Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc. God did it!!

[David Hine7]

Use the reply function, it exists for a reason. You've used it before, so you can keep using it for talking to other people. First thing.

Second thing: you're doing nothing to prove that to anyone but yourself that God did anything. You see God as doing everything, as you are right to do, but not everyone else is going to accept what you say. Let alone when your argument is something that people are soundly debunking

My maths method gets the right anwers that egree with the measuered Ho values. Interesting and carries a strong message.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

My maths method gets the right anwers that egree with the measuered Ho values. Interesting and carries a strong message.

But by what criteria can you say that the Ho values show that God did it?

 

[sjastro]

Lamaitre was not using the universe expansion (first reported by Isaiah Ch. 40, and later by Hubble) as a challenge to God. Lamaitre claimed he was studying God's Creation (which is what non currupted PROPER non corrupted science is about) so that point you make is an invalid accusation of the integrity of Lamaitre as a worker for God.. .

So you are making up fairy tales, Lemaitre was very careful in differentiating his faith from science knowing very well God is unfalsifiable in science.
This is clearly evident as his “primeval atom” hypothesis for the birth of the universe was based on the early days of quantum mechanics not on studying God's creation.

The Beginning of the World from the Point of View of Quantum Theory - Nature

SIR ARTHUR EDDINGTON1 states that, philosophically, the notion of a beginning of the present order of Nature is repugnant to him. I would rather be inclined to think that the present state of quantum theory suggests a beginning of the world very different from the present order of Nature...

www.nature.com

 

[sjastro]

My maths method gets the right anwers that egree with the measuered Ho values. Interesting and carries a strong message.

2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 70.9449 k/s/Mpc

Lets ignore the fact you got the units horribly wrong (yours are (k/s).Mpc instead of k/s/Mpc) and do a straight out calculation.

c = 3 x 10⁵ (km/s)
1 Mpc = 3.09 x 10¹⁹ (km)
π²¹ ≈ 2.8 x 10¹⁰

(2 x (1 Mpc) x c)/ π²¹ = [2 x (3.09 x 10¹⁹) x (3 x 10⁵)]/2.8 x 10¹⁰ = 6.62 x 10¹⁴.

Maybe in your world 6.62 x 10¹⁴ (= 662000000000000) is close enough to 70.9449 in the real world it isn't.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Lets ignore the fact you got the units horribly wrong (yours are (k/s).Mpc instead of k/s/Mpc) and do a straight out calculation.

c = 3 x 10⁵ (km/s)
1 Mpc = 3.09 x 10¹⁹ (km)
π²¹ ≈ 2.8 x 10¹⁰

(2 x (1 Mpc) x c)/ π²¹ = [2 x (3.09 x 10¹⁹) x (3 x 10⁵)]/2.8 x 10¹⁰ = 6.62 x 10¹⁴.

Maybe in your world 6.62 x 10¹⁴ (= 662000000000000) is close enough to 70.9449 in the real world it isn't.

It does work out to 71 in units of ly km/s, but it is still meaningless.

 

[sjastro]

It does work out to 71 in units of ly km/s, but it is still meaningless.

There should be at least some sort of consistency in doing the calculations km (km/s) looks less ridiculous than ly (km/s).
(Nothing beats π²¹ however).

 

[Hans Blaster]

There should be at least some sort of consistency in doing the calculations km (km/s) looks less ridiculous than ly (km/s).
(Nothing beats π²¹ however).

I keep getting pi^21 in my calculations all the time...

 

[Yttrium]

But... they didn't have kilometers or light years as units of measurement when the Bible was written...

Numerology is so nonsensical.

 

[Ophiolite]

But... they didn't have kilometers or light years as units of measurement when the Bible was written...

Numerology is so nonsensical.

But they did have Q-bits, or was it cubits?

 

[Stopped_lurking]

Can somebody help me understand "the dynamic aether framework"? pi^21!? Do one have to calculate some area or volume for some hypersphere in a n-dimensional space (for a suitable n), or is it more some trigonometric function that gives rise to pi^21?

 

[Larniavc]

You will find all secular guesses come from desparation to challenge God.

I think you are over representing how much many people value Christianity. Certainly when doing science. Supernatural beings don’t factor into science.

 

[Larniavc]

which has exactly WHAT to do with God?

10 If “science wrong” then go to 20
20 let 20= “Jesus”
30 print 20
40 go to 10

 

[Larniavc]

My maths method gets the right anwers that egree with the measuered Ho values. Interesting and carries a strong message.

Saying 1+1= God is not really compelling.

 

[Desk trauma]

Is that you Mr Howard?

 

[David Hine7]

Never forget anything to do with Ho is a speed / distance entity. It can never be expressed in terms other than that. This is the FATAL error you ALL make. So oneMpc x C, divided by Ho gives distance as light years to the observable horizon.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Never forget anything to do with Ho is a speed / distance entity. It can never be expressed in terms other than that.

Speed/distance is 1/time. It can always be written in inverse seconds (or years, or fortnights).

This is the FATAL error you ALL make. So oneMpc x C, divided by Ho gives distance as light years to the observable horizon.

Nope. "oneMpc x C" is distance * speed. Ho is speed divided by distance, so....

1 Mpc * c / Ho = [distance * speed ]/ [speed/distance] = distance * distance = area

 

[David Hine7]

That's the mistake all make. Don't forget volume or area has a single dimention of distance, which in the Ho case is light years. What area or volume did the excaped gas leak out to? You can legitimately say it spread out to 2 miles distance. You CANNOT legitimately say it spread out to 2 hours. That would be nonsense. So you are wrong, are you not???

 

[David Hine7]

Speed/distance is 1/time. It can always be written in inverse seconds (or years, or fortnights).

Nope. "oneMpc x C" is distance * speed. Ho is speed divided by distance, so....

1 Mpc * c / Ho = [distance * speed ]/ [speed/distance] = distance * distance = area

"There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true the other is to refuse to believe what is true." Søren Kierkegaara

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

"There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true the other is to refuse to believe what is true." Søren Kierkegaara

Maybe you should send your calculations to NASA instead of responding with trite quotes from other people. See what they say on the matter. That would prove any one else wrong and you right for sure.

 

[David Hine7]

Maybe you should send your calculations to NASA instead of responding with trite quotes from other people. See what they say on the matter. That would prove any one else wrong and you right for sure.

What do NASA know about anything?? They simply squint through slightly bigger telescopes than you, but stll get the maths wrong, confusing distance by saying "distance and / or speed is time only". Prats. So you bow humbly down low and worship NASA prats