So you do not believe he is Word of Faith then, Arbiter.
So you do not believe he is Word of Faith then, Arbiter.
Me personally, no. Like I have said, I believe him to be just an extension of at least one church up in Canada that was a renegade out of the Vineyard movement. They even took their name back from them and denounced them years ago. People can decide for themselves from the clip.
I believe he only said the Hagin reference to try and purposely place himself in a more positive light with individuals that uphold his teachings.
It maybe as you say, but I felt that he genuinely was impressed with that one Hagin book. Not one of the many Bible based books, but the one book in which Hagin collates his visions. To me that seemed to impress Todd, rather than the Bible teachings.
@ Simon Peter,
You are critical of the Word of Faith?
You are further from the truth than I thought.
Ben,
I believe those who consider themselves 'Word of Faith' are part of the church. However, I strongly disagree with the WoF movement, their understanding of who God is, and many of their doctrines. Just as you are critical of those who don't believe as you do.
It's my hope that WoF believers will reject kenyon's and Hagin's approach to Christianity, for a more traditional Christian faith.
peace,
Simon
I can't speak for Kenyon, but I can for Hagin, since I taught at his school.
Kenneth Hagin's doctrinal stance is identical to the Assembly of God's because he used PC Nelson's outline, as did the AG.
Word of Faith (also known as Word-Faith or simply Faith) is a family of Christian churches[1] as well as a label applied by some observers to a teaching movement kindred to many Pentecostal and charismatic churches and individuals worldwide.
Word of Faith - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ben,
...
It's my hope that WoF believers will reject kenyon's and Hagin's approach to Christianity, for a more traditional Christian faith.
peace,
Simon
You're not affiliated with the AOG, or any denomination for that matter, nor do you have any established belief system that all followers of this movement adhere to.
Which is incorrect since you guys are not a denomination but a theological movement,..
You're not affiliated with the AOG, or any denomination for that matter, nor do you have any established belief system that all followers of this movement adhere to.
Really?
Can you provide, say..... ONE link to a church or ministry website that calls themselves Word of Faith and has a different doctrinal stance.
If you can do that, I'll agree with you.
Thanks Andy, for getting this thread back on topic.
I probably shouldn't say this, but the "Presence Movement" seems to be on the usual path towards polygamy. We have seen this happen so many times in the past. One of the movements core values is (2 Samuel 6:10-11), and Dutch Sheets compares his "visitation" to hosting of His Presence to Obed-edom hosting he Ark of the Covenant, also called "the Ark of His Presence".
I'm always looking for new ideas, but let hope that those guys don't start hosting David's polygamist Presence.
"And I gave thee thy master's house, and thy master's wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things." (2 Samuel 12:8).
Just a thought!
Who is talking about polygamy?
That is derailing the thread. What a elephant to hurl into the debate.
Well I think it is a bit rich to compare the theology of someone you disagree with to an ethical stance promoting polygamy!
I
So, which of the many doctrines noted above do you disagree with?
And please point out which ones are not lined up with your "more traditional" Christianity?
And how are they different from the Assemblies of God Doctrines?
Well, hoping is not going to get me to leave Hagin and Kenyon alone and go back to a powerless, defeated Christianity that almost turned me away from God for live and maybe eternity.
Seen too many miracles, too much good stuff to become a Word of doubt person again.
Blessings,
Benjamin