• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Did all the laws end at the cross- Part 2

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,289
2,554
55
Northeast
✟237,229.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You don't think spending time with God in worship is part of keeping the Sabbath day holy?
Well, it sounds good :)
Myself, I try to spend all time with God.

Do the scriptures teach that Leviticus 23:3 ended at the cross?
 
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Well, it sounds good :)
Myself, I try to spend all time with God.

Do the scriptures teach that Leviticus 23:3 ended at the cross?
No.

I spend every day with god as that is the only way to have a strong relationship with Him. However Sabbath is a special day set aside for communication with Him and having nothing to do with every day activities,
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,289
2,554
55
Northeast
✟237,229.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No.

I spend every day with god as that is the only way to have a strong relationship with Him. However Sabbath is a special day set aside for communication with Him and having nothing to do with every day activities,
Are you saying No, the scriptures do not teach that Leviticus 23:3 ended at the cross?

I'm asking because one of the big issues in the Sabbath and the law section is which laws ended at the cross and which continue.
 
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Are you saying No, the scriptures do not teach that Leviticus 23:3 ended at the cross?

I'm asking because one of the big issues in the Sabbath and the law section is which laws ended at the cross and which continue.
Yes, Once again I consider this a silly question to ask a Sabbath keeper.
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,289
2,554
55
Northeast
✟237,229.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes, Once again I consider this a silly question to ask a Sabbath keeper.
I'm asking because I thought you had said earlier that out of the Old testament, only the 10 commandments were still commandments for today.

Did I misunderstand you earlier?
 
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I'm asking because I thought you had said earlier that out of the Old testament, only the 10 commandments were still commandments for today.

Did I misunderstand you earlier?
No. Leviticus 23: 3 is a paraphrase of the 4th commandment.

Lev 23:3 Six days shall work be done: but the seventh day is the sabbath of rest, an holy convocation; ye shall do no work therein: it is the sabbath of the LORD in all your dwellings.
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,289
2,554
55
Northeast
✟237,229.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No. Leviticus 23: 3 is a paraphrase of the 4th commandment.
It doesn't look like a paraphrase to me, the fourth commandment doesn't talk about a holy assembly, dies it?

Anyways, am I understanding right in your view, the ten commandments are the only ones that carry over into the New Covenant?
 
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
It doesn't look like a paraphrase to me, the fourth commandment doesn't talk about a holy assembly, dies it?

Anyways, am I understanding right in your view, the ten commandments are the only ones that carry over into the New Covenant?
So, in your mind keeping the Sabbath day holy has nothing to do with worshiping God? Why do you go to church?
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,289
2,554
55
Northeast
✟237,229.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,289
2,554
55
Northeast
✟237,229.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So you would consider those things somehow out of line on Sabbath?
No, not at all :)

That God never intended these to be done on Sabbath?
I think God intended physical Israel to do them on the Sabbath.

I think he intends for us to do them all the time under the New Covenant.

Israel had God inside the holy of holies, we have the Holy Spirit spirit inside of us.

 
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
No, not at all :)


I think God intended physical Israel to do them on the Sabbath.

I think he intends for us to do them all the time under the New Covenant.

Israel had God inside the holy of holies, we have the Holy Spirit spirit inside of us.

Well,as you already know I can only partially agree with you,

Eph 2:18 For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father.
Eph 2:19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
Eph 2:20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;
Eph 2:21 In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:
Eph 2:22 In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.

Doesn't look to me that Paul thinks we Gentiles are to believe/behave any different than Jews who become Christians as we are all the same building.

Act_10:34 Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:

Peter's statement cuts both ways. God sees all of humanity the same way and makes no difference between us.
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,289
2,554
55
Northeast
✟237,229.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well,as you already know I can only partially agree with you,



Doesn't look to me that Paul thinks we Gentiles are to believe/behave any different than Jews who become Christians as we are all the same building.
That's correct. We behave differently than physical Israelites who were under the old covenant.

And we agree that Jews and gentiles who become Christians are all in the same building and body

Peter's statement cuts both ways. God sees all of humanity the same way and makes no difference between us.
Absolutely!

And we also know that under the New Covenant, God's laws are written on our heart. In the old covenant, they were written on stone or maybe animal hide.
 
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
That's correct. We behave differently than physical Israelites who were under the old covenant.

And we agree that Jews and gentiles who become Christians are all in the same building and body


Absolutely!

And we also know that under the New Covenant, God's laws are written on our heart. In the old covenant, they were written on stone or maybe animal hide.
Sorry but that is an erroneous reading. Paul was a commandment keeper and so were the Jews at the head of the Christian church in Jerusalem which sent the following message to the Gentiles.

Act 15:23 And they wrote letters by them after this manner; The apostles and elders and brethren send greeting unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia:
Act 15:24 Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment:
Act 15:25 It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul,
Act 15:26 Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Act 15:27 We have sent therefore Judas and Silas, who shall also tell you the same things by mouth.
Act 15:28 For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;
Act 15:29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.

Now if you claim the law mentioned is the 10 which includes the 4th and the Gentiles were to ignore it, then why do you think the other 9 are still binding on you? And why do you claim God sees us differently than He saw the leaders of the early Christian church which were all commandment keeping Jews? Also. do you abstain from eating blood?
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,289
2,554
55
Northeast
✟237,229.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sorry but that is an erroneous reading.
Which reading are you referring to?

Paul was a commandment keeper...
Definitely! Paul lived as a Jew in order to win the Jews.

And there's also this passage

...and so were the Jews at the head of the Christian church in Jerusalem which sent the following message to the Gentiles.
Old habits die hard. Do you try to celebrate Pentecost in Jerusalem?

Now if you claim the law mentioned is the 10 which includes the 4th and the Gentiles were to ignore it, then why do you think the other 9 are still binding on you?
I don't.

A common response at this point is to say that I must think it's okay to murder and steal. No, there are other reasons not to do that.

It is against the law in North Korea to insult the General.

I don't insult him.

It does not logically follow that I am under the rules of North Korea.

And why do you claim God sees us differently than He saw the leaders of the early Christian church which were all commandment keeping Jews?
I don't think God sees us differently. I think many Jewish people back then were keeping the law out of habit.

Even today, some Jewish people I know who accept Jesus as the Messiah continue to go to their synagogue on Friday evening. Nothing wrong with that :)

Under the New Covenant, we may continue to keep the instructions given to the Israelites in the wilderness. But we don't have to.

Also. do you abstain from eating blood?
No. I do cook the meat that I eat, so I don't know if that's still qualifies as blood or not :)

A strict reading of Acts 15 would mean no blood transfusions, as well imo.
 
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Which reading are you referring to?


Definitely! Paul lived as a Jew in order to win the Jews.

And there's also this passage


Old habits die hard. Do you try to celebrate Pentecost in Jerusalem?


I don't.

A common response at this point is to say that I must think it's okay to murder and steal. No, there are other reasons not to do that.

It is against the law in North Korea to insult the General.

I don't insult him.

It does not logically follow that I am under the rules of North Korea.


I don't think God sees us differently. I think many Jewish people back then were keeping the law out of habit.

Even today, some Jewish people I know who accept Jesus as the Messiah continue to go to their synagogue on Friday evening. Nothing wrong with that :)

Under the New Covenant, we may continue to keep the instructions given to the Israelites in the wilderness. But we don't have to.


No. I do cook the meat that I eat, so I don't know if that's still qualifies as blood or not :)

A strict reading of Acts 15 would mean no blood transfusions, as well imo.
So, old habits die hard? That's your best explanation for Paul behaving exactly the opposite of what you think he taught? That's called hypocrisy and is a serious sin as it is a form of lying. And you want to follow a hypocrite? I stay as far as possible as I can away from imitating a hypocrite.
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,289
2,554
55
Northeast
✟237,229.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So, old habits die hard? That's your best explanation for Paul behaving exactly the opposite of what you think he taught? That's called hypocrisy and is a serious sin as it is a form of lying. And you want to follow a hypocrite? I stay as far as possible as I can away from imitating a hypocrite.
He didn't behave the opposite, it's okay for a person to follow the law if they wish.

The only reason for the leaders in Jerusalem to say this is if it isn't true in the gentile Christian world. The behaviors were different, the Covenant was the same.

Again, do you follow Paul's practice here
 
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
He didn't behave the opposite, it's okay for a person to follow the law if they wish.

The only reason for the leaders in Jerusalem to say this is if it isn't true in the gentile Christian world. The behaviors were different, the Covenant was the same.

Again, do you follow Paul's practice here
Sorry, but that just makes me laugh. Your words implied Paul taught exactly the opposite of how he lived. That is hypocrisy, pure and simple. There is no other explanation for it.

I should hurry to Jerusalem during my world travels? Paul didn't teach the Gentiles to do that and neither was that taught by the leaders of the Christian church at Jerusalem. If you remember correctly this was addressed by the letters sent out to the Gentile churches Paul and Barnabas were planting. So you're asking me to be a hypocrite?

Oh, and cooking meat does not make it kosher. It takes very specific actions to remove all the blood from meat, and from what I'm told it is very tasteless afterwards. So you don't even follow the instructions to the Gentiles. I don't have to worry about that anymore as I'm a vegetarian and have been most of my life. You most likely eat pork too. Even during the days of my rebellion against God I wouldn't do that.
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,289
2,554
55
Northeast
✟237,229.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sorry, but that just makes me laugh. Your words implied Paul taught exactly the opposite of how he lived.
Then you misunderstand my words :)

That is hypocrisy, pure and simple. There is no other explanation for it.


I should hurry to Jerusalem during my world travels?
No, you shouldn't, that's what I was getting at :)

Paul didn't teach the Gentiles to do that and neither was that taught by the leaders of the Christian church at Jerusalem.
Exactly! So we see Paul taking actions that were not required of other believers.

Paul lived as a Jew when he was around other Jews. We may choose to do that, as well. It's not required.

If you remember correctly this was addressed by the letters sent out to the Gentile churches Paul and Barnabas were planting. So you're asking me to be a hypocrite?
No, I'm not asking you to be a hypocrite. It wasn't hypocritical for Paul to hurry to get to Jerusalem by Pentecost. It was something he could do, he wasn't required.

Oh, and cooking meat does not make it kosher.
Your question was about eating blood. If it's cooked, is it still blood? I don't think so, but it's not something what I worry about :)

It takes very specific actions to remove all the blood from meat, and from what I'm told it is very tasteless afterwards. So you don't even follow the instructions to the Gentiles.
That's correct. They were given at a specific time for specific reasons, i.e. new churches with hardcore observant Jews and recently idol worshiping Greeks in the same meeting.

I don't have to worry about that anymore as I'm a vegetarian and have been most of my life.
Great :thumbsup:

You most likely eat pork too.
Sometimes, not very often. The key, I think, is that we don't have to ask.

Even during the days of my rebellion against God I wouldn't do that.
It isn't rebellion against God, it's in accordance with the scriptures in their entirety.

We have a different understanding of the scriptures. That's great! Then we have a good basis for discussion :)
 
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Then you misunderstand my words :)





No, you shouldn't, that's what I was getting at :)


Exactly! So we see Paul taking actions that were not required of other believers.

Paul lived as a Jew when he was around other Jews. We may choose to do that, as well. It's not required.


No, I'm not asking you to be a hypocrite. It wasn't hypocritical for Paul to hurry to get to Jerusalem by Pentecost. It was something he could do, he wasn't required.


Your question was about eating blood. If it's cooked, is it still blood? I don't think so, but it's not something what I worry about :)


That's correct. They were given at a specific time for specific reasons, i.e. new churches with hardcore observant Jews and recently idol worshiping Greeks in the same meeting.


Great :thumbsup:


Sometimes, not very often. The key, I think, is that we don't have to ask.


It isn't rebellion against God, it's in accordance with the scriptures in their entirety.

We have a different understanding of the scriptures. That's great! Then we have a good basis for discussion :)
First, if keeping the law is legalism to you how is it no big deal to keep the law as legalism is attempting to obey God throughour own power. And why have you been telling me this for the entire time we have been discussing scripture? It makes no sense to me.

Second, why do you take 1 Corinthians 10: 27 so far out of context? The entire context is about eating food offered to idols.

1Co 10:27 If any of them that believe not bid you to a feast, and ye be disposed to go; whatsoever is set before you, eat, asking no question for conscience sake.
1Co 10:28 But if any man say unto you, This is offered in sacrifice unto idols, eat not for his sake that shewed it, and for conscience sake: for the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof:

Paul goes on to the end of the chapter speaking of foods offered to idols
 
Upvote 0