I see you skipped this one.
Quite a few folks have now called you on this inconsistency in your interpretation of Scripture.
Why did James, Jesus and Paul refer to parts of the whole law AND the ten commandments, not just the ten commandments?
Mat 5:18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.
Mat 5:19 Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
He then goes on to discuss the commands against murder, adultery vows, eye for eye, etc. both from the ten and the rest of the law.
And His greatest commandment and the one like it are from other parts of the law.
Jas 2:10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
In the passage James reiterates love your neighbor as yourself from Deuteronomy and Jesus' endorsement, and also references breaking the law through partiality, which is forbidden in Deut. Then he also references some of the ten.
Paul also addressed remarriage being possible after death in Rom. 7, then went on to discuss coveting, again the ten commandments with another portion of the law.
Your system just doesn't work if you ignore the texts.