• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Conception of Hell

What is your conception of Hell?

  • Traditional (fire & brimstone)

  • Miltonian

  • Other

  • Undecided/Don't believe in Hell


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Simon_Templar

Not all who wander are lost
Jun 29, 2004
7,865
1,130
51
Visit site
✟51,667.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Well I apologize if you found my post abrasive and unreasonable. The 2 major points you posted, which I replied to are used virtually on a daily basis around here to "prove", so they think, that hell does not exist. 1. The argument, Gehenna was only a garbage dump and that is what it meant to the Jews of Jesus day, it never meant "hell" that is a mistranslation." That entire argument is invalid because there is no Biblical, historical, archaeological, etc evidence that the valley of Ben Hinnom was ever used as a garbage dump.

2. The second part of your argument is invalid because historical evidence shows that long before the NT, the Jews used the words "Sheol" and "Gehenna" interchangeably to refer to the place of eternal, unending punishment of the wicked. I have another citation from the Talmud showing that is what the two major religious schools in Israel at the time of Jesus, Hillel and Shammai, taught.



I perceived your post to be the same kind of arguments that I referred to above, and which have been refuted time and time again here in this forum. But no matter how many times real, historical evidence is posted, there will invariably be someone who comes in and posts those same arguments over and over and over.


People do use the garbage dump idea to argue that hell is not literal, not eternal etc... but thats just bad reasoning.

The idea that Gehenna was a garbage dump that was perpetually burning could conceivably support the annihilationist view, however, it can just as easily support the traditional view.

In order for it to be 'evidence' either way it needs to conclusively support one and not the other. Since it really doesn't support the annhilationist view any more strongly or logically, it is at best an interesting bit of trivia and a possible source for the term "lake of fire".

If it isn't true, then it is one of hundreds supposed facts that get tossed around all the time without real historical basis. I'm willing to bet that if you annalysed the anecdotal style 'historical facts' used by sermons across the country a high percentage of them would prove to be without real basis or support.

I thought I made it clear in my post that the Jewish association of the Valley of Hinnom with the idea of the underworld/hell was seperate from, and predated the supposed garbage dump association. Perhaps I didn't make it clear or explicit enough in my post.

As to the 2nd part of my argument, which is invalid... I'm really not sure what your even referring to.

As I never addressed the word sheol at all or made any correlation between it an gehenna (positive or negative).

I must assume you are referring to my assertion that there are two places, possibly three which are referred to that we lump together under the term hell (hades).

In Jewish conception (and the bible) it is very clear that sheol was regarded as the place where all of the dead went to wait. Both the righteous and the unrighteous went to Sheol.

Sheol the word means grave and it usually translated as the grave. However, this is a metaphorical reference as the way sheol is described clearly shows it not to be a mere grave, but rather the residing place of the souls of the dead.
In the Jewish conception this place was divided between a part in which the wicked were kept, and a part in which the righteous were kept. The part where the righteous were kept was euphamisticly and metaphorically referred to as abraham's bosom in the sense that people who where there were said have gone to Abraham's bosom.

Further in ancient Jewish conception there were seven heavens, the 3rd out of the seven was divided between a garden paradise, and another area which was tormented by extremes of both hot and cold. I can't catagorically say that this is sheol/hades, but I do believe that it is referring to the same thing, the same place.

Further, I believe this is what Jesus was referring to when he said "this day you will be with me in paradise" and it is also clearly what Paul was talking about when he said he knew a man (probably himself) who was caught up to 3rd heaven, which he then refers to as 'Paradise'.

I have no doubt that Hades/Sheol/Gehenna are all interchangable terms in the ancient Jewish conception. I also don't see how that invalidates anything I have said above. Perhaps I didn't communicate this clearly in my original post.

The idea of the third place, as far as I know, is somewhat unique to me. It may exist in the ancient Jewish views, I don't know. I've never really heard anyone else teach it however.
The idea comes simply from the observation in scripture that there is no cleare evidence of fallen angels that are imprisoned, being imprisoned in the same place where human souls go to await judgement.

It could be, and if it is I certainly won't lose any sleep over it, that this 'third place' is simply part of hades/sheol/gehenna. In fact it may be more likely that it is yet another division within hades, rather than an entirely seperate place.
 
Upvote 0

Simon_Templar

Not all who wander are lost
Jun 29, 2004
7,865
1,130
51
Visit site
✟51,667.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Hey Simon, I don't want to kick you while you are down, but (I guess I will anyway ;)),

Actually the words that are rendered "Lake of Fire" are not ge'enna, but ἡ λίμνη τοῦ πυρός, which is translated "the lake the fire,"
Limnology (from limne and logos) is the study of lakes, and the word pyro (pyromaniac) is from puros.

Tim

no problem :) I apparently had my references crossed
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,128
6,153
EST
✟1,151,696.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Sheol is not the grave. Sheol is the realm of the dead.

Qeber is the grave.

In Isaiah 14 there is a long passage about the king of Babylon dying, and according to many the dead know nothing. They are supposedly annihilated, destroyed, gone! God, Himself, speaking, these dead people in שאול/sheol, know something, they move, meet the dead coming to sheol, stir up, raise up, speak and say, etc.
Isa 14:9-11 (KJV)
9)
Hell [שאול] from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming: it stirreth up the dead for thee, even all the chief ones of the earth; it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations.
10) All they shall speak and say unto thee, Art thou also become weak as we? art thou become like unto us?
11) Thy pomp is brought down to the grave, and the noise of thy viols: the worm is spread under thee, and the worms cover thee.
[ . . . ]
22) For I will rise up against them, saith the LORD of hosts, and cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant, and son, and nephew, saith the LORD.
In this passage God, himself is speaking, and I see a whole lot of shaking going on, moving, rising up, and speaking in . These dead people seem to know something, about something. We know that verses 11 through 14 describe actual historical events, the death of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babble-on.

Here is another passage where God himself is speaking and people who are dead in sheol, speaking, being ashamed, comforted, etc.
Ezek 32:18-22, 30-31 (KJV)
18)
Son of man, [Ezekiel] wail for the multitude of Egypt, and cast them down, even her, and the daughters of the famous nations, unto the nether parts of the earth, with them that go down into the pit. [בּור/Bor]
19) Whom dost thou pass in beauty? go down, and be thou laid with the uncircumcised.
20) They shall fall in the midst of them that are slain by the sword: she is delivered to the sword: draw her and all her multitudes.
21) The strong among the mighty shall speak to him out of the midst of hell [שאול] with them that help him: they are gone down, they lie uncircumcised, slain by the sword.
22) Asshur is there and all her company: his graves [קברה/qebrah] are about him: all of them slain, fallen by the sword::[ . . . ]
Eze 32:30-31
(30)
There be the princes of the north, all of them, and all the Zidonians, which are gone down with the slain; with their terror they are ashamed of their might; and they lie uncircumcised with them that be slain by the sword, and bear their shame with them that go down to the pit.
(31) Pharaoh shall see them, and shall be comforted over all his multitude, even Pharaoh and all his army slain by the sword, saith the Lord GOD.
 
Upvote 0

Simon_Templar

Not all who wander are lost
Jun 29, 2004
7,865
1,130
51
Visit site
✟51,667.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Sheol is not the grave. Sheol is the realm of the dead.

Qeber is the grave.

I don't disagree that sheol is the realm of the dead. however, sheol is translated as The grave numerous times in the OT. Qeber is generally rendered as "a grave" where as sheol is "THE grave". IE qeber is a generic grave, sheol is THE place where all the dead go.
 
Upvote 0

MaidforHim

Senior Veteran
Aug 24, 2006
2,545
634
✟36,263.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What is "hell" to you? For me, it's not the traditional "fire and brimstone" place, but a place full of darkness, decay, and moaning, a complete and total absence from God. Satan rules this darkness. I compare it to John Milton's conception.

I believe it is all those things, exactly what is described in the Bible as well as the things you stated many of which are also referred to in the Bible. I don't think it would be possible to really explain the entire reality of hell in just a few words. In fact I think if God were to give us an complete and thorough description we would most likely not be able to wrap our minds around it.

A place of eternal torment and suffering pretty much gives us all the info we need to understand that we don't want to end up there. :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
But the heavens that now are, and the earth, by the same word have been stored up for fire, being reserved against the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.

2 Peter 3:7 indicates that the ungodly men will be destroyed on the day of judgement, however it is not God's desire for ungodly men to perish, but to repent and come to Him.

Tim
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Dave
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,549
28,532
75
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,330.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Miltonian

Is that speaking of the theology of John Milton :confused:

John Milton - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

*snip*

Milton embraced many heterodox Christian theological views. He rejected the Trinity, in the belief that the Son was subordinate to the Father, a position known as Arianism; and his sympathy or curiosity was probably engaged by Socinianism: in August 1650 he licensed for publication by William Dugard the Racovian Catechism, based on a non-trinitarian creed.[48][49] A source has interpreted him as broadly Protestant, if not always easy to locate in a more precise religious category.
 
Upvote 0

BondiHarry

Newbie
Mar 29, 2011
1,715
94
✟24,913.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
I marvel that so many people are not satisfied with what God does say about His punishment for those who die in their sins that they insist eternal cognizant torment must be added. The Bible at best has only a few verses that vaguely suggest this fate but when all the verses which clearly speak of death or destruction are considered is it really plausible?

What God does tell us of the lost is: They will bend their knee and confess that Jesus is Lord, they will give an account for every idle word they have spoken and evil deed they have done, God will pour His wrath out upon them and then they and hell will be cast into the lake of fire which is the second death.

The Bible is the inerrant word of God but not everything that we are told is to be taken literally. The parables are a good example. Does anyone really believe that a servant could owe a debt of 10,000 talents (a talent being the equivalent of perhaps 15 times what the typical servant would earn in a year)? It is meant to show a debt that could not be paid back just as we can never pay the debt for our own sins. Or when Peter asked Jesus how many times we should forgive another and suggested seven times. Jesus answered "I tell you not seven times seven but seventy times seven", sooo, does that mean we must forgive 490 times but on the 491st transgression we can throw forgiveness out the window and give them holy hell?

I don't understand what 'the smoke of their torment' rising forever means or the reference to their worm which doesn't die. Jesus spoke of Gehenna as the reference for hell and Gehenna is where trash was taken to be burned and destroyed. The wages of sin is death. Fear Him who can destroy body and soul in hell. The 2nd death. Eternal PUNISHMENT (not punishing).

I'm sorry but those who believe the Bible CLEARLY teaches that eternal cognizant torment is what the Bible teaches for the damned should follow another Biblical truth and that is not to lean on their own understanding. It is not only not clear but IMO highly doubtful. No matter, after we get to heaven I have no doubt that some things that we thought we clearly understood will be shown to be full of error. The one thing that IS clear is that God hates sin and no worker of iniiquity will inherit the kingdom of God including the many who profess Jesus is their Lord but do not obey Him.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Standing_Ultraviolet

Dunkleosteus
Jul 29, 2010
2,798
132
34
North Carolina
✟4,331.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I
The Bible is the inerrant word of God but not everything that we are told is to be taken literally. The parables are a good example. Doe anyone really believe that a servant could owe a debt of 10,000 talents (a talent being the equivalent of perhaps 15 times what the typical servant would earn in a year)? It is meant to show a debt that could not be paid back just as we can never pay the debt for our own sins. Or when Peter asked Jesus how many times we should forgive another and suggested seven times. Jesus answered "I tell you not seven times seven but seventy times seven", sooo, does that mean we must forgive 490 times but on the 491st transgression we can throw forgiveness out the window?

While this is true, some things definitely are to be taken literally. Obviously the 10,000 talents, as part of a parable, is made to represent a debt that no person could pay off, and obviously the reference to forgiving someone "seventy times seven" times is a way of saying that we should always be forgiving. At the same time, there are enough references to everlasting punishment and undying fire for it to be obvious that they're not just metaphorical.
 
Upvote 0

rstrats

Senior Member
Jun 27, 2002
1,895
83
Mid West
✟97,484.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
BondiHarry,

re: "...there are enough references to everlasting punishment and undying fire for it to be obvious that they're not just metaphorical."
 
But why do you want to believe that the punishment handed down is torture for eternity as opposed to annihilation for eternity?
 
Upvote 0

BondiHarry

Newbie
Mar 29, 2011
1,715
94
✟24,913.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
"there are enough references to everlasting punishment and undying fire for it to be obvious that the're not just metaphorical.:

Agreed and I do take 'the wages of sin is death' literally as I do the 'second death'. Death is a punishment and it will be eternal so it is eternal punishment. I also believe the lake of fire is an actual lake of fire which burns eternally and so is undying. What I cannot reconcile is this idea of eternal cognizant punishment in hell with the many other passages which tells us the damned will die or be destroyed. Indeed, I can find only ONE passage in all the Bible which cites such eternal cognizant punishment and that is Revelation 20:10 and this fate is reserved only for the devil and perhaps the beast and the false prophet.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.