Of course, we have heard this argument before, but it does not make sense to me. So, by this logic, a believer who does not believe the three things listed will not be resurrected? To secure this "saved" state, one only needs to "remember" the three facts. So, the truth that saves your soul differs from the truth that gets you resurrected? Is it possible to be saved but not resurrected, or resurrected but not saved, depending on what you believe? Not even believe, but merely "remember" it?
If you are a believer in Jesus for the salvation of your soul, and you fail to keep these specific three facts in "remembrance," are you still saved? If it means so little to you that you will actually "forget" about it, would anyone suggest they were ever saved to start with?
I ask someone if they believe Jesus died for their sins, and they say, "I do not remember," are they saved? Or maybe they "forgot" that Jesus was buried or that He rose from the dead? Would the ramifications merely be that they lost their resurrection? It is reminiscent of the Hebrews Paul wrote:
Hebrews 2:1-3 KJV
1 Therefore we ought to give the more earnest heed to the things which we have heard, lest at any time we should let them slip.
2 For if the word spoken by angels was stedfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward;
3 How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;
It just sounds odd that we would say, "Your eternal salvation is secured by believing and/or doing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6... but you only need to remember 1, 2, and 3 to be resurrected. Could you be saved without 1, 2, and 3? No. So, the logic that suggested these verses only apply to the resurrection does not appear to work.