The details you refuse to pay attention to in your partial quote is in what you left out to prove your false doctrine. Your verse says also transgresses. It doesn't say only transgresses. Here's the complete verse and sentence:Will you be saying that each time I insist that it is a 'sin' even for Christians to "take God's name in vain" since even in the NT - "Sin IS transgression of the LAW" -- 1 John 3:4
Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
Doesn't work very well does it since you don't keep the ten commandments, notably the 4th you hollar about so much.1 John 2:1 "these things I write to you that you sin not"
Talk about creative writing. Your intention is Paul is saying we're obligated to the law when in fact he says we're dead to the law and we're now delivered from the law. That isn't my creative writing. I speak about Romans 6 and 7 which have been quoted for you more than once.Interesting creative writing ... Paul never says it - but you do. Paul gives his own definition for that term in Romans 3:19-20 as we all know by now.
Where do you find me saying taking God's name in vain isn't sin? You're doing nothing more than trying to prove I keep part of the law. Simply isn't true. Sin was before the law, remember Romans 5:13. Oh yeah that's creative writing. So is Galatians 3:19 which says sin (transgression) is the reason the law came. It also says the law went.So once again - will you be saying that each time I insist that it is a 'sin' even for Christians to "take God's name in vain" since even in the NT - "Sin IS transgression of the LAW" -- 1 John 3:4
What you're really saying is I don't believe and haven't converted to your church.1 John 2:1 "these things I write to you that you sin not"
It appears you are not paying enough attention to the detail in the posts.
No that's what you try to do. So require is correct. If it wasn't for your amending the 4th you wouldn't be keeping it either. The truth all see is you don't line up with the commandments in performance. This too has been discussed a few times.Not in real life. In real life my posts do not require falsely accusing anyone of anything.
Yes it is.I find your logic "illusive" just then since it is the details in scripture that I keep reminding you of in my posts.
As stated before ... it is still a "sin" even for Christians "to take God's name in vain" Exodus 20:7 and we all know it.
What point? Christians are obligated to keep the law. Why do you refuse to believe the details the Scripture you won't discuss?The point remains.
Upvote
0