JohnAshton
Well-Known Member
- Aug 13, 2019
- 2,197
- 1,580
- 88
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
Based on all the evidence and other pertinent material, tulc is to be believed, of course.
Upvote
0
I'm sorry I wasn't clearer in what I was asking, I was looking for support for the "They tore the houses up faster then we could make them." part of his post. I explained that to him when it was obvious he had also misunderstood what I was asking. My apologies for the confusion.You inappropriately asked joshua 1 9 for proof of what he claimed as his own personal experience, which closely mirrors my own personal experience from 13 years of actually living in inner city Cleveland, Ohio and running a rescue mission there. But you did not offer the slightest evidence to back up your unrealistic claim about your alleged experience.
So, by telling the leaders that if the don't stop investigations into his son and his sons company... that he will withhold millions of dollars of money.... was not bribery? Not quid pro quo.... not blackmail?Biden simply accomplished the task that he was assigned. That's what he was bragging about.
Or ... do you think that a US Vice-President has the unilateral power to deny assistance to foreign nations ? The role of the US Vice President is to support the administration of the president. Could Biden have done otherwise ?
No ... he didn't say what you say here.So, by telling the leaders that if the don't stop investigations into his son and his sons company... that he will withhold millions of dollars of money.... was not bribery? Not quid pro quo.... not blackmail?
Seriously?
- And it was pure coincidence that this “corrupt” investigator was looking into alleged corruption of the Biden enterprise, but it was clear corruption for Trump to ask for an investigation of THAT? Yeah, we understand.No ... he didn't say what you say here.
He told the Ukrainian government that they couldn't get the assistance they were requesting ... before first firing their corrupt prosecutor.
This requirement was official US policy, and in concert with the rest of the US European community partners, who were making the same or similar demands of their own.
Biden enterprise??? Where have you been? Biden sat on the board.- And it was pure coincidence that this “corrupt” investigator was looking into alleged corruption of the Biden enterprise, but it was clear corruption for Trump to ask for an investigation of THAT? Yeah, we understand.
No witch hunt. Just like the Russian investigation, it began because of Trump's stupidity.THIS is how we KNOW this whole “investigation” is nothing but a WITCH HUNT.
That prosecutor, Shokin, was not looking into anything regarding the Bidens at that time. He was supporting corrupt activity in Ukraine.- And it was pure coincidence that this “corrupt” investigator was looking into alleged corruption of the Biden enterprise,
- And it was pure coincidence that this “corrupt” investigator was looking into alleged corruption of the Biden enterprise, ...
That statement is a falsehood, a libel.So, by telling the leaders that if the don't stop investigations into his son and his sons company... that he will withhold millions of dollars of money.... was not bribery? Not quid pro quo.... not blackmail? Seriously?
...that all being said: I want to thank you, Biblewriter and Joshua 1 9 for your years of serving the poor and those in need. It can indeed be a heart/back breaking, (as well as faith building) task that never seems to end. so blessings on both of you!(snip) My apologies for the confusion.
Unfortunately for your side, Joe Biden openly boasted, on TV, about having done this. We have seen the recording. And we KNOW it is COMPLETELY true.That statement is a falsehood, a libel.
You have doubled down on libel about false criminality. Your own words convict you.Unfortunately for your side, Joe Biden openly boasted, on TV, about having done this. We have seen the recording. And we KNOW it is COMPLETELY true.
To qualify as libel, it has to be false. But Biden not only admitted he did this. He openly boasted about having done it. If you are ignorant of the video of his boasting, that is your fault. For it has been widely publicized.JohnAshton said: That statement is a falsehood, a libel.
You have doubled down on libel about false criminality. Your own words convict you.
That is incorrect. Biden boasted about helping get a corrupt prosecutor removed. He said nothing about the company his son worked for. This guy was holding up a British investigation into the company for money laundering and Burisma was eventually fined.Unfortunately for your side, Joe Biden openly boasted, on TV, about having done this. We have seen the recording. And we KNOW it is COMPLETELY true.
- Who only "happened" to have been investigating Burisma, which company only "happened" to be paying Biden's son millions of dollars to do a job for which he had ZERO QUALIFICATIONS. Yeah, sure.That is incorrect. Biden boasted about helping get a corrupt prosecutor removed. He said nothing about the company his son worked for. This guy was holding up a British investigation into the company for money laundering and Burisma was eventually fined.
The money the US was withholding was small compared to the money international organizations were withholding.
Your comment is libel, too, because it is false that Biden did anything wrong. He did nothing criminal, where as Trump as violated the Constitution and the law.To qualify as libel, it has to be false. But Biden not only admitted he did this. He openly boasted about having done it. If you are ignorant of the video of his boasting, that is your fault. For it has been widely publicized.
Yes, that is the Trump supporter argument, although the particulars are false. The Bidens did nothing criminal, but Trump crossed the Constitution in asking another country to investigate his opponent. Thank you for condemning Trump, Biblewriter.- Who only "happened" to have been investigating Burisma, which company only "happened" to be paying Biden's son millions of dollars to do a job for which he had ZERO QUALIFICATIONS. Yeah, sure.
It borders on insanity to even try to pretend that this does not at least appear to have been corrupt, or to even pretend that the fact that Joe Biden decided to run for office exempted him from investigation of what UNQUESTIONABLY appears to have been a CRIMINAL quid pro quo, done with well over a BILLION United States tax dollars.
This has all been investigated ... and the Bidens found innocent of any wrong-doing.- Who only "happened" to have been investigating Burisma, which company only "happened" to be paying Biden's son millions of dollars to do a job for which he had ZERO QUALIFICATIONS. Yeah, sure.
It borders on insanity to even try to pretend that this does not at least appear to have been corrupt, or to even pretend that the fact that Joe Biden decided to run for office exempted him from investigation of what UNQUESTIONABLY appears to have been a CRIMINAL quid pro quo, done with well over a BILLION United States tax dollars.
The guy wasn't investigating Burisma anymore when Biden and several other European factions stepped in to help get the prosecutor fired. This guy was holding up the British investigation into money laundering by Burisma's owner and to which they were fined millions of dollars for after a new prosecutor was appointed.- Who only "happened" to have been investigating Burisma, which company only "happened" to be paying Biden's son millions of dollars to do a job for which he had ZERO QUALIFICATIONS. Yeah, sure.
I agree that Burisma's appointment of Hunter Biden was a corrupt act by Burisma's owner but there was no Ukrainian laws broken by Hunter Biden, according to the prosecutor. He couldn't say if any US tax laws may have been violated but would work with US officials if needed.It borders on insanity to even try to pretend that this does not at least appear to have been corrupt,
How would an election by Biden exempt him from an investigation. You seem to be acknowledging that that is what Trump is doing now.or to even pretend that the fact that Joe Biden decided to run for office exempted him from investigation of what UNQUESTIONABLY appears to have been a CRIMINAL quid pro quo, done with well over a BILLION United States tax dollars.