selfinflikted
Under Deck
- Jul 13, 2006
- 11,441
- 786
- 46
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Democrat
So Christians don´t do better, but they do better?
I think you got it, now.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So Christians don´t do better, but they do better?
Or, the the writers of the bible, knowing that these tests would fail, simply added the "do not test" clause. That is far more parsimoniousI'm not sure about that. That seems to be more along the lines of being crazy if anything. The bible says do not tempt God.
Matthew 4:7
Jesus answered him, "It is also written: 'Do not put the Lord your God to the test.'"
Proving God through putting him to the test is more about a lack of faith and placing God in some box. It speaks more about a man made means of proof and a skeptical attitude and not trusting God. God does not prove himself so that people can believe. It is by believing that we are saved the other way around. But God has and will do great things to save people and will look after us if we trust and believe in him. But asking for this type of test is bring things down to mans way of thinking and proving things which is putting God down and lowering him to our level.
You've pretty much got it if you take out the sinister undertones of the agenda.No its more than objectivity. Thats why people are outed and religious people are busted for being hypocrites. Because they dont practice what they preach and are not who they say they are. It can be proven and exposed. Non Christians just want to change the goal posts so they can attribute all these non christian behaviors to them and bring down the status of the righteous and worthy God who is the same always and can stand undisputed among all. Man is the one who adds his own interpretation and behaviors to religion.
But you're wrong about objectivity. This is exactly what objectivity is. You have to look at it from the standpoint of someone who doesn't have a preference for any religion. From such a standpoint, every religion is just a man-made institution, meaning that the opinions and values of the current members of a religion are just as valid and as representative of the institution as the ideas of its founders. Now, we generally allow certain goalposts to remain when we're talking about institutions such as political parties and religions just so that the names of these institutions retain some level of meaning, which is why we use terms such as "radical Islam" and the "Religious Right." These goalposts are probably more rigid than they should be, but we all know that allowing the radicals to be called the same thing as the rest of a group only serves to subject all of the members to prejudice and violence.I know this is perhaps off-topic but are you seriously suggesting that Christ was a Christian?No did Christ think he was superior to others even though he was the son of God. No he was humble and even went to the point of washing the feet of his disciples. This was done before a meal and was done by the lowest of servants. He was showing his humility and that he was an obedient servant to God the fathers will.
I know this is perhaps off-topic but are you seriously suggesting that Christ was a Christian?
I would hope so, but you don't seem to understand or value objectivity. You can't personally decide who's Christian and who's not and claim to be conducting valid research.I think I know how to research after 40 plus years of life and study.
I'm in my sixteenth year of Catholic education. I'm good. And as I've already said, this is irrelevant to objective demographic research.If you want to know what attributes Christ had and teaches us in how we can inherit the kingdom of heaven then the New testament is full of them. Specifically the sermon on the Mount and the
beatitudes.
THE EIGHT BEATITUDES OF JESUS
I would hope so, but you don't seem to understand or value objectivity. You can't personally decide who's Christian and who's not and claim to be conducting valid research.
I'm in my sixteenth year of Catholic education. I'm good. And as I've already said, this is irrelevant to objective demographic research.
Well, people notice they have to find a way to get along with each other while they are alive. So, apparently unlike you, they do care.I still find no use for morality in an atheistic belief. Life won't exist, so who care's?
I still find no use for morality in an atheistic belief. Life won't exist, so who care's?
I still find no use for morality in an atheistic belief. Life won't exist, so who care's?
Is the only reason you are decent to others is to avoid hell? Do you not actually care about your friends, family, neighbors, and coworkers?
Of course he doesn't, because Jesus said you should hate your family.
Now great crowds accompanied him, and he turned and said to them, If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple. Whoever does not bear his own cross and come after me cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:25-27 ESV)
I still find no use for morality in an atheistic belief. Life won't exist, so who care's?
I still find no use for morality in an atheistic belief. Life won't exist, so who care's?
I still find no use for morality in an atheistic belief. Life won't exist, so who care's?