RAMIFICATIONS FOR AMILLENIALISTS (2)
We have all heard of the
‘the 1260 days.’ Futurists place these at Jesus’ 2nd coming and, as usual, are very literalistic about it. They also conflate it with the last half of Daniels 70 weeks. That is wrong as shown on post #35.
However, Amill’s need to speak more definitively as to what these days actually
do mean. Some say they have already happened between AD 67-70 when the temple was destroyed, hence not happen again. Some join with futurists saying they tie back to the 70th week; others don’t. Still others, point to the ‘short season’ (Rev 20:3) but don’t give a clear explanation as to how or why. It doesn’t complete the Amill argument if we answer the 1000-year question well but not the 1260-day one IMO. So, let’s start.
- First, the 1260 days were a repeating formula in the original Hebrew calendar.
- It was both literal but also figurative representing a very short period of time.
- The modern Jewish calendar no longer uses it. It was replaced in the Greek era.
Therefore, the 1260 days will indeed arrive in the future but is a symbolic figure representing a
‘short time of trial’ after the Times of the Gentiles and ending with the resurrection. No, it will not be a precise literal count; yes, it is the same time as the ‘short season’ mentioned in Revelation 20:3.
Thoughts welcome. (Yes, I am Amill)