10 Scientific Facts Evolution is Wrong

[HitchSlap]

Actually I did think of it, but I wanted to leave the list at ten items, to correspond with my other list.

But it's the atheist's nightmare!

 

[AV1611VET]

But it's the atheist's nightmare!

You have a third one too:

Bible Prophecy - The Atheist's Nightmare

 

[Loudmouth]

You have a third one too:

Bible Prophecy - The Atheist's Nightmare

Yes, it is an atheist nightmare when a deity is supposed to come back to Earth, and never does.

Next week's nightmare for atheists is Zeus not throwing thunderbolts, and Santa Claus not appearing.

 

[bhsmte]

This is all, of course, completely wrong.

And I must ask you, if this in any way was correct. Dont you think that thise who work with biology professionaly would have noticed?

No, it is all a scientific conspiracy and tens of thousands of scientists are in on it.

 

[RickG]

No, it is all a scientific conspiracy and tens of thousands of scientists are in on it.

Hey! How can I get on the payroll?

 

[DogmaHunter]

Falsehoods, lies and PRATTs can take a hike.

 

[Dizredux]

Hey! How can I get on the payroll?

You didn't weren't hired? Did you apply?

I am sorry but the application deadline expired three days ago. Maybe next time.

I did hear a rumor that the EAC was considering adding some people.

Dizredux

 

[Strathos]

Does that include quoting the Bible?

They were people too, you know.

If you really believed that evidence can take a hike, you wouldn't need to quote anything but the Bible.

 

[Armoured]

If you really believed that evidence can take a hike, you wouldn't need to quote anything but the Bible.

Nor using a computer.

 

[AV1611VET]

If you really believed that evidence can take a hike, you wouldn't need to quote anything but the Bible.

Not with the questions I get.

They are usually geared to be answered without a supporting verse.

Then they complain I'm making it up.

 

[selfinflikted]

He's against evolution though, and that's what counts.

So, it really doesn't matter if someone has to lie, steal, or cheat to make their point, as long as the end result agrees with your beliefs, that's all that counts?

Wow. So much for integrity.

 

[VProud]

This is all, of course, completely wrong.

And I must ask you, if this in any way was correct. Dont you think that thise who work with biology professionaly would have noticed?

Oh, how did we miss it! HOW COULD WE HAVE BEEN SO BLIND?!

Seriously though, I have no legitimate response to this.

I don't even understand how you argue against something like this.

Maybe this will help:

Not even wrong - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Kylie]

Here are ten scientific facts that evolution is wrong:

1. Birds prove natural selection is naturally wrong.

2. Species without a link.

3. Missing inferior evolutionary branches.

4. Single cell complexity.

5. Human egg and sperm.

6. DNA error checking.

7. Chaos from organization.

8. Chromosome count.

9. Origin of matter and stars.

10. Peanut butter.

For an in depth explanation of the first nine, QV: SOURCE.

All of these are absolutely laughable. Perhaps if you actually explain why these disprove evolution, you;d appear to make more sense (but I won't hold my breath...).

 

[AV1611VET]

All of these are absolutely laughable.

"Laughable" sans explanation -- interesting initial reaction.

Perhaps if you actually explain why these disprove evolution, you;d appear to make more sense (but I won't hold my breath...).

Why do you think I provided that link?

 

[Subduction Zone]

"Laughable" sans explanation -- interesting initial reaction.

Why do you think I provided that link?

You wanted to share the laughter?

 

[Strathos]

"Laughable" sans explanation -- interesting initial reaction.

You've had these things explained to you time and time again but you keep ignoring the explanations and posting the same debunked arguments over and over again. It's obvious that you don't care that any given objections you can come up with have answers, you are not interested in investigating the facts, or actually paying attention when people try to educate you on these subjects. So why do you even bother posting this stuff in the first place? You're not making any arguments that everyone here hasn't heard before, and you're not interested in learning why those arguments are wrong. What do you hope to accomplish?

 

[Kylie]

"Laughable" sans explanation -- interesting initial reaction.

Okay. The explanation as to why they are laughable is because these things do not actually prove that evolution is false.

Or do you like playing with strawmen?

Why do you think I provided that link?

Because you have no understanding of science and are willing to regurgitate whatever nonsense some internet creationist* spews forth just because you think it's a good argument?

(Of course, your definition of a good argument is "any argument that agrees with what I've decided is true" isn't it?)

*Internet creationist. Noun. A person who believes in some form of religious creationism and is so determined to prove their worldview true that they sit in front of a computer, trawling the internet for articles about biology and other fields of science. According to the person's limited understanding of actual science, these articles allegedly show that some aspect of science is incorrect. This person never does any research of their own to check the validity of their conclusions, and never actually does any research to find out what the actual science in question really says, but leaps to a conclusion that supports their creationist worldview because they can't find any actual scientific evidence to do so and they really really want to convince others that their worldview is true, because (as we know), the more people believe something, the more true it is.

 

[Mr Strawberry]

My wife's signature verse is:

1 Corinthians 2:2 For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.

You don't have children do you?

 

[AV1611VET]

You're not making any arguments that everyone here hasn't heard before,

Is that why you can't explain embedded age creation without getting it wrong?

 

[AV1611VET]

Because you have no understanding of science and are willing to regurgitate whatever nonsense some internet creationist* spews forth just because you think it's a good argument?

Am I a bad boy for having started this OP?