A cruise ship with over 6000 people on board but having less than 50 guests test positive with Covid-19 isn't getting hit hard. The vaccines are over 90% effective in preventing infection with the disease one could expect several hundred cases if a few passengers had breakthrough infections before boarding.
You do realize that the abortive stem cells used for medical research are well-identified? Moderna was developed (as I understand it) from a long line of stem cells dating from an abortion performed in the Netherlands in 1973. The lunatic fringe suggestion that these vaccines were developed with cells from abortions performed at Planned Parenthood clinics last week is nonsense. If you're going to be intellectually honest and carefully research and reject every medicine that has some reliance on abortive tissue in its development, you're going to pretty quickly find yourself telling your doctor "I guess I'll just die now, doc, because I can't take that stuff."
This is starting to sound like the old joke where the guy on his roof in a flood keeps saying he'll "just trust the Lord," eventually drowns, and is greeted in heaven by the Lord saying "For crying out loud, I sent a fire truck with a ladder, a boat and finally a helicopter, you idiot!" (or something like that).
Great. So all that we have to do is chose which batch are lying.
To reasonably protect the at risk people is not doing nothing. To encourage and seek alternative treatments is not doing nothing. To stop giving foolish advice (ever changing contradictory advice as well) over masks would be doing something. To triple ensure that all major public advocates of the lockdown agenda are not benefiting from it somehow is doing something. To keep people working as much as possible and protect freedom and quality of life is doing something. To have the drug companies liable for all death and side effects would be doing something. etc
Let's not force people to take experimental gook that the producers insisted that they cannot be held responsible for! Let's not pretend possibly overused masks protect us. Some say wearing chicken wire on your face would keep viruses out as much! Let's protect the at risk without robbing freedom and going full monte nazi! Let's not censor medical opinion that differs from big brother! Let's use alternative treatments that are shown to save lives if people want them! etc. Let's tell the bullies to go to hell.
The biggest risk in some people's minds is the vaccine and agenda! Stop thinking you have any right to force isolation. Give us liberty or give us death. Protect those who actually are at risk and use life saving treatments, and do not ruin people's last days on earth preventing them from seeing loved ones etc.
It is not identifying them that I mind. It is using them in the first place!
You don't get it. It is still based on research using those murdered unborn people.
We know.
Then don't blame them on God!
But millions may (have already) died and got seriously injured using them!
False. Even God gives us the choice to receive His eternal life gift. Society these days is racing toward a Satanic dictatorship that seeks to force it's way on all.
While I know we need to take what whistleblowers say with a grain of salt, I found this article interesting.
I would not trust that at all, it is from the same people that make the vaccines. I wonder if they will be held responsible for deaths and injuries from the pill that they will make untold billions from?
You should not trust anything at all that is found only on InfoWars. EVER! As for "trusting Pfizer", it would be extremely difficult for Pfizer engineer a conspiracy in the face of all the government involvement in regulation and oversight. Plus, the incentive to hide this particular bit of information is not sufficient to justify the risk. The reputation of the company means so much more than the small short-term gain from making it "seem" that fetal tissue is used in the making of vaccine.
Maybe we should say the same for msbn or cnn etc?
Is that the government that they give big donations to etc? The government that can't whack babies fast enough and that absolves the drug companies from all responsibility? The government that helps suppress alternative treatments? Very suspicious.
That is your guess.
Even if you are correct they still used the research.
No. They have a good reputation for truthfulness. InfoWars has none. In fact it has a reputation for falsehoods.
As the conspiracy theory is trying to be justified, we see here that it is necessary to hypothesize more and more levels of corruption, which makes the conspiracy theory less and less believable, which is something because it had no believability to begin with, so it ends up just being silly.
Yes, they (and most other pharma companies) did, and that is never to be condoned, and neither do I condone it. However there is a limit to how much perfection we demand from those we deal with, and a limit to the degree of moral culpability incurred by those whose connection to the original immoral act is more and more distant.'
? Seriously? You thought mainstream media had a good rep? No. I do not even look at those anymore. But you believe whom you like.
I see. So when people admit truth that is conspiracy and when they work hand in hand, covering stuff up, absolving the other of responsibility, and pouring money into mainstream media, that is accidental? Ha.
When imperfect concoctions are mandatory and no accountability exists that is wicked as far as I am concerned.
Mainstream media has existed for several centuries at least, and during that time it has proven more reliable when taken as an aggregate than any other single source of information. Regardless of what one thinks of mainstream media, one should always consider when a story is single-sourced as compared to a story that has multiple independent sources. If CNN were the only source for a story and all the other outlets were reporting the opposite, I would disbelieve CNN too. And here you have a InfoWars story that is confirmed by nobody else. That alone should raise a red flag.
This is called "begging the question" and it has been recognized as a logical fallacy since the time of Aristotle. (Begging the Question is when you assume what you are trying to prove is true in order to prove it is true.)
I have no idea if the "people" in the article are even real, or if they are, that what was reported about them is real.
Portraits of people who may or may not have died prove nothing.
History aside it is obviously worthless today.
I have no reason to doubt the tens of thousands of experts, whistleblowers and witnesses and victims that warn against what is going on. That is logical, period.
I could say the same about your media
You doubting for no reason proves nothing.
Not so. Past performance is best predictor of future behavior. Mainstream media, which is a combination of separate news sources, all competing for reputation, have done much better than any single source with no reputation over the past two hundred years of journalism, starting with the big national newspapers, then later radio and television networks. InfoWars has no such pedigree, and such a pedigree as it does have is for falsehoods.
That might be true if there actually were tens of thousands of experts, whistleblowers and witnesses and victims that are saying what claim they are saying. But their aren't, despite InfoWars claims to the contrary.
You could say it, but it would not be true, because the people that are reported about by the mainstream media can be confirmed by multiple independent sources. Not so with your InfoWars stories.
