There are those who say Elvis is still alive. Repeating that over and over doesn't make it true.
And how many times must "Common Core promoting Islam!!!!" be repeated before it becomes true?
I've already posted a direct link to the exact Common Core Standards; for your benefit, I'll do so again:
Read the Standards | Common Core State Standards Initiative
Now, find me where, in these standards, Islam is promoted or mentioned.
No more anecdotes, no more conspiracy theories -- let's go straight to the horse's mouth. Find Islam in the standards, or admit that it only exists in your imagination.
And yes, yes, we know already... Islam delenda est.... now find your enemy in the place you claim he is.
But what does that have to do with Common Core?
Answer: Nothing.
The United States Constitution does not say all religions are equal, and neither does the First Amendment. Try reading it.
I have read it -- more importantly, I follow it. Try following it.
The Establishment Clause prohibits the federal government from passing legislation to establish a state religion and from passing legislation mandating the preference of one religion over another on the citizenry. The Free Exercise clause prohibits the government from enacting legislation which prohibits or interferes with beliefs and opinions. But the Supreme Court has held the government can prohibit practices.
And what practices in particular would you like prohibited that aren't already?
The Constitution says all established religions are equally protected by the wording and context of the First Amendment, but it does not render all the worlds religions equal.
How exactly does one "establish" a religion?
Such as "there is no God but Allah, and Mohammad is his prophet?"
Where are your cries for separation of church and state? Intellectual honesty alone would demand as honest admission here, that if the lesson in question had this sentence in it:
"Christianity is the only true religion, Jesus is the way, and no man comes to the father in heaven but through him."
What are you babbling about? If you're referring to the alleged lessons where students were roleplaying being Muslims, I was upset about those -- of course, my concern was quickly drown out by the shouts of the professional complainers, who decided that the facts weren't enough to complain about.
You guys would be screaming bloody murder about separation of church and state, the promotion of Christianity in the public schools, all seasoned with charges of bigotry and racism. Yet when the lesson promotes Mohammad and Allah, you defend the public school promoting that particular belief because...its Islam, I guess.
Not at all -- I defended nothing; it seems, as I said, that the facts aren't enough to complain about.
So atheism is a religion? Again, thanks for confirming that.
Freedom of religion must include freedom from religion, else it's worthless.
Remember that the leash you want to put on the Muslims also fits you.
Satanist however worked the system to get their cult recognized as a religion in order to attack and diminish Christianity, because that is what they do. They, along with atheist, have used their status to restrict the free exercise of religion on the part of Christians.
Satanism is an established religion -- your opinion is irrelevant.
Satanist can believe any crap they want to, they are not free to practice whatever they want to.
Actually, they are, so long as they follow the laws -- same as you.
You can search for Common Core standards for world history, and find them.
Read the Standards | Common Core State Standards Initiative
I have -- they're not there. Care to try again?
Have you even bothered to read the Common Core yourself?
Again with the appeal to authority. I offer this challenge again. You want to debate the sanctity of public school teachers and the public school system, start a thread in Ethics and Morality and I will happily discuss the topic. But Ethics and Morality is where that thread would be appropriate.
My only authority is the fact that I actually have read and worked with the Common Core -- you, clearly, have not.
Why else would you insist it contains things which it doesn't, such as World History?
They are not being taught how to think. In order to arrive at informed opinions and conclusions, both sides of an issue must be presented. White-washing the presentation of Islam as the grand religion of peace and if only it weren't for Bush and the United States there would be no terrorism is indoctrination, not education.
Is demonizing it any better?
There are two problems inherent with the lesson introduced in the OP. First, it shouldn't have been presented at all unless, as you guys are so fond of saying, all other religions were given equal time. Second, following the sentence describing Mohammad enjoying meditation, there should be one describing Mohammad's enjoyment of little girls. Then at least you have balance.
If the focus of the legend was Islam, I would most certainly agree -- in fact, I agree that using Islam, or any religion in general was a bad idea fr a vocabulary assignment.
Vocabulary assignments, which they should be interesting, should also avoid controversy. I would've avoided any sort of religious theme and gone with something historical -- perhaps scientific -- Thomas Edison, perhaps?
Also, I don't think educating kids on the joys of pedophilia, as you suggest, is "balance."
There are so many things wrong with this statement it would take a dissertation to address them all. I will settle for you have no idea what you are talking about.
You're bluffing. Just admit you're wrong.
Slavery is both condoned and practiced in both the Old and New Testament, and was defended as such up until the Civil War... unless you're ready to show the chapter and verse where it was repealed? OT or NT will do...
Lucky us; secular law put a stop to that practice...
If this is what you truly think, you should be on my side. The English lesson in question could have been presented just as effectively without any mention of Mohammad or Allah or Islam. Someone chose to construct the lesson in that fashion, and if whoever it was had chosen to glorify Christianity instead, you would be foaming at the mouth demanding heads on a platter.
Maybe you haven't been paying attention, but I am on your side. The vocabulary lesson was poorly written, and would've been much better with no mention of any religion whatsoever. To do so was a mistake.
You're just missing the point, so I'll express it as simply as I can:
THAT MISTAKE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH COMMON CORE.
Really, all you have to do is read the standards, and you'll see that I can agree with you without the need to chant "Islam delenda est."
You see, Sistrin -- I choose to put the blame on the people who are actually responsible, not just the people I don't like.