Did Nancy use the "B" word?

[JohnAshton]

. . . the which of hearsay is allowed to build a solid circumstantial case for the prosecution. It's only 'blah blah blah' to those who can't hear clearly.

Let Pompeo testify under oath is the answer to your questions, JacksBratt.

 

[JacksBratt]

. . . the which of hearsay is allowed to build a solid circumstantial case for the prosecution. It's only 'blah blah blah' to those who can't hear clearly.

Let Pompeo testify under oath is the answer to your questions, JacksBratt.

Nothing in the hearings has ever been concrete. It is all " I heard that he said that he said that he said..."... There is nothing but presumptions and hearsay.

It's just embarrassing... It matters not who testifies.... Trump put out the transcript... it is solid truth and nobody has been able to show "quid pro quo", or bribery.. They were not counting on Trump revealing.... It basically sunk them but they could not quit as it would have made them look totally pathetic..... Now they hide in hours of wasted tax payer money.

2 presumptions + 2 presumptions = 0

 

[JohnAshton]

QPQ has been demonstrated unequivocally.

No doubt about it.

 

[JacksBratt]

QPQ has been demonstrated unequivocally.

No doubt about it.

Only the Dems have eyes to see it...At the same time, they're blind to Biden and his son's corruption... What glasses are they wearing?

 

[Biblewriter]

You don't comprehend exactly what legally his 'hearsay' in these hearings, and instead of worrying about the fire, you want to know who called to report it.

NO, it is worrying about whether or not there actually IS a fire. So when it has been demonstrated that ALL the calls (reported so far) were based on a single man shouting "fire," and that man admits he did not actually see a fire, we know it was a false alarm.

 

[JohnAshton]

Yes, there is a raging fire called Trump who is trying overthrow the Constitution, eviscerate the Separation of Powers, and dismantle its Checks and Balance. Putin is thrilled at all of this. The false alarm is that of the GOP saying "there is no raging fire."

 

[Archivist]

Nothing in the hearings has ever been concrete. It is all " I heard that he said that he said that he said..."... There is nothing but presumptions and hearsay.

It's just embarrassing... It matters not who testifies.... Trump put out the transcript... it is solid truth and nobody has been able to show "quid pro quo", or bribery.. They were not counting on Trump revealing.... It basically sunk them but they could not quit as it would have made them look totally pathetic..... Now they hide in hours of wasted tax payer money.

2 presumptions + 2 presumptions = 0

Except hearsay is a legal concept and does not apply to impeachment hearings.

 

[Biblewriter]

Yes, there is a raging fire called Trump who is trying overthrow the Constitution, eviscerate the Separation of Powers, and dismantle its Checks and Balance. Putin is thrilled at all of this. The false alarm is that of the GOP saying "there is no raging fire."

ALL of this is EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of the truth, except that Putin is indeed thrilled at how successful his program was in sowing dissent in the United States, through his useful idiots, the Democrat party.

 

[JohnAshton]

ALL of this is EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of the truth, except that Putin is indeed thrilled at how successful his program was in sowing dissent in the United States, through his useful idiots, the Democrat party.

All of it is true, and Putin is delighted how he has manipulated Trump and his followers.