S
Savior2006
Guest
So I guess we can assume liberals are okay with Religions being pushed in school as long as it isn't Christianity.
And So's Law again.
Man this doesn't get old.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So I guess we can assume liberals are okay with Religions being pushed in school as long as it isn't Christianity.
And So's Law again.
Man this doesn't get old.![]()
It's like the gift that keeps on giving. So's Law is a Christmas miracle!
And so the thread has successfully been turned from the Common Core worksheets to a debate about the source.
Where have I seen that tactic advocated before?
I'm just getting bored with your repetitiveness. especially since you don't address the issue.
What am I supposed to think when you keep calling Todd Starnes a liar,
You're implying that he's "evil" in your view,
You're only proving my earlier point...
I pointed out what form of propaganda it falls under, how about instead of attacking me you actually try reading...
You're admitting your earlier comment was off-base then?
Any other juvenile personal attacks?
I never said you were the one that made it, I was just making a general comment since some of the people in the thread I'm referring to are participating in this topic.
http://www.christianforums.com/t7854586/
So you have a reference.
Apparently Common Core vocab lesson plans discuss Muhammad in a positive light, while forbidding the discussion of other religions.
High School: Islamic vocabulary lesson part of Common Core standards | Fox News
Another source:
High school Common Core lesson promotes Muhammad, Islamic faith - Spokane Conservative | Examiner.com
For whatever reason we do not consider it a threat to learn that other ways of life and religion exist without demonizing their adherents.
It works for us, you should try it.
Only in the US would it be considered a bad thing for children to learn about their world.
Well Sis, since we don't have anything beyond a handful of blogisphere sites making claims and a known propagandist taking his slight as 100% guaranteed scientific proof of the claims in the OP, what else is there to discuss? Perhaps some intrepid investigator could get a copy of the workbook and check it's content.
Nah, that would require work. Better to spread rumor and innuendo over the Internet than to fact check, right?
Ah hah! Finally found something and I do think these questions are totally inappropriate for a vocabulary lesson. I'm not going to link to it because of language and racist content, but if you find Dianne Lynn Savage's profile on Facebook, she had a friend scan one redacted (a single question) and two full pages.
I found it and I don't see the problem aside from the questions being poorly written.
Also, did anyone establish what this had to do with common core?
I doubt there is any intent to proselytize here; just school administrators being incompetent again and not thinking through their assumptions.
I would like to think you are correct here, as many public school administrators epitomize the Peter Principal. But given the public school system is dominated by progressives it is most probable intent outweighs incompetence.
Don't underestimate the power of incompetence.![]()