Seriously, ICR? Did you even search for the Judith Hooper book they reference? In less than a minute you could have run a quick search and found that it's been described as "littered with errors, misrepresentations, misinterpretations and falsehoods" and many of her claims have been refuted. That's the standard ICR hold for themselves - they blatantly quote material which has been shown to be erroneous knowing that the average creationist won't question them. Most people call that lying, but the credulous call it "effective research" and swallow it hook, line and sinker without even thinking that ICR may be pulling the wool over their eyes.Yes Peppered Moths do exist, but the pictures
where miss labeled and displayed as proof of evolution.
Peppered Moth Still Not Evolving
Peppered Moth Still Not Evolving
lol. You link to an article which says that not only have they identified the gene that was responsible for the change, they also have a pretty good idea when the change happened. I'm not sure how that is supposed to help with your claim that evolution is bunk, but it's a highly effective way of shooting yourself in the foot.Famous peppered moth's dark secret revealed
Textbook moth's dark secret revealed
Good work.
Last edited:
Upvote
0