House GOP demands unredacted records of Biden using pseudonym while VP

[Valletta]

Emails previously released by the Archives and retrieved from Hunter’s abandoned laptop reveal that Joe Biden used the email address “Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov” while he was President Barack Obama’s second-in-command and that his aide John Flynn cc’d Hunter on 10 emails containing the elder Biden’s daily schedule between May 18 and June 15, 2016.

Comer’s request covers records using Biden’s other known pseudonyms — “Robin Ware” and “JRB Ware” — and makes pointed requests for certain documents, such as drafts of Biden’s December 2015 speech to Ukraine’s parliament.

House GOP demands unredacted records of Biden using pseudonym while VP

“The National Archives must provide these unredacted records to further our investigation into the Biden family’s corruption,” the Kentucky Republican said.

nypost.com

With all of the shell corporations and pseudonyms it is hard to track the bribery. If not for the Hunter Biden laptop there would have been little chance to catch the Bidens.

 

[Pommer]

Emails previously released by the Archives and retrieved from Hunter’s abandoned laptop reveal that Joe Biden used the email address “Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov” while he was President Barack Obama’s second-in-command and that his aide John Flynn cc’d Hunter on 10 emails containing the elder Biden’s daily schedule between May 18 and June 15, 2016.

Comer’s request covers records using Biden’s other known pseudonyms — “Robin Ware” and “JRB Ware” — and makes pointed requests for certain documents, such as drafts of Biden’s December 2015 speech to Ukraine’s parliament.

House GOP demands unredacted records of Biden using pseudonym while VP

“The National Archives must provide these unredacted records to further our investigation into the Biden family’s corruption,” the Kentucky Republican said.

nypost.com

With all of the shell corporations and pseudonyms it is hard to track the bribery. If not for the Hunter Biden laptop there would have been little chance to catch the Bidens.

Bribery that didn’t happen would be hard to find too.

 

[Valletta]

Bribery that didn’t happen would be hard to find too.

There's enough for charges right now. The prosecutor had already seized assets of the CEO of Burisma. Burisma, which is paying Hunter Biden a hefty sum, wants the prosecutor gone. Joe Biden, using U.S. taxpayer money as leverage, got the prosecutor fired. That's enough for bribery charges.

 

[Pommer]

There's enough for charges right now. The prosecutor had already seized assets of the CEO of Burisma. Burisma, which is paying Hunter Biden a hefty sum, wants the prosecutor gone. Joe Biden, using U.S. taxpayer money as leverage, get the prosecutor fired. That's enough for bribery charges.

Which country is set to prefer charges of bribery against ??? Hunter Biden?

 

[Valletta]

Which country is set to prefer charges of bribery against ??? Hunter Biden?

Joe provided the service, his family member got the money. Thus the bribery charges should be filed by the U.S. House of Representatives under articles of impeachment. So far three pseudonyms used by Joe have been uncovered, and at least twenty shell corporations by the Biden family, so the extent of the crimes is still unknown.

 

[Pommer]

Joe provided the service, his family member got the money. Thus the bribery charges should be filed by the U.S. House of Representatives under articles of impeachment. So far three pseudonyms used by Joe have been uncovered, and at least twenty shell corporations by the Biden family, so the extent of the crimes is still unknown.

How did Joe “provide the service”?
(Are we really going to to do this again?)

Think about whatever “bad things Joe did”, that you’d like; ain’t nothing gonna happen.
Because there is no “crime”.

 

[comana]

Emails previously released by the Archives and retrieved from Hunter’s abandoned laptop reveal that Joe Biden used the email address “Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov” while he was President Barack Obama’s second-in-command and that his aide John Flynn cc’d Hunter on 10 emails containing the elder Biden’s daily schedule between May 18 and June 15, 2016.

Comer’s request covers records using Biden’s other known pseudonyms — “Robin Ware” and “JRB Ware” — and makes pointed requests for certain documents, such as drafts of Biden’s December 2015 speech to Ukraine’s parliament.

House GOP demands unredacted records of Biden using pseudonym while VP

“The National Archives must provide these unredacted records to further our investigation into the Biden family’s corruption,” the Kentucky Republican said.

nypost.com

With all of the shell corporations and pseudonyms it is hard to track the bribery. If not for the Hunter Biden laptop there would have been little chance to catch the Bidens.

Yawn. He used email aliases and it’s all in the national archives. Doesn’t sound like some nefarious plan to hide anything when it was still government email and it’s all available in the archives.

 

[Valletta]

How did Joe “provide the service”?
(Are we really going to to do this again?)

Think about whatever “bad things Joe did”, that you’d like; ain’t nothing gonna happen.
Because there is no “crime”.

Let's put the shell corporations and the money funneled to the Bidens aside for the moment and consider just the Burisma situation. Burisma wanted the prosecutor fired, a prosecutor who had already seized assets of the CEO of Burisma. Joe saw that the prosecutor was fired, he's caught on a recording bragging about leveraging 1 billion dollars of U.S. taxpayer dollars to get the prosecutor fired. Hunter continues to get paid a nice sum of money, a guy with no experience and someone who at least had been a drug addict. In May of 2016 only one person(Hunter, at his business email) is cc'd on an email to Robert L. Peters about Joe having an upcoming meeting with the Ukrainian president. Robert L. Peters is one of three pseudonyms for Joe Biden we know of so far. Why is Hunter's business email receiving information on U.S. foreign policy? In order for there to be a bribery conviction it would have to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a "quid pro quo." Does a father who knows nothing about a son's business dealings call his son at twenty-plus business meetings when he is offering nothing?

 

[Valletta]

Yawn. He used email aliases and it’s all in the national archives. Doesn’t sound like some nefarious plan to hide anything when it was still government email and it’s all available in the archives.

If not for Hunter losing track of his laptop no one would ever know about the pseudonyms. Hunter was not part of the government, the emails to Hunter went to his business address. What are the chances that the emails will not be lost or destroyed like Hillary's emails?

 

[comana]

If not for Hunter losing track of his laptop no one would ever know about the pseudonyms. Hunter was not part of the government, the emails to Hunter went to his business address. What are the chances that the emails will not be lost or destroyed like Hillary's emails?

Sounds like Comer is trying to create drama again will will amount to the same nothing every other big discovery has.

 

[Valletta]

Sounds like Comer is trying to create drama again will will amount to the same nothing every other big discovery has.

The criminal activity is evident, over twenty shell corporations and three pseudonyms. Those were obviously set up to hide what was going on.

 

[comana]

The criminal activity is evident, over twenty shell corporations and three pseudonyms. Those were obviously set up to hide what was going on.

No, it’s not obvious. What is obvious is Comer and other Congress members spinning a story of suggested criminal actions that never develop. The suggestion has all the effect they are looking for, well with their own base anyway.

 

[Valletta]

No, it’s not obvious. What is obvious is Comer and other Congress members spinning a story of suggested criminal actions that never develop. The suggestion has all the effect they are looking for, well with their own base anyway.

No spin. Three pseudonyms and 20 plus shell corporations and witnesses and whistleblowers coming forward saying Joe and the rest took in millions. If the Biden grandchildren and relatives could provide some kind of evidence that they did a job to earn the money and give an explanation as to why taxes were not paid it would go a long way toward showing innocence. But they've had plenty of time.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Bribery that didn’t happen would be hard to find too.

OK, but what about Obama time machine bribery?

James Comer claims that Biden pseudonym email was code. That’s nonsense.​

“Joe Biden was using a pseudonym and he copied his son about a shady, shady transaction where Joe Biden was going to leverage American tax dollars to save his son’s butt. … Along the same time period, we found a pseudonym where he copied Hunter Biden and it would lead one to believe that this was Joe Biden’s way of copying Hunter Biden to say, okay, send it to the Burisma owners and tell them help is on the way, and five days later, Joe Biden flew to Ukraine to begin the process of firing the prosecutor in exchange for America tax dollars in the form of foreign aid.”
— Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), in an interview with Newsmax, Aug. 29

Newsmax flashed an image of the email, sent from an assistant to the vice president to the address of “Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov.” The email listed the vice president’s schedule for the day, including a planned call with the Ukrainian president, who then was Petro Poroshenko. Hunter Biden was copied on the email.

But there’s one big problem with Comer’s claim: The email is dated May 26, 2016. The prosecutor in question had been dismissed by the Ukrainian parliament two months earlier.

 

[Valletta]

OK, but what about Obama time machine bribery?

James Comer claims that Biden pseudonym email was code. That’s nonsense.​

“Joe Biden was using a pseudonym and he copied his son about a shady, shady transaction where Joe Biden was going to leverage American tax dollars to save his son’s butt. … Along the same time period, we found a pseudonym where he copied Hunter Biden and it would lead one to believe that this was Joe Biden’s way of copying Hunter Biden to say, okay, send it to the Burisma owners and tell them help is on the way, and five days later, Joe Biden flew to Ukraine to begin the process of firing the prosecutor in exchange for America tax dollars in the form of foreign aid.”
— Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), in an interview with Newsmax, Aug. 29

Newsmax flashed an image of the email, sent from an assistant to the vice president to the address of “Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov.” The email listed the vice president’s schedule for the day, including a planned call with the Ukrainian president, who then was Petro Poroshenko. Hunter Biden was copied on the email.

But there’s one big problem with Comer’s claim: The email is dated May 26, 2016. The prosecutor in question had been dismissed by the Ukrainian parliament two months earlier.

Why is Hunter Biden receiving U.S. government information on Ukraine at Hunter Biden's business email address? Why won't the National Archives turn over all of the emails? Let's put them out there for all to see, this is old business that has nothing to do with today's national security? Joe brags about transparency.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Why is Hunter Biden receiving U.S. government information on Ukraine at Hunter Biden's business email address? Why won't the National Archives turn over all of the emails? Let's put them out there for all to see, this is old business that has nothing to do with today's national security? Joe brags about transparency.

US government information on Ukraine? There isn't any. Look at the email. It has the Veep's schedule for the day. It does include a call with Poroshenko [but no topic is listed], but it also notes when Joe will be arriving at his home in Delaware. Maybe they had a chance for some father-son time at the lake house.

 

[Valletta]

US government information on Ukraine? There isn't any. Look at the email. It has the Veep's schedule for the day. It does include a call with Poroshenko [but no topic is listed], but it also notes when Joe will be arriving at his home in Delaware. Maybe they had a chance for some father-son time at the lake house.

The White House asserted 'executive privilege' in order to withhold the release of 200 emails in their entirety, saying their release would disclose 'confidential advice between the President and his advisors.'

Hunter Biden's firm and Joe's VP office exchanged over 1,000 emails

New records reveal that then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter's investment firm Rosemont Seneca exchanged over 1,000 emails during his time as the No. 2 most powerful politician.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Pommer]

The White House asserted 'executive privilege' in order to withhold the release of 200 emails in their entirety, saying their release would disclose 'confidential advice between the President and his advisors.'

Hunter Biden's firm and Joe's VP office exchanged over 1,000 emails

New records reveal that then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter's investment firm Rosemont Seneca exchanged over 1,000 emails during his time as the No. 2 most powerful politician.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Wow that looks suspicious!
Except it doesn’t.

 

[Valletta]

Wow that looks suspicious!
Except it doesn’t.

So this is the White House that brags about transparency, we have emails from long ago that are a no longer timely that were OK to share with Hunter at a private business email (that means IT there and who knows who else had access), Hunter being a drug addict, but now so important in their content TEN OR SO YEARS LATER that they cannot be viewed at all by Congress or the American people! They have not even released the subject line nor the date, do you think that national security would be compromised if we found out the actual dates? We also know that Joe lied about never even discussing business with Hunter. It is illegal to withhold records under the FOIA because they might reveal a crime or even be just embarrassing.

 

[Pommer]

So this is the White House that brags about transparency, we have emails from long ago that are a no longer timely that were OK to share with Hunter at a private business email (that means IT there and who knows who else had access), Hunter being a drug addict, but now so important in their content TEN OR SO YEARS LATER that they cannot be viewed at all by Congress or the American people! They have not even released the subject line nor the date, do you think that national security would be compromised if we found out the actual dates? We also know that Joe lied about never even discussing business with Hunter. It is illegal to withhold records under the FOIA because they might reveal a crime or even be just embarrassing.

What was the third word after the second “blah”?
Molehills into MOUNTIANS.