To all:
This has been an interesting thread, but I want to expand on a few issues raised by Masons and non-Masons. So you know, I am a critic of Freemasonry and maintain the position that it is inconsistent with Biblical Christianity.
Point 1 - What hasn't been covered so far is what Masons actually build. In Freemasonry, the individual has a primary task of building a spiritual temple of his body, so it can become a fit dwelling place for God, whoever that might be. Here's a Masonic description of it:
Three times has man tried to build a temple wherein the Creator might dwell; three times he has failed. You now start to build the fourth temple, wherein God may reside, but this one is different, this one will be built in your heart. There God may finally dwell and rest - in your heart, and this temple shall never be destroyed, unless you destroy it - what an awesome responsibility. So stand there in the Northeast corner, where you were placed and where all buildings are begun and begin to build your own temple, a temple which may only be built with the help of Freemasonry. (IL GL, Intender Program - EA Guidebook, 2003, pg. 17)
So, this is the belief of Freemasonry. Your body will die, but we know with a sure and certain hope that the soul will live and while it lives by and through the principles and philosophy of Freemasonry it will, by reason of your building the Fourth Temple in your heart, be the home of GAOTU on earth and allow Him to bring his Kingdom into the world. (IL GL, Intender Program - MM Guidebook, 2003, Pg. 18)
All GL's refer to this building project to one degree or another, but the goal is the same in all U.S. jurisdictions, at least. It's goal is physical, moral and spiritual perfection so that 'god' will make his body a dwelling place. If the Mason does good work on his earthly temple, he will be used in the construction of the heavenly one, where he will be gladly accepted as a living stone for that temple. The view of the Masonic Spiritual Temple is one of the many ways in which Freemasonry offers salvation to its members.
Point 2 - It has been said that Freemasonry is not a religion, but the topic is much deeper than that. Masonic authors tend to differentiate between 'religion' and 'a religion.' The former refers to the fact that Masonry carries the fundamental elements of God's teachings to man, but leaves it to men to determine their meaning in his life. "A religion" refers to an organized religion, such as Baptists, Mormons, Catholics. They deny the latter characterization, but accept the former.
Deeper than this is whether or not they meet the fundamental definition of the word 'religion.' Masons generally refuse to provide a definition, for the obvious reason, but my analysis of Masonic teachings indicate it is indeed 'a religion' because it meets the definition of one.
Point 3 - A question was asked why the Shriners used so much Islamic symbolism, and it was answered that it was more Arabic than Islamic. This explanation papers over the fact that the Shriner initiation has the man swearing his acceptance of his obligations in Allah's name. The Allah of the Koran is not the God of the Bible, and those who can calmly swear on such an entity are in real ignorance of what they are doing.
Point 4 - Circuitrider made this statement:
It is true that Prince Hall was started because years ago Masonry was like many churches, racially divided, that has changed in most jurisdictions in the US.
While true, it misses the point, which is: Christian churches never denied people access to Jesus Christ and salvation on the basis of their skin color, while Masonry did deny the 'benefits' of membership on exactly that basis. Despite Masonry's motto "The Brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of God," their active racism gave lie to the motto itself by showing how hollow it really was. Of note, the racism therein continued well into the 20th Century, with South Carolina, for example, limiting membership to white men only through 1975, if not later.
Point 5 - Yet another significant comment from Circuitrider:
I know a number of Masons who are practicing Roman Catholics.
Just what kind of Catholic ignores the teaching of his church to participate in an organization that has been found to reject Catholic doctrine? It's very much typical of Masons, who really put Freemasonry above the churches they attend. Cordially, Skip.