GOP: We know Joe Biden is corrupt even if there is no evidence of it!

[NxNW]

MSCBC: GOP reconsiders whether anti-Biden evidence actually matters​

For months, congressional Republicans and their allies have gone to great lengths to manufacture a scandal that doesn’t appear to exist. To hear these GOP voices tell it, President Joe Biden was not only involved in his son’s business schemes, the Democrat also accepted alleged “bribes,” trading policies for cash.

Of course, the more Republicans try to substantiate these allegations with facts, the more they fail spectacularly. Indeed, it happened again yesterday, as GOP officials on the House Oversight Committee released documents showing that members of Biden’s family, and “associates” who know members of the president’s family, received money from foreign sources — a rather boring observation — while failing once again to make any meaningful connections to the president himself.

In his latest underwhelming release, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer explicitly said Republicans simply don’t feel the need to “show payments directly to the President to show corruption.” Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, another Republican member of the panel, soon after appeared on Fox News and pushed a similar line, suggesting the party’s case against the incumbent president would still have merit, even if Biden didn’t “take a dime.”

A Washington Post analysis added, “[Comer’s] team tried to dig up this bribe that they have convinced their allies exists, without luck. So he issues a news release about the ‘Biden family’ and suggests that bribery claims don’t need actual proof and prepares for his next Sean Hannity interview.”
Where are the tapes?

Where are the bank records?

Anyone?

Bueller?

 

[USincognito]

MSCBC: GOP reconsiders whether anti-Biden evidence actually matters​

For months, congressional Republicans and their allies have gone to great lengths to manufacture a scandal that doesn’t appear to exist. To hear these GOP voices tell it, President Joe Biden was not only involved in his son’s business schemes, the Democrat also accepted alleged “bribes,” trading policies for cash.

Of course, the more Republicans try to substantiate these allegations with facts, the more they fail spectacularly. Indeed, it happened again yesterday, as GOP officials on the House Oversight Committee released documents showing that members of Biden’s family, and “associates” who know members of the president’s family, received money from foreign sources — a rather boring observation — while failing once again to make any meaningful connections to the president himself.

In his latest underwhelming release, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer explicitly said Republicans simply don’t feel the need to “show payments directly to the President to show corruption.” Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, another Republican member of the panel, soon after appeared on Fox News and pushed a similar line, suggesting the party’s case against the incumbent president would still have merit, even if Biden didn’t “take a dime.”

A Washington Post analysis added, “[Comer’s] team tried to dig up this bribe that they have convinced their allies exists, without luck. So he issues a news release about the ‘Biden family’ and suggests that bribery claims don’t need actual proof and prepares for his next Sean Hannity interview.”
Where are the tapes?

Where are the bank records?

Anyone?

Bueller?

Comer is basically admitting it's a witch hunt and they're going to keep searching until they find one - whether it exists or not.

 

[Handmaid for Jesus]

Comer is basically admitting it's a witch hunt and they're going to keep searching until they find one - whether it exists or not.

Isn't it funny how they can "know Biden is corrupt" without any evidence while at the same time they disavow the corruption of the ex-president with tons of evidence.

 

[NxNW]

Isn't it funny how they can "know Biden is corrupt" without any evidence while at the same time they disavow the corruption of the ex-president with tons of evidence.

Just because Trump was selling pardons for $2M a pop doesn't mean there was anything corrupt about it!

 

[Pommer]

MSCBC: GOP reconsiders whether anti-Biden evidence actually matters​

For months, congressional Republicans and their allies have gone to great lengths to manufacture a scandal that doesn’t appear to exist. To hear these GOP voices tell it, President Joe Biden was not only involved in his son’s business schemes, the Democrat also accepted alleged “bribes,” trading policies for cash.

Of course, the more Republicans try to substantiate these allegations with facts, the more they fail spectacularly. Indeed, it happened again yesterday, as GOP officials on the House Oversight Committee released documents showing that members of Biden’s family, and “associates” who know members of the president’s family, received money from foreign sources — a rather boring observation — while failing once again to make any meaningful connections to the president himself.

In his latest underwhelming release, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer explicitly said Republicans simply don’t feel the need to “show payments directly to the President to show corruption.” Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, another Republican member of the panel, soon after appeared on Fox News and pushed a similar line, suggesting the party’s case against the incumbent president would still have merit, even if Biden didn’t “take a dime.”

A Washington Post analysis added, “[Comer’s] team tried to dig up this bribe that they have convinced their allies exists, without luck. So he issues a news release about the ‘Biden family’ and suggests that bribery claims don’t need actual proof and prepares for his next Sean Hannity interview.”
Where are the tapes?

Where are the bank records?

Anyone?

Bueller?

Who needs evidence when one has faith?
Yet another example of why one should not mix religion & poilitics.

 

[eleos1954]

MSCBC: GOP reconsiders whether anti-Biden evidence actually matters​

For months, congressional Republicans and their allies have gone to great lengths to manufacture a scandal that doesn’t appear to exist. To hear these GOP voices tell it, President Joe Biden was not only involved in his son’s business schemes, the Democrat also accepted alleged “bribes,” trading policies for cash.

Of course, the more Republicans try to substantiate these allegations with facts, the more they fail spectacularly. Indeed, it happened again yesterday, as GOP officials on the House Oversight Committee released documents showing that members of Biden’s family, and “associates” who know members of the president’s family, received money from foreign sources — a rather boring observation — while failing once again to make any meaningful connections to the president himself.

In his latest underwhelming release, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer explicitly said Republicans simply don’t feel the need to “show payments directly to the President to show corruption.” Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, another Republican member of the panel, soon after appeared on Fox News and pushed a similar line, suggesting the party’s case against the incumbent president would still have merit, even if Biden didn’t “take a dime.”

A Washington Post analysis added, “[Comer’s] team tried to dig up this bribe that they have convinced their allies exists, without luck. So he issues a news release about the ‘Biden family’ and suggests that bribery claims don’t need actual proof and prepares for his next Sean Hannity interview.”
Where are the tapes?

Where are the bank records?

Anyone?

Bueller?

A lot of talk going on ..... nothing happens with Biden unless the Republicans take it in front of a court of law (judge). Even the step of "Investigative Inquiry" is not doing that .... it's just more investigation. Until something goes before a judge .... everything is pretty well meaningless and a bunch of talk.

So no it don't take evidence to have an Investigative Inquiry .... It will take evidence to bring it before a judge.

 

[USincognito]

A lot of talk going on ..... nothing happens with Biden unless the Republicans take it in front of a court of law (judge). Even the step of "Investigative Inquiry" is not doing that .... it's just more investigation. Until something goes before a judge .... everything is pretty well meaningless and a bunch of talk.

That's the thing. They don't care if he's actually corrupt or not (since so many of them are too). It's about innuendo and the suggestion of corruption. That's why Donald didn't need for Zolenskyy to actually investigate Biden, just make the announcement. He'd then flood the zone with "Zolenskyy investigation Biden, see I told he was corrupt" and the low information voters go, "hmm, if there's smoke there's fire, he must be corrupt".

 

[Brihaha]

Republicans are still searching for anything to justify their allegations, never mind crimes lol. Their voters deserve the entire pile of nothing they're fed.

 

[Pommer]

That's the thing. They don't care if he's actually corrupt or not (since so many of them are too). It's about innuendo and the suggestion of corruption. That's why Donald didn't need for Zolenskyy to actually investigate Biden, just make the announcement. He'd then flood the zone with "Zolenskyy investigation Biden, see I told he was corrupt" and the low information voters go, "hmm, if there's smoke there's fire, he must be corrupt".

This mashup of “A Face in the Crowd” and “Citizen Kane” is running long.

 

[Pommer]

Isn't it funny how they can "know Biden is corrupt" without any evidence while at the same time they disavow the corruption of the ex-president with tons of evidence.

It’s like this:
“Biden is President*, he runs the DOJ, the DOJ is currently ‘going-after President Trump’, ipso facto, Biden is using the power of the government to stop a political rival.”

Therefore any evidence against President Trump is suspect and probably phony.

And here we are.

 

[loveofourlord]

Isn't it funny how they can "know Biden is corrupt" without any evidence while at the same time they disavow the corruption of the ex-president with tons of evidence.

I've been thinking all of that with the hunter biden stuff, if there is a reason to have biden cahrged for all that go ahead, but i think that also would take down their trump for all the stuff he's done just as bad if not worse.

 

[NxNW]

It's been a week; have they found any actual evidence?

 

[Pommer]

It's been a week; have they found any actual evidence?

Bigfoot has it.

 

[Pommer]

I've been thinking all of that with the hunter biden stuff, if there is a reason to have biden cahrged for all that go ahead, but i think that also would take down their trump for all the stuff he's done just as bad if not worse.

Yeah, “lock him up” if he done the deeds*.
The thing though is that the Right will stick up for Jared and Ivanka and expects the Left to do the same and we don’t and they can’t understand that, and that angers them the more.

*misdemeanor tax-charges were dropped today…so…the gun change?

 

[Valletta]

Comer is basically admitting it's a witch hunt and they're going to keep searching until they find one - whether it exists or not.

The truth is there is already enough evidence to charge Joe with bribery, the MSNBC article misleads--if Hunter received money for Joe's intervention with Burisma, that is bribery.

 

[wing2000]

nm

 

[NxNW]

This thread is 3 weeks old now; have they found any actual evidence?

 

[Handmaid for Jesus]

This thread is 3 weeks old now; have they found any actual evidence?

I have not heard of any.

 

[JustOneWay]

This thread is 3 weeks old now; have they found any actual evidence?

That is the funny thing about evidence, if they had it there would have already been action.

 

[wing2000]

This thread is 3 weeks old now; have they found any actual evidence?

Mr Comer is taking a break. Stay tuned....I'm sure his committee will be feeding additional "evidence" to "Western Journal", "Washington Times" and other find publications.