You missed it again. Joneysd.
really what did I miss?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You missed it again. Joneysd.
You missed it again. Joneysd.
She missed what?
so Jesus cannot be in heaven with God as Jesus never got married and did not have a mormon temple ceremony.
This is a good example of what was mentioned in one of the other threads. LDS have on multiple occasions explained this process, but our critics continue to make ridiculous statemenents that are nothing like what we believe. Proxy marriages are done for those who were married during their life. There is no fantasy matchup marriage like what you suggest above. The individuals can accept them, or reject them, as they wish. It is not forced upon them. It is provided as an opportunity if they want it.
What purpose does it serve to continually, and I suspect purposely, misrepresent LDS beliefs in this manner?
:o
Please explain to us the process in which two unmarried, dead people are determined to be suitable for marriage in a sealing ceremony in a Mormon temple. How is it determined who will be given the opportunity to marry a specific individual and how is it known if they actually accept the opportunity and are eternally married? It is a mystery to me.
What happens with dead children? Are they also sealed in a Temple so they can attain to the highest level of the Celestial Kingdom?
What are you talking about?
I made no comment about Jesus being in heaven with, or without, God. I directly addressed the fantasy argument of a marriage between Queen Elizabeth and Ceasar. You seem to be far afield from what I discussed.
:o
Did you read my post? I answered that already. I thought it was pretty clear. However, feel free to point out what part of it was hard to understand or otherwise confusing and I'll do my best to clarify it.
![]()
If I had my father sealed to one of his parents, which one would I choose? His parents divorced and probably wouldn't want to be sealed to each other.
And, in my case, I don't want to be sealed to a stepparent.
Children are sealed to their parents. Both parents - not one of them.
![]()
I actually did read your post (#38). Here is what you wrote -
Proxy marriages are done for those who were married during their life.
There is no fantasy matchup marriage like what you suggest above.
The individuals can accept them, or reject them, as they wish. It is not forced upon them. It is provided as an opportunity if they want it.
Please show me precisely where and how you explained the methodology used by the LDS in determining who will marry whom in the afterlife.
Thank you.
What good is that if the parents aren't sealed to each other?
What about the children from the second marriages? Who are they sealed to?
It provides the sealing to both parents. No revelation, that I'm aware of, tells us exactly how this will be resolved in heaven. However, since they are already sealed to both parents should it be a case of having to make a choice of which one they choose to be grouped with the work will have already been done.
They are still sealed to their parents. As I stated above, I'm not aware of any revelation about how it all gets sorted out in the end. But as I trust that God is wise and kind I'm sure that it will work out just fine.
IOW, the doctrine of eternal families is a farce. If half siblings are sealed to their parents, and the other half siblings sealed to the mother and her first husband, the siblings aren't one family. And the mother can't have both husbands.
There you go. I eliminated the portion of my post that didn't directly respond to this specific question and seperated them by points.
![]()