Did Nancy use the "B" word?

[Archivist]

And I'm a pro-life Democrat.

I finally realized that this issue won't be solved politically.

And Trump is just more than I can take ...

Agreed regarding Mr. Trump. He did not get my vote in the last election, nor will he get it in the next election.

 

[Archivist]

1 John 3:9
9 Whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him; and he cannot sin, because he has been born of God.

Romans 3:23: “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;”

Are you saying you do???

Yes. Thankfully my sins are forgiven.

 

[Archivist]

Why are you pro choice?

Because I believe that it is not up to me to force a pregnant woman to carry a fetus to term. Her body, her choice.

 

[JacksBratt]

Because I believe that it is not up to me to force a pregnant woman to carry a fetus to term. Her body, her choice.

So... what about "Thou shalt not kill"?

What about the child's choice?

How do you justify killing someone else just because they make your life more difficult or their existence is "inconvenient"?

When, exactly, is it "not OK" to kill a person? 1 week after conception, 2, 3, two months, 4 months, 8 months and 29 days, 1 day old, 1 week old, 1 year, 2 years, 5, 10, 25 years?????

 

[JohnAshton]

Archivist said: Because I believe that it is not up to me to force a pregnant woman to carry a fetus to term. Her body, her choice.

So... what about "Thou shalt not kill"?

What about the child's choice?

How do you justify killing someone else just because they make your life more difficult or their existence is "inconvenient"?

When, exactly, is it "not OK" to kill a person? 1 week after conception, 2, 3, two months, 4 months, 8 months and 29 days, 1 day old, 1 week old, 1 year, 2 years, 5, 10, 25 years?????

Because it is not your choice, not your business.

 

[JacksBratt]

Archivist said: Because I believe that it is not up to me to force a pregnant woman to carry a fetus to term. Her body, her choice.

Because it is not your choice, not your business.

What if I go and kill my neighbor? Is that not anyone's business either?

 

[JohnAshton]

JohnAshton said: Archivist said: Because I believe that it is not up to me to force a pregnant woman to carry a fetus to term. Her body, her choice.

Because it is not your choice, not your business.

What if I go and kill my neighbor? Is that not anyone's business either?

Jack, you are not a judge or a jury. If you kill your neighbor, I guarantee the law man will come for you, as they should. If you kill a woman who has an abortion, I guarantee the law man will come for you, while if she kills you in self defense, no one will come for here.

It's not your choice, not your business.

 

[JacksBratt]

JohnAshton said: Archivist said: Because I believe that it is not up to me to force a pregnant woman to carry a fetus to term. Her body, her choice.

Because it is not your choice, not your business.

Jack, you are not a judge or a jury. If you kill your neighbor, I guarantee the law man will come for you, as they should. If you kill a woman who has an abortion, I guarantee the law man will come for you, while if she kills you in self defense, no one will come for here.

It's not your choice, not your business.

So, what am I missing here? A child can be killed but an adult cannot?

 

[JohnAshton]

So, what am I missing here? A child can be killed but an adult cannot?

A fetus is not a child. You are not the judge of definitions, either, including legal, scientific, and religious.

 

[Archivist]

So... what about "Thou shalt not kill"?

What about the child's choice?

How do you justify killing someone else just because they make your life more difficult or their existence is "inconvenient"?

I'm not killing anyone. Please do not make false accusations.

When, exactly, is it "not OK" to kill a person? 1 week after conception, 2, 3, two months, 4 months, 8 months and 29 days, 1 day old, 1 week old, 1 year, 2 years, 5, 10, 25 years?????

In the US citizenship begins at birth. That is in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. You cannot, therefore, kill someone who is one day old, one week old, one year, or 5, 10, or 25 years old.

 

[JohnAshton]

Archivist did not say you were killing anyone: do not make false accusations, Jack.

Please be accurate from now on.

 

[JacksBratt]

A fetus is not a child. You are not the judge of definitions, either, including legal, scientific, and religious.

When does a fetus become a human being?

 

[JacksBratt]

I'm not killing anyone. Please do not make false accusations.

I never said you were... I as speaking figuratively.. I'm sure that you have seen that before..

To clarify.... What I should have said, to avoid confusion:

How would you justify the of killing someone else just because they make that persons life more difficult or their existence is "inconvenient"?

In the US citizenship begins at birth. That is in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. You cannot, therefore, kill someone who is one day old, one week old, one year, or 5, 10, or 25 years old.

I think that you are confusing a "citizen" with a "human being".

I am not a citizen of the US... Does that mean that I can be killed, before I become a citizen of the US... if I venture down there?

When does a fetus become a human being?

 

[Biblewriter]

The “information” that Biden was cleared of any wrongdoing, like most of the other “information” you have posted here, is an obviously false statement that comes from an obviously biased “news” source that has been repeatedly caught publishing outright lies.

 

[Biblewriter]

Yes, that is the Trump supporter argument, although the particulars are false. The Bidens did nothing criminal, but Trump crossed the Constitution in asking another country to investigate his opponent. Thank you for condemning Trump, Biblewriter.

This is factually incorrect. The only distinct provision of the Constitution that even applies to this action is the clause that the President is to ensure that the laws are faithful executed.

There can be absolutely ZERO question that what Joe Biden openly boasted about having done at least LOOKED like a criminal act.

Such an action that UNQUESTIONABLY looked criminal most certainly deserved investigation. Failure to do this would have been a failure of the President to do what the Constitution explicitly says he MUST do.

And the fact that the BOASTED perpetrator of this APPARENTLY criminal act had decided to run for office did not change what the Constitution explicitly say the President MUST do.

 

[A_Thinker]

This is factually incorrect. The only distinct provision of the Constitution that even applies to this action is the clause that the President is to ensure that the laws are faithful executed.

There can be absolutely ZERO question that what Joe Biden openly boasted about having done at least LOOKED like a criminal act.

Such an action that UNQUESTIONABLY looked criminal most certainly deserved investigation. Failure to do this would have been a failure of the President to do what the Constitution explicitly says he MUST do.

And the fact that the BOASTED perpetrator of this APPARENTLY criminal act had decided to run for office did not change what the Constitution explicitly say the President MUST do.

Wow ... perhaps you should be President ... or Chief Justice ...

 

[tulc]

The “information” that Biden was cleared of any wrongdoing, like most of the other “information” you have posted here, is an obviously false statement that comes from an obviously biased “news” source that has been repeatedly caught publishing outright lies.

Fine, post a link, something that shows vice President Biden was investigated by an actual government investigation that has concluded he's guilty. That would be something I think all of us would be interested in seeing. If you can't find anything perhaps it's because your belief in his guilt (like President Trumps same belief) isn't based on any actual facts, it's based solely on your wanting him to be guilty of something?
tulc(just a thought)

 

[JohnAshton]

The “information” that Biden was cleared of any wrongdoing, like most of the other “information” you have posted here, is an obviously false statement that comes from an obviously biased “news” source that has been repeatedly caught publishing outright lies.

Your comments are false that Biden was not cleared, because there was no need for an investigation.

 

[Biblewriter]

Archivist said: Because I believe that it is not up to me to force a pregnant woman to carry a fetus to term. Her body, her choice.

Because it is not your choice, not your business.

That is simply untrue. God very explicitly said that a murderer MUST be executed. No exceptions are allowed.

 

[Biblewriter]

So - after clearly stating that the prosecutor cleared Biden, you now claim that he was never investigated?

Why can you fail to see what a contradiction this is?