- Sep 23, 2005
- 32,776
- 6,156
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
It is either completely removed from all christain requirements or it is not.
It is OK to kill or it is not. It is OK to commit adultery or it is not. It is OK to have other gods or it is not.
You can not have that "I am not saying you can do those things" and the 10 commandments are abolished. It is that simple.
It was not ok to kill BEFORE the ten commandments were given to Israel in stone.
The law given to Israel was one expression of lasting principles, given to a particular people, at a particular time, in the context of their land.
It is quite possible for a group NOT to be under that specific law code, yet still be under God's lasting moral principles.
To the degree that the specific law given to Israel spelled out moral commands more clearly than than they ever had been before, the law is still quite instructional. It also is instructional as an illustration of the plan of salvation, through the sacrificial system, etc.
But your idea that those who were not required to be under the mosaic law (which included the ten commandments in Deut.) must therefore reject being under moral direction is not true. It is a strawman.
Gentiles were not required to be circumcised or keep the law.
But they were under moral principles, many of which were spelled out in specific provisions of the law.
Upvote
0