Shiloh Raven
Well-Known Member
- May 14, 2016
- 12,509
- 11,495
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
It was. Manifest Destiny comes to mind.
Very true.
Upvote
0
It was. Manifest Destiny comes to mind.
I understand that they are Israeli citizens by law but one would be hard pressed to say at first sight or at first mention that a man who is Arab and Muslim is an Israeli.Non-Jews have been Israelis since the beginning. There are Arabs and Druze that have Israeli citizenship. Till recently, Arabic was an official language of Israel.
I think one thing that baffles a lot of people (like me), is an evangelical insistence that the modern day State of Israel was God's active Will, and that it is something innately holy that we must support almost unilaterally. I don't know about that. I have also heard that the politics of the PLO / Hamas are / were pretty awful. I think I'm trying to distance myself from Zionism = theology, either way. I'm not sure. Thank you, though. Everything that everyone says helps a little, in some way.I understand that they are Israeli citizens by law but one would be hard pressed to say at first sight or at first mention that a man who is Arab and Muslim is an Israeli.
There is an ethnic/religious Jewish element to the state of Israel which is core to it's identity as a nation and I'm not necessarily against that.
I think one thing that baffles a lot of people (like me), is an evangelical insistence that the modern day State of Israel was God's active Will, and that it is something innately holy that we must support almost unilaterally. I don't know about that. I have also heard that the politics of the PLO / Hamas are / were pretty awful. I think I'm trying to distance myself from Zionism = theology, either way. I'm not sure. Thank you, though. Everything that everyone says helps a little, in some way.
What I have also noticed, is that Evangelical news about the Holy Land almost always excludes reference to what life is like, on the ground, for local Catholic and Orthodox Christians, and the increasingly marginalized Messianic Jewish population in Israel. And how both communities suffer on / because of either side of the wall. I get a lot of news about acts of violence perpetrated by Muslim Arabs, but that's about it. Not much else. I'm thinking there has got to be a lot more to the story.I mostly can't buy into the Israel focused theology because it seems absent from Christian thinking until Pentecostalism and the obsession with the end times in some Christian circles. Before then Christians never had a concept of reviving a Jewish state but would have preferred it to be retaken for Christendom.
Israel as a State does seem like a miracle and I think God might have been behind it, that however does not obligate the Christian to back Israel at any cost. Israel must be judged like any other nation.
I think one thing that baffles a lot of people (like me), is an evangelical insistence that the modern day State of Israel was God's active Will, and that it is something innately holy that we must support almost unilaterally. I don't know about that. I have also heard that the politics of the PLO / Hamas are / were pretty awful. I think I'm trying to distance myself from Zionism = theology, either way. I'm not sure. Thank you, though. Everything that everyone says helps a little, in some way.
That's unfortunate. I was not being the least bit subtle. Is there a more legitimate reason to take land than having a holy book that tells you to? I cannot think of one myself.I have no idea what you mean.
He isn't wrong. That's the entire point of the state of Israel, to be a Jewish state, the only Jewish state in the world and to suggest that non Jews are Israelis would result destroy Israel as we know it.
Meaning what exactly?Seems the "quest for ethnic purity" shoe is on the other foot, doesn't it?
Meaning what exactly?
It means that Israel wants a nation where only those of a certain "kind" -- be it racially, ethnically, or religiously -- are acceptable.
I seem to recall something in my history books where they found themselves on the wrong end of that kind of thinking...
Having one that identifies yourselves as uniquely earmarked by God and better than everyone else is.
I don't believe that for a second. If ever we see the Christian or Muslim communities put in ovens, then you have a point.
Israel has a vested interest in keeping it's minority population safe; It's Christian population to ensure good relationships with Christian countries to ensure not only alliances but the tourism industry.
The Muslim population cannot be totally destroyed because Israel is surrounded by hostile Muslim nations and that seems a good a check as any against wiping out the Muslim community wholesale.
At the same time Israel has an interest in being a Jewish State and why shouldn't it? Jews for centuries have lacked a state of their own and their fates have been dictated by the whims of those in power whom they were subject to.
Why should it be wrong for Israel to seek to keep the identity as a Jewish nation primarily?
Having a religious/ethnic national identity isn't a bad thing.
The point sounds like anything short of stuffing them in ovens is perfectly acceptable.
I would like to point out that "stuffing them in ovens" wasn't how it began when they were on the wrong end of it, either...
(Not to imply that there's ever a "right" end to that sort if thinking...)
If alliances and tourism is the only things stopping them from ethnic cleansing, maybe we should rethink our alliance with them...
Remember the good ol days, when people argued against committing atrocities not because of negative consequences, but because they were atrocities?
Don't worry; I still do.
And now that they are in power, they can learn from the mistakes of those who once persecuted them... by doing it right this time?
Depends on how they intend to deal with those who don't measure up to their ideal...
What a nation does in its attempts to enforce such an identity can go bad very, very quickly. One would think the Jews, of all people, would know that.
Of course, it only takes a few generations for a people to forget...
Oh, interesting. So if some people showed up at your house and said their holy book instructed them to take over the house, you would find that legitimate? I mean, there are a bazillion “holy books” out there.That's unfortunate. I was not being the least bit subtle. Is there a more legitimate reason to take land than having a holy book that tells you to? I cannot think of one myself.
If the Jews ever begin invading Lebanon, Syria, Egypt in an attempt to establish the Jewish equivalent of Lebensraum you will have a point. I don't see that happening and nor do I see Jews attempting to confiscate Christian owned holy sites or property or establish the Third temple.
Your fear of national identities and the preservation of those identities has not been justified nor can you make the argument statements like Netenyahu's will lead to a Nazi state of Israel.
Oh, interesting. So if some people showed up at your house and said their holy book instructed them to take over the house, you would find that legitimate? I mean, there are a bazillion “holy books” out there.
Because non-Jews live there, and lived there before the state of Israel was created. If you have to bulldoze someone’s house to maintain your religious or ethnic nation, something is wrong. Discrimination based on religion or race is wrong. What’s going on in Israel is apartheid, plain and simple and my Jewish friends here in the U.S. agree.Why should it be wrong for Israel to seek to keep the identity as a Jewish nation primarily?
Having a religious/ethnic national identity isn't a bad thing.