• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

If there is no evidence for creation...

bill'swife

let peace rule...
Jan 23, 2005
40,206
19,383
57
facebook
Visit site
✟142,389.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Then I suggest you be serious and answer the problem.
You can suggest that, but I didn't think you were being serious...:sorry:

I hate to say it but this is the most action I have seen around here for awhile...thanks guys.....sending some reps to you AV1611VET!!!:thumbsup: Can't say I have really learned anything though, oh yeah, almost forgot about paschal's wager....I guess I did learn something new. :D I may be lurking here doing one of these :doh:every now and then....then again, I may not. As much as I like to have the last word...I will let you all think you've have it as I will be praying for all of you!!!:)

peace,
bill'swife
 
  • Like
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

Danyc

Senior Member
Nov 2, 2007
1,799
100
✟17,670.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
You can suggest that, but I didn't think you were being serious...:sorry:

I hate to say it but this is the most action I have seen around here for awhile...thanks guys.....sending some reps to you AV1611VET!!!:thumbsup: Can't say I have really learned anything though, oh yeah, almost forgot about paschal's wager....I guess I did learn something new. :D I may be lurking here doing one of these :doh:every now and then....then again, I may not. As much as I like to have the last word...I will let you all think you've have it as I will be praying for all of you!!!:)

peace,
bill'swife

What?

If you thought I was kidding, now you don't, inasmuch as I made a silly little scenario with God talking.

The problem is still there. Answer it.

God doesn't force us to believe, but if we don't believe, we go to Hell?

Yeah, we can choose to go to hell....(what?)

That's about as backwards as saying that the government doesn't force you to not murder anyone....you have a choice, of course. Go ahead, murder someone, I don't care....just keep that death penalty in the back of your mind.
 
Upvote 0

MoonLancer

The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
Aug 10, 2007
5,765
166
✟29,524.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Noone is going to Hell that doesn't deserve to go.

really? how do you figure that?

the year, 0070, a Tibetan monk breaths his last breath. In no way is it possible for him to know about god or Jesus at this time. Should he go to hell?
 
Upvote 0

thaumaturgy

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2006
7,541
882
✟12,333.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I don't care about paschal's wager

Good for you! Your lack of interest in religious thought is refreshing to see! I congratulate you on it. I love aggressive lack of interest.

and you are sure of nothing. Nobody forced me to believe anything. God doesn't force us to do anything. I didn't accept Christ to avoid eternal punishment but is is definitely one of the many benefits of salvation!!!

But, I will remind you, you proffered the Wager as something to think about. While you may not have used it to come to your belief, obviously you must think it has some value for some people.

And I am sorry if you don't like hearing about Hell...it is real and I'm not gonna tiptoe around it. No offence, I know you don't think there is a Hell but I guess I wouldn't wanna be reminded about it either if I thought I was goin' there.

Ah, you missed my point: I think that if God wishes to impress his existence upon us, it shouldn't be in the form of "fear" of the punishment he will mete out for failing to believe, but rather to express positively his existence to those of us who don't believe.

I know this may be a subtlety you don't quite grasp, but let me put it another way:

Suppose I hide in a building and put a sign on the front door that says "Thaumaturgy is in this building somewhere, you will never see him directly, but if you fail to believe in him, he will arrange to have you beaten up and killed. Oh yes and remember, Thaumaturgy loves you beyond all rational thought."

Now of course this sounds horrible, and doesn't appear to be the idea of God. But remember, God has presumably created the universe and loves us. But for those who believe in a literal hell that means they believe he also created that literal hell. It isn't rational to assume that there is even a chance that God's main way to draw people to him is to offer the chance at avoiding punishment.

Think of it the way the atheists see it: We don't see any evidence for God that we feel is compelling. That's not to say God doesn't exist, just that we fail to see evidence that would convince us. In my case I left religion because I was obsessing too much on the fear and never really felt the "up-side" of belief. When I thought I'd found God, turns out I was really just happy about a relationship I was in.

Why must God remain veiled? Why can't God be as plain and obvious as Gravity? Presumably you feel God is the most important concept in all of creation, why can't that most important concept have no mystery, no question?

But further, there's no need for eternal punishment unless God sets up the rules of the game. Why disproportionate punishment? Why hide himself, even slightly, when the stakes are nearly infinitely high?

If faith is nothing more than fear (which is what it had pretty much become for me), then what is the good side? Why live life like that? Was that God's "Plan" for my existence?

I live a moral existence and try to do my best. I realize my shortcomings and know I am no better than anyone else, and I attempt to live my life such that I can be of help and assistance to the world around me. Why must I live in fear in addition? Why must this be a question?

peace and blessings

Thank you. Like I said I care deeply about religious thought. I'm no longer religious, but I have spent years and years reading, studying and attempting to understand it. When I was a believer and even after I left the faith.
 
Upvote 0

thaumaturgy

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2006
7,541
882
✟12,333.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Thaumaturgy, she's not the one that brought up Paschal's Wager. In fact, I got the impression she doesn't even know what Paschal's Wager is.

Can you read? She described Pascal's Wager without knowing it was called that. So indeed, she brought it up here:

I mean,if I really didn't believe, I might think like this....."If God isn't real and I believe, no harm done, it wouldn't matter anyway, what do you have to lose? I just die. On the other hand if God is real(and He is:thumbsup:) and I don't believe I have everything to lose winding up in Hell for eternity." Sorta like it's better to be safe than sorry....you know what I mean?

Now I know you, AV, have no interest in religious thought or philosophy apart from your own little world, but when someone brings up a concept, it never hurts to show them the origins of the thought they are expressing.

Don't worry, AV, no one is expecting you to learn anything, but do please attempt to follow the conversation, so you dont' end being shown you are factually wrong as you are here claiming she didn't bring up Pascal's Wager. Just an fyi.
 
Upvote 0

MoonLancer

The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
Aug 10, 2007
5,765
166
✟29,524.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
In Relationship
I know what you mean. I had a thread that poised the question (albeit someone elses question) why does god not heal amputees if he is said to heal cancer patients?

Not one decent response by people who believe in gods miracles. Some people said the healing occurred on the inside (the warm fuzzy god) and others said that their have been amputees physically healed (having their arm regenerated), but couldn't provide any reference or even anyone that made such a claim.

so yeah, i know how you feel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gaara4158
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,571
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,485.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Don't worry, AV, no one is expecting you to learn anything, but do please attempt to follow the conversation, so you dont' end being shown you are factually wrong as you are here claiming she didn't bring up Pascal's Wager. Just an fyi.
Just fyi, I believe Paschal's Wager is based on Hedonistic Calculus.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,571
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,485.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Romans 3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God

I thought everyone deserved to go to Hell, but God provided the gift of salvation by Grace.
And your point?
 
Upvote 0

Gracchus

Senior Veteran
Dec 21, 2002
7,199
821
California
Visit site
✟30,682.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Ok, first off, I'm am not going to be able to totally disprove Evolution....If I did that, I'd be famous...because I would have just put down a popular theory down the drain lol. I don't think that's going to happen by myself.

It is good to see you have not entirely lost touch with reality.

Shicoco said:
But here ya go, reply back when you're done with the following:

1. Irreducible Complexity in microbiological processes.

Michael Behe, testifying in Kitzmiller vs. Dover was not able to demonstrate irreducible complexity, and he has a Ph.D. in biochemistry. A mere lawyer showed that he was spewing feces from his oral orifice. So, it is up to you to demonstrate that there are irreducibly complex structures in biology.

Shicoco said:
2. Polonium-218 Halos in primordial granite

What, exactly, are you talking about? What has petrology to do with evolution?

Shicoco said:
3. Astronomical probabilities calculated as necessary for the simplest proteins to form (not enough time).

Show your calculations. You would be unreasonable to ask us to critique calculations that we have not seen.

Shicoco said:
4. Fossil Record

What about it?

Shicoco said:
5. Existence of information more complicated than a computer language encoded in DNA requires an author.

The hallmark of a good computer program is simplicity, not complexity. And DNA is not a code, though it is often referred to as such. It is a template. Do you know the difference?

Shicoco said:
6. Genetics, i.e. losses always involved in mutations, fatality rate when mutations occur.

Mutations do not always involve losses. Gene duplication is known from the laboratory and the field. The duplicated gene can then mutate to produce a new protein while the original continues to function. Other mutations may be changes. Most are neutral, having no effect on the organism. By the way, natural selection is about the elimination of lethal mutations from the gene pool.

Shicoco said:
7. 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.

Please state the second law, and show what it has to do with biological evolution.

Come back when you are able to explain your own points.

:wave:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EnemyPartyII
Upvote 0

EnemyPartyII

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2006
11,524
893
39
✟20,084.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Please note: Anyone else who copmes out with this "probability of life forming spontaneously is astronomical" point needs to realise that in comparing probabilities, the probabilities of ALL considered options need to be presented.

So, you can say "the possibility of life forming is 7 kajillion to 1" and show your calculations, however, that proves nothing at all until you show your calculations for determining the possibility of your proposed explanation.

Short version... calcualte the probability of life occuring spontaneously, THEN calculate the probability of God creating life, then compare probabilities. Any other discussion of probabilities without said comparison is meaningless.

Good luck coming up with a realistic calculation for God.
 
Upvote 0

EnemyPartyII

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2006
11,524
893
39
✟20,084.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Please note: Anyone else who copmes out with this "probability of life forming spontaneously is astronomical" point needs to realise that in comparing probabilities, the probabilities of ALL considered options need to be presented.

So, you can say "the possibility of life forming is 7 kajillion to 1" and show your calculations, however, that proves nothing at all until you show your calculations for determining the possibility of your proposed explanation.

Short version... calcualte the probability of life occuring spontaneously, THEN calculate the probability of God creating life, then compare probabilities. Any other discussion of probabilities without said comparison is meaningless.

Good luck coming up with a realistic calculation for God.
 
Upvote 0

Gracchus

Senior Veteran
Dec 21, 2002
7,199
821
California
Visit site
✟30,682.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Just fyi, I believe Paschal's Wager is based on Hedonistic Calculus.

For those too lazy to Google:

"The felicific calculus is an algorithm formulated by utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham for calculating the degree or amount of pleasure that a specific action is likely to cause. Bentham, an ethical hedonist, believed the moral rightness or wrongness of an action to be a function of the amount of pleasure or pain that it produced. Thus, the felicific calculus could, in principle at least, determine the moral status of any considered act. The algorithm is also known as the utility calculus, the hedonistic calculus, hedonic calculus, and the Variables, or vectors of the pleasures and pains included in this calculation—which Bentham called "elements" or "dimensions"—were:

1. Intensity: How strong is the pleasure?
2. Duration: How long will the pleasure last?
3. Certainty or Uncertainty: How likely or unlikely is it that the pleasure will occur?
4. Propinquity or Remoteness, time distance: How soon will the pleasure occur?
5. Fecundity: The probability that the action will be followed by sensations of the same kind.
6. Purity: The probability it will not be followed by sensations of the opposite kind.

To these six, which consider the pleasures and pains within the life of a person, Bentham added a seventh element:

7. Extent: How many people will be affected?"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonistic_calculus
"Jeremy Bentham (IPA: ['benθəm] or ['bentəm]) (15 February 1748–6 June1832) was an English jurist, philosopher, and legal and social reformer."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Bentham

Blaise Pascal (pronounced [blɛz paskal]), (June 19, 1623 – August 19, 1662) was a French mathematician, physicist, and religious philosopher.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaise_Pascal

It would seem Pascal died 170 years before Bentham was born.
:doh:Perhaps Newton's work was based on the philosophy of Albert Camus?

In any case, you are off topic again, AV1611VET. Are you naturally scatterbrained, or did you require training?

:confused:
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,571
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,485.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
In any case, you are off topic again, AV1611VET. Are you naturally scatterbrained, or did you require training?
I missed ya --- that's why I brought it up --- ;)
 
Upvote 0