Man Arrested for Causing Trans Anxiety

[SilverBear]

The constitution is being attacked as racist and outdated.
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1259&context=penn_law_review_online
Amending a Racist Constitution
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...e-constitution-was-indeed-pro-slavery/406288/
Harmful Language in the U.S. Constitution? | The Federalist Society

but all this is true. the Constitution institutionalized slavery and it actually says black people are not fully human or worth the same as a human being.

 

[Pommer]

Discrimination because of sexual Orientation is prohibited. The Supreme Court gave them equal protection

Actually that was the 1964 Civil Rights Act that gave the protection…it took a few years to find that these protections shielded a person from loving the “wrong” people.

 

[SilverBear]

Absurd comparison.

But then I'm not surprised when it come from the words are violence crowd. To you guys posting a meme protesting the authoritarian ideology is exactly the same things as carving a swastika in someone's head. That's why you can justify throwing someone in prison for a meme. That's how authoritarianism works.

And you just proved it.

not absurd at all. we have two instances of people using a swastika to express themselves and their view.
You are defending one act as perfectly justifiable as an exercise in confronting the LGBT totalitarian regime so why can't the other instance claim the same thing? They certainly can and use your exact words as defense.

 

[SilverBear]

You're the one that asked and we proved out point. You asked who got cancelled and we told who and now you want to defend cancellation. Why bother asking?

You are for cancellation of people who do t agree. Authoritarianism of the LGBTQ ideology on full display.

and all you've done is come rushing to the defense of racists. Good job.

 

[Tropical Wilds]

Folks we are facing some serious issues today in regards to the LGBTQ agenda to force acceptance and completely shut down freedom of speech that opposes them in any way. Including sharing opinions or failing to accept the ideology. Remember speech is violence. And they are actively pursuing government intervention to shut you up including arrest if necessary and sendi g you to re-education.

In the UK a veteran was arrested for causing anxiety in a person due to a social media post. Including in this was a way to avoid a fine by going to re-education to teach you proper thinking.

The man re-posted a post where a person created a meme of a swastika made from gay pride flags. The meme was created as a protest against the the way gay pride month has been enforced with hectoring authoritarianism.

Someone saw the meme and reported the incident to police.

Veteran is arrested 'for causing anxiety' for retweeting meme of swastika made out of Pride flags | Daily Mail Online

We are headed this direction here in the US. Title 9 is now looking at rules expanding on the "harassing" rules. To such an extent of using government to shut down and eliminate your free speech.

Some of this has been put in hold through the courts but it's not decided yet.

Hold onto your hats. If you don't cowtow to the LGBTQ ideology the efforts to shut you up and punish you are in full swing.

Veteran is arrested 'for causing anxiety' for retweeting meme of swastika made out of Pride flags | Daily Mail Online

Then maybe don’t invoke imagery and symbols tied to the torture and murder of millions while inflicting upon us your opinion…?

 

[SilverBear]

The swastika is the ultimate symbol of authoritarianism. Although I'd argue that the hammer and sickle is just as bad if not worse, but that's beside the point.

People who use it as a symbol for their ideology are nothing more than authoritarians.

People also use it to claim that others are authoritarians.

It's no different than calling someone a Nazi. It's used in many different ways. In this case the author told us the meaning.

and how did dropping that swastika into a discussion about anti-trans hate crimes illustrate the "authoritarian lgbt movement"?

 

[BPPLEE]

.

 

[SilverBear]

Considering the persecution of homosexuals by Nazis, equating LGBTQ to Nazis is inappropriate and offensive, even if the intent is just to claim that the LGBTQ movement is authoritarian (somehow).

Persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany - Wikipedia

In fact, since the Nazis were prone to exterminating people they didn't like, using the symbol without providing an explanation could easily be misinterpreted as a terrorist-style warning against LGBTQ people, which would naturally cause law enforcement to take interest. But with a good explanation included with the symbol, the person using the symbol is just a massive jerk rather than a terrorist.

apparently its noble and praiseworthy to persecute SOME minorities

 

[BPPLEE]

Actually that was the 1964 Civil Rights Act that gave the protection…it took a few years to find that these protections shielded a person from loving the “wrong” people.

It was the Supreme Court's decision that applied it to sexual Orientation

 

[SilverBear]

To be effective they have to have consequences and be enforced. We seem to be moving away from enforcement and punishment, I don't think you can just blame the laws.

but it has been expressed here that consequences are part of an evil authoritarian regime akin to Nazism

 

[SilverBear]

You can lose your job over it. And it doesn't have to be intentional it is the perception that matters. Even telling someone you don't judge them is considered a micro aggression

you can loose your job for being LGBT

 

[SilverBear]

Double post

 

[BPPLEE]

but all this is true. the Constitution institutionalized slavery and it actually says black people are not fully human or worth the same as a human being.

Show me where it actually says that. Issues of the Constitutional Convention

 

[SilverBear]

Discrimination because of sexual Orientation is prohibited.

Bull

 

[BPPLEE]

Double post

If you do you can sue and most likely prevail. Beyond Bostock: The Future of LGBTQ Civil Rights

 

[Belk]

Discrimination because of sexual Orientation is prohibited. The Supreme Court gave them equal protection

I stand corrected. Regardless, you should not expect protection for most of your views.

 

[Belk]

Bull

No, it appears he is correct. Though more should be done.

Supreme Court Says Firing Workers Because They Are LGBTQ Is Unlawful Discrimination | News & Commentary | American Civil Liberties Union

 

[SilverBear]

Show me where it actually says that. Issues of the Constitutional Convention

article 1 section 2

 

[BPPLEE]

Bull

Beyond Bostock: The Future of LGBTQ Civil Rights

 

[BPPLEE]

article 1 section 2

Just says people who were not free would count as 3/5 for the purposes of the census