SilverBear
Well-Known Member
you get a gold star for noticing thatWait, wait, wait. This is just a survey of patient opinions? I was confidently assured that these were meaningless a few pages back.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
you get a gold star for noticing thatWait, wait, wait. This is just a survey of patient opinions? I was confidently assured that these were meaningless a few pages back.
Your words, not mine.The important thing to remember, though, is that Christians love the sinner.
Well, no, no you were not. What I was describing is really not complex, and dramatically different from what you are writing here.Wait, wait, wait. This is just a survey of patient opinions? I was confidently assured that these were meaningless a few pages back.
Cool. Welcome to the list.If you ignore enough users, you can essentially create your own space! Pretty novel idea. Echo chambers are very comfortable.
Sorry that just isn't true. Even studies done internally at ex-gay religious programs using strictly adults committed to the process show the same if not worse results. No one changes orientation, not even among adults fully committed to the idea of conversion. Sadly the potential for harm is much much worse for these people. When your motivations for participation are based on your faith - what happens to that faith when you realize that no, you can't pray the gay away?
I,m not informed enough to dispute what you say. What I can say though is that those practising conversion have not been able to show longitudinal objective evidence of any merit. On the contrary it has faced considerable complaints.
My interest in this topic is why is gay conversion is even attempted. Being gay in itself is it a sin?
Romans 1 26:28 26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones.
27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
28Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done.
In a nutshell the bible does not condone homosexual sexual acts
Jude 1: 7 In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.
Again the bible does not condone homosexual sexual acts or straight sexual acts outside of marriage. Perversion isnt defined though.
Now this then isnt about homosexuality - its about homosexual sex. Even heterosexual men are known to have committed sodomy or other sexual acts with men or animals. You dont have to be homosexual to commit a homosexual act... ie its well known that men may not be same sex attracted but will commit a same-sex sexual act
So I note theres been a lot of innaccurate comments about how god hates homosexuals etc etc - imo thats innaccurate - he does not condone a same sex sexual act regardless of ones sexual attraction ie straight bi or gay.
On that basis why is there a focus on not being gay - should the focus be on straight men/women and gay men/women not committing a same-sex sexual act.
In any case I dont support any of it and tend to think regardless of what you are thats noone elses business...thats another issue again.
I'm not disputing what you say. what I'm stating is that conversion therapies haven't been able to demonstrate longitudinal objective evidence of efficacyThis is the main political and ideological focus of Leftist politics right now. But do not let the propaganda blind you. People who were gay no longer are gay. It happens.
I agree that adults who are mentally competent and are fully informed of the details of treatment, has the right to access a therapy. That's altogether different for minorsYou are right the bible sees all of us as made in Gods image yet somehow broken by sin. The actions we perform are the crucial guide to how we play the cards we were dealt.
For example regular drunkeness is something some people are more vulnerable to than others. As someone who has repented of this I know change is possible cause I have not had a drink in 20 years aside from communion wine which usually tastes awful.
Repentance is key to our response to God. This political ideological attempt to outlaw a form of repentance is deeply antiChristian.
When we stop believing change for the better is possible we start accepting that things are only going to get worse.
The Right to Counseling for Unwanted Same-Sex Attractions
I agree that adults who are mentally competent and are fully informed of the details of treatment, has the right to access a therapy. That's altogether different for minors
I'm not disputing what you say. what I'm stating is that conversion therapies haven't been able to demonstrate longitudinal objective evidence of efficacy
I cannot speak for the UK - but neither ideological agendas nor schooling has anything to do with the decision to exclude minors from gay conversion in my country. It has everything to do with all medical and psychological treatments needing to demonstrate safety, efficacy and appropriate governance and quality management. This is to stop individuals, companies and institutions doing dodgy practices that are potentially harmful. The practice of gay conversion has not been able to fulfil those standards which has to be regarded as a concern if it cannot demonstrate safety and efficacy.Biblically Bar Mitzwa was at 12 which was before the hormonal chaos of a persons emerging sexual identity. Today a parent is regarded as responsible for those years and the child is kept in state institutions pushing leftist ideological agendas through school and then often higher education. If a minor is in agreement with the goals I see no problem here. If it is forced on him then it will not work and especially since the false virtue signalling of his environment will leave him confused.
Where are you getting that information. Can you please attach the link showing the research into gay conversion was from those that were gay activists - or are you just espousing something you thinkAs the link I shared demonstrated many of these socalled scientific reviews were composed by biased often mainly gay activist participants. They do not demonstrate what you assume.
These are called facts.Today a parent is regarded as responsible for those years and the child is kept in state institutions pushing leftist ideological agendas through school and then often higher education.
I am happy to discuss facts but no-one to date has shown that evidence.These are called facts.
I had not looked at this link before but when i read your post i guessed the link was for something from Focus on the Family (and i was right) Focus has a long history of making these false claims.As the link I shared demonstrated many of these socalled scientific reviews were composed by biased often mainly gay activist participants. They do not demonstrate what you assume.
These are called facts.
I am happy to discuss facts but no-one to date has shown that evidence.
I cannot speak for the UK - but neither ideological agendas nor schooling has anything to do with the decision to exclude minors from gay conversion in my country. It has everything to do with all medical and psychological treatments needing to demonstrate safety, efficacy and appropriate governance and quality management. This is to stop individuals, companies and institutions doing dodgy practices that are potentially harmful. The practice of gay conversion has not been able to fulfil those standards which has to be regarded as a concern if it cannot demonstrate safety and efficacy.
Now if adults none the less want to proceed so be it. That's a different case for minors, and although you are advocating that minors can make complex treatment decisions at age 12 and should be free to do what they wish, our government disagrees with you; and I suspect yours does too.
I had not looked at this link before but when i read your post i guessed the link was for something from Focus on the Family (and i was right) Focus has a long history of making these false claims.
I read this entire link but stooped counting the number of false statements when I hit 12.
at no point the Focus demonstrate that ANY of "these socalled scientific reviews were composed by biased often mainly gay activist participants."
even if they did manage to demonstrate that it wouldn't show the findings of the research to be false.