durangodawood
re Member
- Aug 28, 2007
- 27,489
- 19,173
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
I'm leaning on the rational basis that proponents of each theory have already provided. Generally they each hold water, I think. Just not all the water.And which ethical position is this?
Does it have a name?
Does it have a rational method (because just about all of the moral positions of significance claim to be 'rational,' despite the fact that they can come to different conclusions of moral valuation and evaluation)?
Do we want to call it "Durangodawood-atology," or something like that?![]()
I'm willing to shift a few % here and there.
Upvote
0