TLK Valentine
I've already read the books you want burned.
- Apr 15, 2012
- 64,493
- 30,322
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Agnostic
- Marital Status
- Single
The opinion piece in question reads like a complete load, btw.
The anonymous"parent" gave very specific step-by-step descriptions of what allegedly happened in the classroom. Now, assuming the parent wasn't there, that means they got a detailed description, including quotes from the teacher, verbatim from the third-grade kid.
Kid's got quite the remarkable memory and an eye for detail, dontcha think? Must be a G&T program.
And why is the parent requesting anonymity? Fear of reprisal? From whom? The school? other parents? Wouldn't you want it known which class, and which teacher, was involved in this, so that other parents would ask their kids what happened in the class?
And isn't it a wonderful coincidence that this kid just so happened to hold on to his paper against the teacher's alleged instructions, just as the first one allegedly did, to show to a parent who was set out from the beginning to vindicate the first child's story -- and in so doing, vindicating the author as well?
And isn't it remarkably convenient that not only did the image have the website on it, but, being printed directly from the web (as the "page 1 of 1" on the top indicates), would have the exact url printed out on the bottom? Assuming of course that the teacher didn't change the print settings on the computer -- of course, nothing about the "handout" indicates a high level of computer literacy on the part of the owner...
And why is there no mention of the second parent confronting either the teacher or the principal? Seems like he/she went straight to Mr. Starnes with their story -- who has every reason to believe it, but no power to do anything constructive about it.
The whole thing smells like a McMartin case in the making...
The anonymous"parent" gave very specific step-by-step descriptions of what allegedly happened in the classroom. Now, assuming the parent wasn't there, that means they got a detailed description, including quotes from the teacher, verbatim from the third-grade kid.
Kid's got quite the remarkable memory and an eye for detail, dontcha think? Must be a G&T program.
And why is the parent requesting anonymity? Fear of reprisal? From whom? The school? other parents? Wouldn't you want it known which class, and which teacher, was involved in this, so that other parents would ask their kids what happened in the class?
And isn't it a wonderful coincidence that this kid just so happened to hold on to his paper against the teacher's alleged instructions, just as the first one allegedly did, to show to a parent who was set out from the beginning to vindicate the first child's story -- and in so doing, vindicating the author as well?
And isn't it remarkably convenient that not only did the image have the website on it, but, being printed directly from the web (as the "page 1 of 1" on the top indicates), would have the exact url printed out on the bottom? Assuming of course that the teacher didn't change the print settings on the computer -- of course, nothing about the "handout" indicates a high level of computer literacy on the part of the owner...
And why is there no mention of the second parent confronting either the teacher or the principal? Seems like he/she went straight to Mr. Starnes with their story -- who has every reason to believe it, but no power to do anything constructive about it.
The whole thing smells like a McMartin case in the making...
Upvote
0