10 Scientific Facts Evolution is Wrong

[AV1611VET]

Here are ten scientific facts that evolution is wrong:

1. Birds prove natural selection is naturally wrong.

2. Species without a link.

3. Missing inferior evolutionary branches.

4. Single cell complexity.

5. Human egg and sperm.

6. DNA error checking.

7. Chaos from organization.

8. Chromosome count.

9. Origin of matter and stars.

10. Peanut butter.

For an in depth explanation of the first nine, QV: SOURCE.

 

[VirOptimus]

This is all, of course, completely wrong.

And I must ask you, if this in any way was correct. Dont you think that thise who work with biology professionaly would have noticed?

 

[Mainframes]

That link has got to be an example of one of the most ignorant people alive today.

I mean really - people at the equator should have reflective skin and people at the poles should have dark skin....? Has this guy never heard of Melamin and Vitamin D production....?

Cant be bothered to go through the rest but it bordered on so idiotic it must be a wind up.

 

[Delphiki]

The Theory of Evolution is not a scientific law or a law of biology. A scientific law must be 100% correct. - See more at: 9 Scienctific Facts Prove the "Theory of Evolution" is False | Humans Are Free

See if you can guess why the rest of the webpage is worth ignoring.

 

[RickG]

Here are ten scientific facts that evolution is wrong:

9. Origin of matter and stars.

Even Eric Hovind gets really confused on that one. But I'm not supprised, he uses his dad's circular reasoning mime, which is an excellent example of complete ignorance on the formation of elements.

The Creationist Attack on Science 10 - YouTube

10. Peanut butter.

Ah! Ray Comfort. "Mama always said, stupid is as stupid does." (Forrest Gump)

 

[Delphiki]

Ah! Ray Comfort. "Mama always said, stupid is as stupid does." (Forrest Gump)

I believe credit for that one goes to Chuck Missler. Ray Comfort is the banana expert. Both ingredients, however, go well together on white bread, sometimes with a touch of honey.

 

[AV1611VET]

Dont you think that thise who work with biology professionaly would have noticed?

Myopic? blind? mental blocks? love of money? worshiping creation?

No.

Amateurs built the Ark, professionals built the Deepwater Horizon.

 

[AV1611VET]

That link has got to be an example of one of the most ignorant people alive today.

Sounds like my kinda guy!

 

[AV1611VET]

See if you can guess why the rest of the webpage is worth ignoring.

I chuckled when I read that one.

I thought to myself, "No way am I gonna pass up making a thread outta this one!"

He's against evolution though, and that's what counts.

 

[Delphiki]

I chuckled when I read that one.

I thought to myself, "No way am I gonna pass up making a thread outta this one!"

He's against evolution though, and that's what counts.

It seems he's just totally ignorant to anything having to do with science, not just evolution.

Theories don't graduate into laws, and laws aren't always 100% correct. He's got so many things wrong in the first two sentences alone. If the author doesn't know these things, then why should anyone bother reading the rest of it? The entire page is non-stop PRATTs.

 

[AV1611VET]

It seems he's just totally ignorant to anything having to do with science, not just evolution.

John 1:46 And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see.

Theories don't graduate into laws, and laws aren't always 100% correct. He's got so many things wrong in the first two sentences alone.

What's that axiom you guys like to use on us?

Even a broken clock is right twice a day?

If the author doesn't know these things, then why should anyone bother reading the rest of it?

Entertainment?

To fuel some fake indignation?

Fodder for venting and ridicule?

The entire page is non-stop PRATTs.

Page of what? the Bible or the link? (or both?)

 

[[serious]]

I chuckled when I read that one.

I thought to myself, "No way am I gonna pass up making a thread outta this one!"

He's against evolution though, and that's what counts.

So are pastafarians! Common cause!

 

[AV1611VET]

So are pastafarians!

Groovy!

 

[Split Rock]

Here are ten scientific facts that evolution is wrong:

...
For an in depth explanation of the first nine, QV: SOURCE.

I stopped after reading the first line:
"The Theory of Evolution is not a scientific law or a law of biology. A scientific law must be 100% correct."

I chuckled when I read that one.

I thought to myself, "No way am I gonna pass up making a thread outta this one!"

He's against evolution though, and that's what counts.

Really? If he's a fool and makes Christianity look foolish, that doesn't matter?

 

[AV1611VET]

I stopped after reading the first line:
"The Theory of Evolution is not a scientific law or a law of biology. A scientific law must be 100% correct."

Your prerogative -- we call that "freewill".

Really?

Yipper.

If he's a fool and makes Christianity look foolish,

Trying to make me jealous, are you?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Here are ten scientific facts that evolution is wrong:

1. Birds prove natural selection is naturally wrong.

2. Species without a link.

3. Missing inferior evolutionary branches.

4. Single cell complexity.

5. Human egg and sperm.

6. DNA error checking.

7. Chaos from organization.

8. Chromosome count.

9. Origin of matter and stars.

10. Peanut butter.

For an in depth explanation of the first nine, QV: SOURCE.

When AV uses sources like this I seriously think that he is a secret poe and was on the evolution side all of the time.

 

[AV1611VET]

When AV uses sources like this I seriously think that he is a secret poe and was on the evolution side all of the time.

And what am I when I use the Bible as my source?

(Please hold your answer to two or three; and respect site rules.)

 

[Subduction Zone]

And what am I when I use the Bible as my source?

(Please hold your answer to two or three; and respect site rules.)

I don't know if it is possible to answer your question and to respect site rules.

 

[AV1611VET]

I don't know if it is possible to answer your question and to respect site rules.

So it's easier for you to comment if I use sites like that, than it is for me to use the Bible?

 

[Delphiki]

So it's easier for you to comment if I use sites like that, than it is for me to use the Bible?

It's better to avoid both and just look at the universe around you. Lift your head up and away from the words of confused people and point it straight ahead or to the sky for once.