreiner seems to hold to the traditional Protestant view of eternal conscious torment, so after their attack, the wicked will suffer in hell for eternity.

Mealy, on the other hand, seems to be an annihilationist. He understands the "lake of fire" as connected to the fire from heaven and that in Greek, the word use for lake can mean a temporary pool of water (like a puddle left behind by rain or pool created by a tide.) So, he sees the lake of fire as what is left behind from the fire from heaven rather than a separate physical location.

What are your thoughts on this view?
 

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
12,368
10,295
66
Martinez
✟1,306,929.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So, I discovered another end times view that I think is interesting and want to share to get other's thoughts about it. I personally agree with it and it's probably what I lean towards (albeit tentatively.)

New Creation Millennialism (or NCM) is a viewpoint that sees both premillennialism and amillennialism as having serious weaknesses.

For instance, premillennials have to contend that two separate resurrections is not explicit in Scripture and that what is the purpose of the Millennium if the wicked dead are also resurrected. If the Millenium is the fully realized Kingdom of God, then what place in it is there for the unrighteousness?

However, amillennialism isn't without it's own issues, particularly with the binding of Satan. If he's shut up in a pit, then how can he also be prowling the earth like a roaring lion? He can supposedly no longer deceive the world, yet much of the world is deceived.

This is where NCM comes in. It's like amillennialism in that it interprets much of Revelation symbolically (preferring the recapitulation model of amillenialism) rather than a strictly chronological sequence of events like premillennialism. Also, like amillennialism, NCM only recognizes two ages: the current Church Age and the Age to Come/New Creation.

However, unlike amillennialism (but like premillennialism) NCM sees Revelation 20 as still in the future and expects the Millennium to be a literal physical kingdom established on the earth.
Instead of a separate era that occurs before the New Creation, NCM sees the Millennium as part of the New Creation. In other words, it's better to think of the Millennium as a phase of sub-era of the New Creation rather than its own separate age.

The Millennium is simply the era of the New Creation when Satan and the unrighteous dead (the second death) are imprisoned in Sheol (NCM is agnostic as to whether the Millennium will be a literal 1000 years or just figurative of an unspecified length of time.) During this time, Satan cannot deceive the people of God, who at this time are residing in and reigning over the New Creation.

When the Millennium is over, Satan and the wicked dead (the Gog and Magog mentioned in Revelation) will be released and try to destroy the kingdom of God, but ultimately fail

The two main proponents of this view are Tom Schreiner and J Webb Mealy. Schreiner seems to hold to the traditional Protestant view of eternal conscious torment, so after their attack, the wicked will suffer in hell for eternity.

Mealy, on the other hand, seems to be an annihilationist. He understands the "lake of fire" as connected to the fire from heaven and that in Greek, the word use for lake can mean a temporary pool of water (like a puddle left behind by rain or pool created by a tide.) So, he sees the lake of fire as what is left behind from the fire from heaven rather than a separate physical location.

What are your thoughts on this view?
My thoughts...you cant have it both ways.
A - Millennium is simply no literal 1000 year reign of Jesus Christ of Nazareth but a never ending time period. Most importantly, Jesus Christ of Nazareth is the Kingdom as He said:

" The Kingdom of God is in your midst ".

Who was in their midst? Jesus Christ of Nazareth. What did He say He would do if one loved Him? Make His Home in them.
And when He said He would send another Helper, He sent Himself, His Holy Spirit. So His Kingdom is in Him not a place. As Paul said, " absent from the body, present with the Lord".

Blessings
 
Upvote 0

RandyPNW

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
3,950
895
Pacific NW, USA
✟200,382.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So, I discovered another end times view that I think is interesting and want to share to get other's thoughts about it. I personally agree with it and it's probably what I lean towards (albeit tentatively.)

New Creation Millennialism (or NCM) is a viewpoint that sees both premillennialism and amillennialism as having serious weaknesses.
(NCM is agnostic as to whether the Millennium will be a literal 1000 years or just figurative of an unspecified length of time.) During this time,

What are your thoughts on this view?
I'm not aware of NCM? Anyway, yes there are weaknesses to both Premil and Amil, in my opinion. The Kingdom of God is a subject all to itself, however. I see the Kingdom as both heavenly and earthly--heavenly because the Kingdom is wherever God is, in heaven, and earthly because God endows some of His authority to earthly kingdoms such as OT Israel or even NT Christian kingdoms.

When Jesus was on earth in his earthly ministry he indicated the Kingdom was both "near" and "in the midst" of his disciples or people. This means that Jesus represented the Lord's rule both in heaven and on earth while he was on the earth. But his presence is reprsented by the Holy Spirit today even after he has gone back to heaven. So, the Kingdom is not fully here in a consummate sense, but only "near" in its sense of history currently proceeding to that end.

There is some truth to what some term "Realized Eschatology," though it is not truly eschatological at all. What this means is that the Kingdom, as it is currently in our midst through the Holy Spirit has some characteristics of its ultimate end in the eschaton. As we're told, we have the down payment of the spiritual life in anticipation of the entire endowment at the resurrection. We currently have power to live a Christian life now, even before we obtain our immortal inheritance.

I believe we are given power over Satan now, through the Cross. But Jesus' disciples operated in power over Satan, through Jesus' name, even before the Cross. So even though we may be able to bind demons in the name of Jesus Satan isn't actually bound until Jesus comes again. My opinion.
 
Upvote 0