Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Saraswati-Devi said:K2G:
again, What is this sin you keep speaking about you choose not to save yourself from?
Karma2Grace said:Since you quoted Nostradamus , Tell me why you have rejected him while "lot of people" think his prophecies have come true?
Why do you want me to accept somebody that you have already rejected?
TooCurious said:my point was that if your main criterion for believing in something is allegedly-proven prophecies, then wouldn't it make sense for you to believe in Nostradamus too?
MahaSudarshanChakra said:Oh, it is the sin of a forefather.![]()
MahaSudarshanChakra said:Oh, it is the sin of a forefather.![]()
coolbodhi said:It's like your great great great great grandfather killed a dog or a snake in someone's garden don't you think you are responsible for that? YOU ARE!
You mean that is too absurd to believe well...
Saraswati-Devi said:K2G:
again, What is this sin you keep speaking about you choose not to save yourself from?
Karma2Grace said:Yes if someones great great great great grandfather had a illicit sex and got AIDS then don't you think he/she is responsible to take the medicine?
SIN is a spritual AIDS!
Karma2Grace said:What is the bad karma left in your last incarnation so that you have been reincarnated?
Karma2Grace said:Yes if someones great great great great grandfather had a illicit sex and got AIDS then don't you think he/she is responsible to take the medicine?
SIN is a spritual AIDS!
TooCurious said:The problem with that idea is that morality, or lack thereof, isn't a virus. You can't catch it if someone sneezes (Note: you can't catch AIDS that way either, but I'm expanding on the virus metaphor). Morality and immorality is and must be a conscious choice. Sin (if you believe in it) is a conscious choice. If it isn't, then there's no logical way to hold someone morally culpable.
The doctrine of original sin never made sense to me, nor did the whole "sins of the fathers" policy. If *I* do something wrong, hold me responsible for it. If my father, or grandfather, or great-great-great-great grandfather does something wrong, hold *him* responsible for it. I had no part in it--especially if it happened before I was even born. I have no influence on or role in actions that were committed before I existed, and therefore I am not responsible for them and should not be held answerable for them. This just seems logical.
Karma2Grace said:What if you are hold responsible for the sins you have commited in your last (?) birth? Does it make sense?
TooCurious said:I'm not a Hindu myself, so I don't claim to believe in the concepts of reincarnation or Karma, but I will say that at least with Karma, they are sins that you (in some sense) actually committed yourself, as opposed to sins that you had absolutely nothing to do with, which strikes me as more logical than Original Sin. I'm not saying I believe in it, but it confuses me less.
Karma2Grace said:So do you think human kind is sinless, Can you point even a single person in this world who can claim that he is 100% pure?
Oh I don't know you believe that a Dog or Cat would sin! I am sorry!!
Zen_Woof said:Hi.
The kudos are nice, thanks. But I'm starting to feel bad about the bullying of K2G. We're all figuring out this thing called existence the best way we can ...
(Don't make me break out my crazy kumbayaa pix.)
Metta,
ZW
Zen_Woof said:Hi.
The kudos are nice, thanks. But I'm starting to feel bad about the bullying of K2G. We're all figuring out this thing called existence the best way we can ...
(Don't make me break out my crazy kumbayaa pix.)
Metta,
ZW