Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Now I know that you must not have much in the way of reading comprehension skills. First, Lot did not throw his daughters to the crowd, let alone give them to the angels to rape. You do know who the angels were, don't you? Well, probably not, but let's just say that it's pretty blasphemous to call those 2 rapists. You'd better be real sure!
Abraham got God to agree that if God found 10 righteous people in the city, he would save it. God agreed. Well, we have Lot, his wife, his 2 virgin daughters. That's 4 people. He couldn't even talk his sons-in-law and married daughters into leaving. That's pathetic. Moses wouldn't be alive for another 600 years or so. He couldn't have talked to God about saving Sodom - Sodom was already brimstone!
I condemn fornication and adultery as well. They are as destructive but no one participating is saying that it's not sin!It's funny how you use Leviticus to support your prejudice and condemnation of homosexuals, but I doubt you'd support the stoning of children or burning of witches, also supported by the Old Testament. Then again, with fundamentalists, you never know...
Fornication is the overwhelmingly majority of sexual sins, yet I don't hear fundamentalists ever condemning that. It's always against homosexuals, a very tiny minority.
I read this and don't know whether to laugh or cry. This is very basic Bible knowledge - doesn't take an obsessive scholar to understand these things!
So sorry, but until their motives become loving, then they are in no position to criticize the motives of Christians. So if you condemn them, and the overwhelming majority of humans commit at least one of those 2 sins, making it by far the worst of the sexual sins, why does homosexuality get far more attention from the fundamentalists?
Unbelievers aren't allowed to post here, so I have no idea why your post is directed to them.What unbelievers fail to see is that we Christians endure incessants attacks and attacks against our Lord to witness to them so they'll go to heaven. So what are their motives for trying to keep people from heaven? The notion that they are omniscient enough to claim that they are right and Jesus is wrong?
What unbelievers fail to see is that we Christians endure incessants attacks and attacks against our Lord to witness to them so they'll go to heaven. So what are their motives for trying to keep people from heaven? The notion that they are omniscient enough to claim that they are right and Jesus is wrong?
Please quote me the verse about ripping a child's tongue out for talking back to his parents. I don't remember where that is.
Sorry, let me be a literalist for a moment, and rest my mind for a bit...
Deuteronomy 21:18-21 ( i know you fundies love those digits)...If a man have a stubborn /rebellioius son (again, guess if it's a daughter, in fundie speak..it's ok) (which I guess for fundies, if it's a WOMAN, then the stubborn child is ok, since there is no reference to it)which will not obey the voice of this father and that, when they have chastened him will not harken unto them, then sall this father lay hold on him and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and the men of the city shalls tone him with stones that he shall die. (fundie women..ur saved here..bible doesn't reference you, so breath a little easier)
Such ignorance of scripture is no defense. You defend yourself with empty rhetoric and slogans, not scriptural truth.
Plese don't tell me what "spiritual truth" is when you turn into some ugly and as a weapon to get people to bow to your judgements.
I agree with you about Lot offering up his daughters - that was abominable but it might have been preferable to what happened to Lot and his daughters later, mighten it?
EEK - edited to add that you said Lot wanted to throw his daughters to the angels to be raped. I'd like a chapter and verse on that little tidbit also!
Oops, my bad..didn't know you walked the planet 2000+ years ago, so do tell me who the angels were. As far as my comprehension skills oh kind one, while you may believe in excercising gay men and women, perhaps there may be a few things you can related to...he with no sin cast the first stone:Exodus 21:17 - and he that curseth this father, shall surely be put to deathNow I know that you must not have much in the way of reading comprehension skills. First, Lot did not throw his daughters to the crowd, let alone give them to the angels to rape. You do know who the angels were, don't you? Well, probably not, but let's just say that it's pretty blasphemous to call those 2 rapists. You'd better be real sure!
God didn't write those verses, so what makes you think he said that? And you pick and choose which you want to believe all the time, unless you believe the Earth is flat and children should be stoned to death.
Why, so you can tell me how much better you are than me, and how unsaved I am? No thanks, it's none of your business.
