They are nothing but pure shabby fraud.
Not one of them has ever come up with squat to justify their quixotic quest for the "cambrian bunny" to falsify evolution.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Creation and I.D. "Researchers" rarely do their own research. They just critique what others do, then complain that research that would falsify evolution (or "Darwinism") never gets done. Behe is a good example of this, despite the fact that the Discovery Institute, which he is a shining star of, collects millions of dollars every year.
They are nothing but pure shabby fraud.
Not one of them has ever come up with squat to justify their quixotic quest for the "cambrian bunny" to falsify evolution.
The limitses, ...it burns.This isn't evidence for Darwinism.
News to Note, June 6, 2009 - Answers in Genesis
And where is the molecular data? What we do observe happening is adaptation with limits (in some cases, quite severe constraints).
You do if you claim 2 billion years was involved! Yes a clock is made by man, but like Pluto, they are in man's realm.An alarm clock was made by us. Pluto isn't, and we can still predict it. My point was simply that we don't have to observe all 2 billion years of life on earth to determine evolution is real.
I base it on the screaming fact that your common knowledge is actually anything but knowledge.Imaginary time you say? What do you base that on? It's pretty common knowledge that the earth is 4.6 billions years old. So what is it that makes you reject the 2 billion years?
Because we have actually observed how it has happened. The evidence is overwhelming. One example is these lizards who showed rapid progress in evolution when moved to a new home.
Lizards Undergo Rapid Evolution After Introduction To A New Home
No. Your dates are irrelevant, because they are belief time, not real time.We know that's not the case as we've found fossils that are houndred of millions years old, so your question is irrelevant
It has been observed by millions. Tested. Proven. Repeated. You merely need to deal with it, not reinvent the wheel here.So it can't be predicted, it can't be demonstrated, observed or proven. So why are you making the assertion that there is a God of the bible?
You do if you claim 2 billion years was involved! Yes a clock is made by man, but like Pluto, they are in man's realm.
I base it on the screaming fact that your common knowledge is actually anything but knowledge.
So?? Evolution is a created trait. What part of that are you missing??
No. Your dates are irrelevant, because they are belief time, not real time.
It has been observed by millions. Tested. Proven. Repeated. You merely need to deal with it, not reinvent the wheel here.
You say it's belief time, because the bible says the world is 6000 years old.
The reason it is belief time is because science uses a belief that the present laws applied. Not because of the bible. The bible is merely how I know that your belief should be questioned.You say it's belief time, because the bible says the world is 6000 years old.
Source?
False. You did not observe a bird evolve. Nor man. Nor anything really. We merely have a partial record of the remains of creatures, and know some evolving has happened. How much, from what, when, are all subject to assumptions. The present evolving is no way to imagine how far past evolving happened.Biological evolution and an old Earth in a nutshell, so why the double standard?
The reason it is belief time is because science uses a belief that the present laws applied. Not because of the bible. The bible is merely how I know that your belief should be questioned.
The tested scriptures are not hidden in a closet. Nations were foretold in advance, and leaders, and Jesus, and etc etc. Get out more.
You keep forgetting to demonstrate empirically why present laws would not apply.
As for your claim that the bible predicted anything; evidence would suggest otherwise.
False. You did not observe a bird evolve. Nor man. Nor anything really. We merely have a partial record of the remains of creatures, and know some evolving has happened. How much, from what, when, are all subject to assumptions. The present evolving is no way to imagine how far past evolving happened.
I have an insanely hard time picking out the trolls and the fundies, anyone else have a similar problem?
And I should accept Creation because.. I observed it?False. You did not observe a bird evolve. Nor man. Nor anything really.
Come on dad, don't let this end up back at "the Bible's right because the Bible says so", surely even you can see that's possibly the dumbest argument ever made.We merely have a partial record of the remains of creatures, and know some evolving has happened. How much, from what, when, are all subject to assumptions. The present evolving is no way to imagine how far past evolving happened.
I truly believe ever "creationist" who argues against evolution in such a way that seems to spit in the face of common sense is a troll. I just can't bring myself to comprehend how they can be serious with some of these arguments i'm seeing. I really am trying hard, but I guess their reasoning is to complex for my simple mind to grasp.Welcome to Poe's Law country.
West Virginia?Evidence doesn't apply to dad. He's from a different 'state'.
1. We don't analyze texts based on beastmen. Also, texts on the civil war are true because texts on the civil war said so.And I should accept Creation because.. I observed it?
Come on dad, don't let this end up back at "the Bible's right because the Bible says so", surely even you can see that's possibly the dumbest argument ever made.
Why do you think God made this Earth with features and laws that make him look like a liar? Let's just skip over the part where you think you know the evidence better than all the world's physicists, geologists, palaeontologists, etc. and go right to a straight answer.
Actually you cannot beyond this state. Since you have no clue when that started or will end, you are lost.
Hand Wave Away, dad. But you said what you said.No. Nothing remotely close to that.
As apposed to being Molded from Clay.... Rrrrright.False, not in the way the myth of evolution envisions all life starting from a simple form.
Really, I don't even need to. I'm not a Scientist. There are far more qualified people on this Forum alone who'd be happy to cover that area so I needn't bother.Then you better stick to fruit flies in the last few decades or something you might know.
I truly believe ever "creationist" who argues against evolution in such a way that seems to spit in the face of common sense is a troll. I just can't bring myself to comprehend how they can be serious with some of these arguments i'm seeing. I really am trying hard, but I guess their reasoning is to complex for my simple mind to grasp.
1. We don't analyze texts based on beastmen. Also, texts on the civil war are true because texts on the civil war said so.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?