• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Kavanaugh's Drinking Memory

Go Braves

I miss Senator McCain
May 18, 2017
9,646
8,983
Atlanta
✟30,598.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
Dr. Ford's own lifelong friend ALSO said she has no memory of the party, nor having ever met Kavenaugh. And Judge's comments are under risk of perjury, as with everyone else who wrote a written statement claiming not to know of this party.

It's hardly surprising that the friend wouldn't recall details from a party 36 years back since there wasn't anything memorable that happened to her. Entirely different for Dr. Blasey Ford. That same friend has insisted, adamantly, that she believes her.

He was corroborated along the entire process. Many witnesses to Kavanaugh's character and activities, regularly working out, playing sports, et cetera. She, on the other hand, has NO corroborating evidence or anything regarding her claims.

What on earth does him regularly working out, playing sports, have to do with whether he did what the three women who've accused him said he did? She has many witnesses to her character too. She was a cheerleader & a swimmer. Friends remember that she'd been a social butterfly then "socially fell off the face of the planet" which lines up with how the victim of a sexual assault would act.

Again, the accusers are the ones who have pushed for the allegations. If Kavanaugh's innocent as he claims, he should not only welcome but DEMAND that they investigate. It's bullcrap that they can't or don't investigate this.
 
Upvote 0

Saucy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2005
46,778
19,964
Michigan
✟901,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
It's hardly surprising that the friend wouldn't recall details from a party 36 years back since there wasn't anything memorable that happened to her. Entirely different for Dr. Blasey Ford. That same friend has insisted, adamantly, that she believes her.



What on earth does him regularly working out, playing sports, have to do with whether he did what the three women who've accused him said he did? She has many witnesses to her character too. She was a cheerleader & a swimmer. Friends remember that she'd been a social butterfly then "socially fell off the face of the planet" which lines up with how the victim of a sexual assault would act.

Again, the accusers are the ones who have pushed for the allegations. If Kavanaugh's innocent as he claims, he should not only welcome but DEMAND that they investigate. It's bullcrap that they can't or don't investigate this.
They did investigate it. The FBI did release a statement after Feinstein sent the FBI the letter. Their letter stated that the matter is closed. All the FBI would do is take statements and report what each party stated. That's it. They did investigate the claims. Demanding more investigation is just a smokescreen to delay the confirmation, and I believe you're smart enough to realize this. You only side with Dr. Ford because you don't like Kavanaugh and don't want him appointed. NONE of the accusations have any merit or evidence or corroboration. The burden of proof was on her to prove her case, and she failed to do it.

This is over. Even several Democrats have already stated they are voting yes for Kavanaugh. That's how much of a case he has. He won. He will be confirmed.
 
Upvote 0

Saucy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2005
46,778
19,964
Michigan
✟901,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Is that what you deduce from Mitchell's line of questioning?
I do. I remember him specifically stating he was never too drunk that he never recalled anything. If you choose to not believe him, you have that right, but how much is 'too much' alcohol is relative to the individual. It's not for anyone but Judge Kavanaugh to say whether or not he was ever inebriated beyond the point of blacking out.
 
Upvote 0

Go Braves

I miss Senator McCain
May 18, 2017
9,646
8,983
Atlanta
✟30,598.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
They did investigate it. The FBI did release a statement after Feinstein sent the FBI the letter. Their letter stated that the matter is closed. All the FBI would do is take statements and report what each party stated. That's it. They did investigate the claims. Demanding more investigation is just a smokescreen to delay the confirmation, and I believe you're smart enough to realize this. You only side with Dr. Ford because you don't like Kavanaugh and don't want him appointed. NONE of the accusations have any merit or evidence or corroboration. The burden of proof was on her to prove her case, and she failed to do it.

This is over. Even several Democrats have already stated they are voting yes for Kavanaugh. That's how much of a case he has. He won. He will be confirmed.

No Saucy, the FBI has not investigated the allegations, plural, about Kavanaugh. Saucy I side with integrity, not with Kavanaugh or his accusers. Now you can keep on pulling as many assumptions out of your rear end as you please about me, but it just makes me laugh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USincognito
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
26,270
22,155
✟1,837,248.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
They did investigate it. The FBI did release a statement after Feinstein sent the FBI the letter. Their letter stated that the matter is closed. All the FBI would do is take statements and report what each party stated. That's it. They did investigate the claims.

Feinstein sends Ford's letter to the FBI after several days of rumors about its existence leaking out from Democratic senators. The bureau puts the letter in Kavanaugh's background check file but does not launch a criminal investigation, in part because the statute of limitations on the alleged sexual assault expired years earlier.
Brett Kavanaugh: A timeline of allegations against the Supreme Court nominee

The FBI background investigation did not include Ford's claims. President Trump refused to order the FBI to reopen the background investigation.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
29,631
16,815
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟477,238.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
I do. I remember him specifically stating he was never too drunk that he never recalled anything. If you choose to not believe him, you have that right, but how much is 'too much' alcohol is relative to the individual. It's not for anyone but Judge Kavanaugh to say whether or not he was ever inebriated beyond the point of blacking out.
When the transcript was in the other thread, I don't recall reading a definitive answer to the negative; simply an "I don't know".
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
26,270
22,155
✟1,837,248.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I do. I remember him specifically stating he was never too drunk that he never recalled anything. If you choose to not believe him, you have that right, but how much is 'too much' alcohol is relative to the individual. It's not for anyone but Judge Kavanaugh to say whether or not he was ever inebriated beyond the point of blacking out.

That isn't what he stated in testimony today. The transcript is available for you to prove otherwise. See the 1st post.
 
Upvote 0

Saucy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2005
46,778
19,964
Michigan
✟901,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
No Saucy, the FBI has not investigated the allegations, plural, about Kavanaugh. Saucy I side with integrity, not with Kavanaugh or his accusers. Now you can keep on pulling as many assumptions out of your rear end as you please about me, but it just makes me laugh.
I'm glad to make you laugh, but you're certainly not siding with integrity in this case. I don't know what you have against Kavanaugh, but from any perspective, there's zero evidence against Kavanaugh. Zero. Zilch. We're innocent until proven guilty in this country. That's the standard we need to operate by.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
29,631
16,815
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟477,238.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
I'm glad to make you laugh, but you're certainly not siding with integrity in this case. I don't know what you have against Kavanaugh, but from any perspective, there's zero evidence against Kavanaugh. Zero. Zilch. We're innocent until proven guilty in this country. That's the standard we need to operate by.
So to clarify: You believe that Ford is LYING or simply that it could have happenned/ did happen but she doesn't have evidence for it.
 
Upvote 0

Saucy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2005
46,778
19,964
Michigan
✟901,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
That isn't what he stated in testimony today. The transcript is available for you to prove otherwise. See the 1st post.
You quoted it yourself in your second post.

Was there ever a time when you drank so much that you couldn’t remember what happened, or part of what happened the night before?

KAVANAUGH: No, I — no. I remember what happened, and I think you’ve probably had beers, Senator, and — and so I…
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
29,631
16,815
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟477,238.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
You quoted it yourself in your second post.

Was there ever a time when you drank so much that you couldn’t remember what happened, or part of what happened the night before?

KAVANAUGH: No, I — no. I remember what happened, and I think you’ve probably had beers, Senator, and — and so I…
You'll note that he used the wrong phrasing in answering that question. He was asked if he'd EVER been black out drunk, but Kavanaugh is implying (at BEST) but seems to be referring to the "one instance" in question.
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
26,270
22,155
✟1,837,248.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You quoted it yourself in your second post.

Was there ever a time when you drank so much that you couldn’t remember what happened, or part of what happened the night before?

KAVANAUGH: No, I — no. I remember what happened, and I think you’ve probably had beers, Senator, and — and so I…

That's right. He confirmed there was never a time when he could not remember what happened.
 
Upvote 0

Saucy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2005
46,778
19,964
Michigan
✟901,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
So to clarify: You believe that Ford is LYING or simply that it could have happenned/ did happen but she doesn't have evidence for it.
Honestly, I felt she was believable and something happened to her. But she was drunk and short of memory. It could very well be a case of mistaken identity, as two men have come forward claiming to be the ones who did this. As I stated, no one questioned her about her drinking activities, how often she got drunk, etc. I don't know if she was lying.
 
Upvote 0

Go Braves

I miss Senator McCain
May 18, 2017
9,646
8,983
Atlanta
✟30,598.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
I'm glad to make you laugh, but you're certainly not siding with integrity in this case. I don't know what you have against Kavanaugh, but from any perspective, there's zero evidence against Kavanaugh. Zero. Zilch. We're innocent until proven guilty in this country. That's the standard we need to operate by.

I'm glad you're glad you continue to make me chuckle. Yes, I am standing with integrity, Saucy. Sorry you cannot see that from your limited perspective.

Do you think the women who've made the allegations against Kavanaugh are innocent until proven guilty of lying? Do you think that standard only applies on one side? In courts of law one is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. Saucy, Kavanugh is essentially applying for a job. One that once he gets he can't just be fired for like you can with other jobs. It's head up the rear end stupid, totally lacking in responsibility, to not investigate the allegations now.
 
Upvote 0

Saucy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2005
46,778
19,964
Michigan
✟901,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
You'll note that he used the wrong phrasing in answering that question. He was asked if he'd EVER been black out drunk, but Kavanaugh is implying (at BEST) but seems to be referring to the "one instance" in question.
No, he also said no about that too.

MITCHELL: OK. Have you ever passed out from drinking?

KAVANAUGH: I — passed out would be — no, but I’ve gone to sleep, but — but I’ve never blacked out. That’s the — that’s the — the allegation, and that — that — that’s wrong.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
....later:

KLOBUCHAR: OK. Drinking is one thing, but the concern is about truthfulness, and in your written testimony, you said sometimes you had too many drinks. Was there ever a time when you drank so much that you couldn’t remember what happened, or part of what happened the night before?

KAVANAUGH: No, I — no. I remember what happened, and I think you’ve probably had beers, Senator, and — and so I…

KLOBUCHAR: So you’re saying there’s never been a case where you drank so much that you didn’t remember what happened the night before, or part of what happened.

KAVANAUGH: It’s — you’re asking about, you know, blackout. I don’t know. Have you?

KLOBUCHAR: Could you answer the question, Judge? I just — so you — that’s not happened. Is that your answer?

KAVANAUGH: Yeah, and I’m curious if you have.

KLOBUCHAR: I have no drinking problem, Judge.

KAVANAUGH: Yeah, nor do I.

KLOBUCHAR: OK, thank you.
He pulled this Nathan Thurm shtick several times during his testimony didn't he.
 
Upvote 0

Saucy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2005
46,778
19,964
Michigan
✟901,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I'm glad you're glad you continue to make me chuckle. Yes, I am standing with integrity, Saucy. Sorry you cannot see that from your limited perspective.

Do you think the women who've made the allegations against Kavanaugh are innocent until proven guilty of lying? Do you think that standard only applies on one side? In courts of law one is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. Saucy, Kavanugh is essentially applying for a job. One that once he gets he can't just be fired for like you can with other jobs. It's head up the rear end stupid, totally lacking in responsibility, to not investigate the allegations now.
You have just as much limited perspective as I do, yet you seem to think you're above us all with your infinite wisdom.

And the rest of what you said is absurd and ridiculous. The accusations are against him. The burden of proof is on her to prove her case, and she didn't. You have zero evidence to assume his guilt in this case. None.

From every other standard, he's an amazing judge, with a respectable history, and perhaps the most qualified judge to have ever been nominated. You have no reason to believe these allegations and not support the man, other than whatever personal animus you're feeling towards Trump and his nomination.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

jazzflower92

Junior Member
Jul 31, 2013
1,590
639
✟74,085.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I'm glad you're glad you continue to make me chuckle. Yes, I am standing with integrity, Saucy. Sorry you cannot see that from your limited perspective.

Do you think the women who've made the allegations against Kavanaugh are innocent until proven guilty of lying? Do you think that standard only applies on one side? In courts of law one is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. Saucy, Kavanugh is essentially applying for a job. One that once he gets he can't just be fired for like you can with other jobs. It's head up the rear end stupid, totally lacking in responsibility, to not investigate the allegations now.

Except for the third one, the other two might have meat. However, as many have said, before this should have gotten focused on in July.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Saucy
Upvote 0

NothingIsImpossible

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
5,618
3,253
✟289,942.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In the end the focus on drinking is pointless since Fords own friends said she was wrong essentially and don't remember him at the party. He could be a rage filled drunk for all I care, evidence shows hes innocent and thats that. Given most people in the country drink beer, its weird to somehow say that has anything to do with sexual assault. Its like Dems are grasping at straws just to make sure another republican is elected into a high position.
 
Upvote 0