Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why do Masons tend to refer to non-Masons as Profane? Cordially, Skip.Simpleman25 said:If anyone has questions concerning freemasonry, feel free to ask it here.
Why do Masons tend to refer to non-Masons as Profane? Cordially, Skip.
Guess that answered his question.
Anyone else with a question about freemasonry?
There are numerous masons on this site with lots of knowledge.
Even us without lots of knowledge are willing to talk with others who have honest questions.
I think Masonry has redefined the word for its own reasons. Here's how dictionary dot com has it:
pro·fane (adj.)
1. characterized by irreverence or contempt for God or sacred principles or things; irreligious.
2. not devoted to holy or religious purposes; unconsecrated; secular (opposed to sacred ).
3. unholy; heathen; pagan: profane rites.
4. not initiated into religious rites or mysteries, as persons.
5. common or vulgar.
Latin profānus literally, before (outside of) the temple;
Defining it as "those men and women who stand outside of Masonry" is not consistent with the actual definition. The only way Masons can refer to non-Masons as 'profane' is if they view Freemasonry as of divine origin and in existence for holy, sacred or religious reasons.
You 'work' in lodges erected to God, around sacred altars and indicate that such work occurs in the very presence of God. That is why Masons have historically referred to non-Masons as 'profane,' and your hesitance to keep to the true definition shows it's something that you are not willing to reveal. Cordially, Skip.
Partially true. What I specifically asked was:Simpleman25 said:Your question was how do masons use the word profane.
To say it just refers to non-Masons is not totally true in that it misses the impact of the term itself. According to your view, 'profane' simply equals 'non-Mason' and I'd say it goes much deeper than just that.Why do Masons tend to refer to non-Masons as Profane?
I don't believe 4a and b can be separated, and they together capture the reason why Masons have chosen the term: non-Masons have not been initiated into the esoteric (hidden) knowledge of Freemasonry. It pictures how Masons view the rest of the world: as a group of blind, ignorant people standing outside the gates of the Temple of Masonry, separated from the truth and that which is holy.1: not concerned with religion or religious purposes : secular
2: not holy because unconsecrated, impure, or defiled : unsanctified
3a: serving to debase or defile what is holy : irreverent
b: obscene, vulgar
4a: not being among the initiated
b: not possessing esoteric or expert knowledge
Ok: Masonic Lodges are 'erected to God' and in many GL jurisdictions, the candidate takes his obligations in the very presence of God, according to the rituals in those jurisdictions. To what deity does that refer? Is it the Biblical version, the Koranic version, the Hindu, Buddhist, Mormon version? Cordially, Skip.Next question.
Partially true. What I specifically asked was:To say it just refers to non-Masons is not totally true in that it misses the impact of the term itself. According to your view, 'profane' simply equals 'non-Mason' and I'd say it goes much deeper than just that.
Amerianvet took a different source and highlighted one of the definitions:
I don't believe 4a and b can be separated, and they together capture the reason why Masons have chosen the term: non-Masons have not been initiated into the esoteric (hidden) knowledge of Freemasonry. It pictures how Masons view the rest of the world: as a group of blind, ignorant people standing outside the gates of the Temple of Masonry, separated from the truth and that which is holy.
Ok: Masonic Lodges are 'erected to God' and in many GL jurisdictions, the candidate takes his obligations in the very presence of God, according to the rituals in those jurisdictions. To what deity does that refer? Is it the Biblical version, the Koranic version, the Hindu, Buddhist, Mormon version? Cordially, Skip.
I'll finish the comments concerning profane before answering your newest question.
First of all you asked a question and it was answered by more than one mason. All of us agree on the answers.
The issue with your response to our answers is simple. You used your personal opinion without facts to back it up. You used the terms, 'i think' and 'i believe'. I gave you a specific definition without personal opinion.
An issue I have with your comments concerning non masons being blind and ignorant. That is strictly your assumption. None of us on here consider non masons to be ignorant. That again is your assumption.
Your opinions are duly noted.
Well, there we have it: if you all agree, you must be right. An interesting position to take, but one more reflective of the 'better man' conceit generally exhibited by Masons than a logical proposition.All of us agree on the answers.
I usually ensure my opinions are separated from the facts upon which they are based. According to your lights, if I state anything as a fact, you'll believe it. Nah.....You used your personal opinion without facts to back it up. You used the terms, 'i think' and 'i believe'.
You consulted a Masonic website to define the term, which is little removed from a personal opinion. Your quote even noted that the word is not used in the normal way within Freemasonry, but is altered to fit a Masonic viewpoint. I'll say more about that in a separate thread.I gave you a specific definition without personal opinion.
You may not, but 'Freemasonry' certainly does. I'll deal with that separately.None of us on here consider non masons to be ignorant. That again is your assumption.
Still waiting for your answer. Since you are apparently hesitant about answering that question, I've narrowed the answer down to two: 1) whatever god the individual Mason believes in; 2) the universal god that Masonry actually teaches. H.W. Coil phrased it perfectly:I'll finish the comments concerning profane before answering your newest question.
Cordially, Skip.Men have to decide whether they want a God like the ancient Hebrew Jahweh, a partisan, tribal God, with whom they can talk and argue and from whom they can hide if necessary, or a boundless, eternal, universal, undenominational, and international, Divine Spirit, so vastly removed from the speck called man, that He cannot be known, named, or approached.(Coil's Masonic Encyclopedia, 1st edition, pg. 516)
I don't believe 4a and b can be separated, and they together capture the reason why Masons have chosen the term: non-Masons have not been initiated into the esoteric (hidden) knowledge of Freemasonry. It pictures how Masons view the rest of the world: as a group of blind, ignorant people standing outside the gates of the Temple of Masonry, separated from the truth and that which is holy.
Ok: Masonic Lodges are 'erected to God' and in many GL jurisdictions, the candidate takes his obligations in the very presence of God, according to the rituals in those jurisdictions. To what deity does that refer? Is it the Biblical version, the Koranic version, the Hindu, Buddhist, Mormon version? Cordially, Skip.
So your refusal to answer my questions is because you believe I don't want my own questions answered? Pretty lame excuse, I'd say. Cordially, Skip.circuitrider said:You do know that Skip doesn't actually want answers to his questions don't you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?