Trump, Biden win New Hampshire. Exit poll finds 27% Of Nikki Haley’s Voters Are Republicans

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,359
3,122
Minnesota
✟215,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
So, if I can contextualize this, NH had an oddity in their voter registration. You can register Republican, you can register Democrat, and you can register Undeclared. If you are registered undeclared, you pick your ballot on primary day.

To further complicate this, a lot of people are upset that Biden/DNC are trying to usurp the first in the nation vote status and chose to vote accordingly by either voting for another Democrat or pulling the Republican ballot.

So, for example, I am undeclared, I chose a Democrat ballot, wrote in Biden, then to avoid being auto-registered by the party of the last ballot I took, I go to a table and re-declare my Undeclared status. I will vote for Biden in the final election.

My father, also Undeclared, pulled a Republican ballot and voted for Haley and promptly redeclared his Undeclared status. In the final election, he will also be voting for Biden regardless of the Republican nominee. He was upset at Biden and the DNC slight to our state and wanted to voice it by pulling the Republican ballot and voting for not Trump.

My husband, same deal, he pulled the Republican ballot (and wrote in “Walter Sobchak”) to voice his displeasure to the DNC. He will also vote for Biden in the final election.

So, despite the article being structured to seem like she pulled registered Democrats over to vote for her, the reality is she pulled a lot of Undeclared. And of those Undeclared, there’s a fair number who did the Republican ballot as part of a grassroots campaign to protest the DNC, not because they’ll ultimately vote that way.

The more interesting breakdown will be to see if there were more Republican ballots pulled than normal and, if so, how many were pulled to protest the DNC.
I don't know much about New Hampshire. I do know that the corrupt Bush administration people lobbied to put an establishment guy in there--Sununu. A Mitch McConnell kind of establishment guy.
 
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
4,790
3,135
New England
✟195,052.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I don't know much about New Hampshire. I do know that the corrupt Bush administration people lobbied to put an establishment guy in there--Sununu. A Mitch McConnell kind of establishment guy.
He’s not a Mitch McConnell… He’s selectively pro choice, selectively pro gay marriage, and he did veto a “parental rights” bill of mandatory pronoun/sexual orientation disclosure of students to parents. McConnell would never and, frankly, neither would most NH people.

But he flip-flops on if he’s a Trump sycophant or a never Trump, and, as I said, not consistent on his stances for choice, LGBTQA+ rights, etc.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,359
3,122
Minnesota
✟215,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
As for the Hemingway Tweet, where is the statement by Georgia's State Election Board? The only thing I can find is the one that acknowledged that, during one of the audits, that various mistakes were made by election workers. The issue is, there were 4 recounts down in Georgia; including one that was a hand recount, meaning done without the machines. The issue, despite the mistakes during one recount, and even without using machines, the votes totals were very similar in all four recounts. The mistakes made in the one recount didn't actually make much of a difference in the vote totals, nor did the machines (based on the hand recount) change the vote counts.

But maybe I'm missing something but the Tweet by Emerald Robinson is short on details, much less actual claims.



Yes, a person is claiming there were 150,000 mail-in ballots that weren't folded and had perfectly filled in ovals. The issue, he has no evidence that these ballots actually exist, it is something he claims to have heard about and he is waiting to have a case heard and for the court to allow him to examine all the ballots.

Of course, the biggest issue with this is the fact that Biden didn't get 150,000 more votes than Clinton got in 2016 in Fulton County. In fact, Biden received fewer votes than Clinton did in 2016 -- Trump gained a higher percentage of Fulton County votes in 2020. This makes it very weird for people to make the claim that cheating by the Democrats in Fulton County lost Trump the election.

Instead, Trump (as well as the two Senate races) lost Georgia because of suburban women -- in 2016 those "soccer moms" voted for Trump, in 2020 they voted for Biden. Again, if it the results on Georgia were based on the difference in the Fulton County vote between 2016 and 2020, then Trump would have won (as he had a higher percentage of votes in that county); this tends to destroy the idea that some form of "cheating" in Fulton County is why Biden won.
There was a lot of dishonesty and the part of election officials in Georgia. They should have been focused upon holding people accountable, the same for states where laws were clearly broken. Believe you me I've dealt with many dishonest officials and when nothing happens to them they just become emboldened. So much came out long after the election, so the focus is to make sure the elections are fair and proper in the future, voter ID, etc. Not to forget stopping government entities participating in election interference. It was interesting, 24% of voters in N.H. said they were very conservative as compared with Iowa where it was 52%. To me that does not bode well for Nikki, in my opinion most people just see Trump doing better on the major issues, I suppose because he was successful with the border, the economy, and foreign policy. She's much more of an unknown.
 
Upvote 0

JSRG

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2019
1,447
827
Midwest
✟161,213.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
...CNN exit poll. The question was, "Do you think Biden legitimately won in 2020?"

AMONG TRUMP VOTERS
Yes: 17%
No: 80%

AMONG HALEY VOTERS
Yes: 83%
No: 15%

80% of Republican NH primary voters believe the Big Lie.
In a little bit of fairness, "legitimately" is vague. If we're talking about someone believing the false claims Trump and others made about a bunch of fake Biden ballots and such that made Biden win the election, those claims are appear quite false. A good if lengthy writeup, by someone who dislikes both Trump and Biden for the record, is here:

However, if we're talking about questions like whether the media was favoring Biden unfairly, or whether some judges might have given incorrect rulings prior to the election allowing for voting that the law didn't actually allow, those are more debatable, and I could see someone asserting those as making it so Biden didn't "legitimately win".

Granted, I might be giving too much credit to people who said "no" to the question. Most probably bought into the debunked fraud claims. But I do expect at least some of them were saying "no" on the basis of the more reasonable things I mentioned rather than the false claims like there being enough fake ballots to flip the election.
 
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
4,790
3,135
New England
✟195,052.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In a little bit of fairness, "legitimately" is vague. If we're talking about someone believing the false claims Trump and others made about a bunch of fake Biden ballots and such that made Biden win the election, those claims are appear quite false (a good if lengthy writeup is here, and by someone who dislikes both Trump and Biden for the record).

However, if we're talking about questions like whether the media was favoring Biden unfairly, or whether some judges might have given incorrect rulings prior to the election allowing for voting that the law didn't actually allow, those are more debatable, and I could see someone asserting those as making it so Biden didn't "legitimately win".

Granted, I might be giving too much credit to people who said "no" to the question. Most probably bought into the debunked fraud claims. But I do expect at least some of them were saying "no" on the basis of the more reasonable things I mentioned rather than the false claims like there being enough fake ballots to flip the election.
You’re giving too much credit. Every Trumper I’ve ever met here will tell you Biden stole the election. Ride though towns in Sullivan or Grafton County, signs for Trump are almost universally paired with “stop the steal” signs, even now.

Remember it was the dude in the town hall who said “12 years of Trump!” That was NH.

The stop the steal thing REALLY latched on here. I can only assume because so, so, so many places in NH still do paper ballots and count by hand, where they literally know ballot counters by name, so the idea of “computers = bad” or “I can see ol’ Ethel would be the type to stuff the ballots for Crazy Joe” seems more plausible to people than the reality that it didn’t happen.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
39,292
20,292
US
✟1,477,328.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I did. It was expected that many would cross over from the Democrats or independents who lean left. The Boston Globe encouraged this. That's why I think Trump spent time campaigning, which once you get the issues of foreign affairs, the economy, and the border out there I figured he would win.
Who was it expected by? Which poll predicted a Haley victory?
 
Upvote 0

SimplyMe

Senior Veteran
Jul 19, 2003
9,725
9,445
the Great Basin
✟330,309.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There was a lot of dishonesty and the part of election officials in Georgia.

Your evidence for that? And why would Trump-supporting Republican election officials (pretty much all of the state elections officials) participate in dishonesty?

They should have been focused upon holding people accountable, the same for states where laws were clearly broken.

As you've been asked at least three times, exactly what state laws were broken?

Believe you me I've dealt with many dishonest officials and when nothing happens to them they just become emboldened. So much came out long after the election, so the focus is to make sure the elections are fair and proper in the future, voter ID, etc. Not to forget stopping government entities participating in election interference.

And, again, talking about Georgia, they had voter ID and, on top of that, they've made their voting laws even more strict. They've chased down pretty much every claim (or tried to) to include those by the 2,000 mules video (which apparently still hasn't sent their information to Georgia election officials).

It was interesting, 24% of voters in N.H. said they were very conservative as compared with Iowa where it was 52%. To me that does not bode well for Nikki, in my opinion most people just see Trump doing better on the major issues, I suppose because he was successful with the border, the economy, and foreign policy. She's much more of an unknown.
 
Upvote 0

perplexed

Senior Member
Jun 22, 2005
2,084
477
50
✟101,449.00
Faith
Seeker
That doesn't tell us how many. Over and over people were inundated with the message that it was the most safe and secure election ever! And many Biden followers still believe it, many don't even know that election laws were broken. The power of the media.
I take it you believed Trump when he said Dominion voting changed millions of votes.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,359
3,122
Minnesota
✟215,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Your evidence for that? And why would Trump-supporting Republican election officials (pretty much all of the state elections officials) participate in dishonesty?

Executive branch agencies put out false information, colluding with social media, to protect and promote Joe Biden. While courts have ruled about states violating election laws, in Georgia there was no such ruling. As to Georgia, election officials lied as to their explanation as to why the counting paused--they lied multiple times. And they lied about there always being an observer present. What I observed in Georgia was dishonesty. And usually where there's smoke there's fire. So a lot of people have no problem with Trump when Trump says the election was "rigged," they see that as a within reason characterization. It's not like the Biden administration claiming the border is safe, closed, and secure. I am concerned there are too many people in denial about election wrongdoing, and for the good of the country the elections system needs to be fixed to a point where it is beyond reproach. I'd start in Detroit.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SimplyMe

Senior Veteran
Jul 19, 2003
9,725
9,445
the Great Basin
✟330,309.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Executive branch agencies put out false information, colluding with social media, to protect and promote Joe Biden.

Yes, you've mentioned before you you believe Trump (the Executive Branch) helped Biden win the election. And the posts that the Biden campaign was trying to get removed from social media were the inappropriate contentographic ones of his son, which tend to be illegal to reproduced online (revenge inappropriate content laws).

Of course, you'll probably point out the letter by "intelligence analysts" but the letter wasn't put out by people in an "executive agency"; rather they were former government workers who were working in the private sector. They gave their opinion, which though you might disagree with it, was not illegal in any way.

While courts have ruled about states violating election laws, in Georgia there was no such ruling. As to Georgia, election officials lied as to their explanation as to why the counting paused--they lied multiple times.

Except that counting didn't actually paused. Instead, election workers believed they were going home in one county (which is why many observers went home). A call came from the state election office telling them they were not allowed to go home, that they needed to keep counting, at which point counting resumed.

And they lied about there always being an observer present.

I'd love to see your evidence for this. I assume you have something more than Giuliani's highly edited video, which he has admitted in a sworn statement was done for him to promote lies about the election and how it was stolen.

What I observed in Georgia was dishonesty. And usually where there's smoke there's fire.

Except three years later there is no actual evidence of fire. What's more, many of the claims of "smoke," such as Giuliani's (not to mention Lindell's about the voting machines) were proven to be false.

So a lot of people have no problem with Trump when Trump says the election was "rigged," they see that as a within reason characterization. It's not like the Biden administration claiming the border is safe, closed, and secure. I am concerned there are too many people in denial about election wrongdoing, and for the good of the country the elections system needs to be fixed to a point where it is beyond reproach. I'd start in Detroit.

I'm still waiting for you to produce any evidence. So far, all I've really seen from you is claims about counting "stopping" and bad explanations -- though, again, counting wasn't actually stopped -- and that "affidavits" of things were sworn and your claim that people wouldn't lie about what they saw because they did it under "penalty of perjury." Of course, I've shown you video, in court, where Trump lawyers talked about how many of the affidavits they received were clearly false -- so the "penalty of perjury" really wasn't much of a deterrent. Additionally, back when these were being heard in court, I actually showed you the ruling from a judge, in Detroit, where he went through many of these affidavits and explained many merely showed that, rather than showing fraud, they merely confirmed that election officials were doing things correctly (those submitting the affidavits didn't understand the process) and many were downright false (such as a "boxes of votes" being brought in was actually just a cameraman from a local news station bringing his equipment in for a live shot for the late news). The judge found none that even hinted at any actual wrongdoing, much less fraud.

Sometimes the "smoke" is just arsonists trying to burn down the system based on false claims. Oh, and since you specifically mentioned Detroit -- it is another of the cities that Trump did better (in terms of percentage of vote received) in 2020 than he did in 2016. So I guess the cheating in Detroit was to help Trump win, since Biden did "poorly" versus Hillary in 2016?
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,359
3,122
Minnesota
✟215,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,359
3,122
Minnesota
✟215,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Where might we find evidence of this?
If you want a play by play you could go back and review the election night coverage. I jumped channels, CNN and MSNBC were a couple of those I watched. Votes were coming in steadily, it looked like Trump was going to win, and suddenly the counts stopped coming in from a number of swing states. The big question in my mind was why the pause? They reported a water leak in Georgia had caused the delay. But the specifics changed. One story was a water main break in the ceiling. Another was a leaky pipe. Another a leaky toilet. Then eventually, I don't recall how many days later, they claimed there was no pause! It went from four hours to two hours to no delay! The last story I know of was there was a minor leak from a urinal that caused no delay. Republican observers had been told that the counting had stopped and they could go home. The next false story put out was that there was always an observer present. The famous recording of the room, with no observer, showed that too was a lie. If you want a snapshot of where the changing stories were on November 5, 2020 you can read the story below from the anti-Trump Atlanta Constitution.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fulton County Elections head Richard Barron said Wednesday that the pipe dumped a lot of water, soaking the carpeting and hampering work.
“It looked really like there was rain coming out of the ceiling and the entire carpeting was just covered in water,” he said. “There was no way to go in there and perform work.”
At first, the county elections staff reported it was a four-hour delay but then corrected themselves by saying it caused a two-hour delay.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
16,682
10,494
Earth
✟143,669.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
If you want a play by play you could go back and review the election night coverage. I jumped channels, CNN and MSNBC were a couple of those I watched. Votes were coming in steadily, it looked like Trump was going to win, and suddenly the counts stopped coming in from a number of swing states. The big question in my mind was why the pause? They reported a water leak in Georgia had caused the delay. But the specifics changed. One story was a water main break in the ceiling. Another was a leaky pipe. Another a leaky toilet. Then eventually, I don't recall how many days later, they claimed there was no pause! It went from four hours to two hours to no delay! The last story I know of was there was a minor leak from a urinal that caused no delay. Republican observers had been told that the counting had stopped and they could go home. The next false story put out was that there was always an observer present. The famous recording of the room, with no observer, showed that too was a lie. If you want a snapshot of where the changing stories were on November 5, 2020 you can read the story below from the anti-Trump Atlanta Constitution.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fulton County Elections head Richard Barron said Wednesday that the pipe dumped a lot of water, soaking the carpeting and hampering work.
“It looked really like there was rain coming out of the ceiling and the entire carpeting was just covered in water,” he said. “There was no way to go in there and perform work.”
At first, the county elections staff reported it was a four-hour delay but then corrected themselves by saying it caused a two-hour delay.
A personal memoir and an article that says President Trump didn’t have any “evidence” (either) is your “evidence”?
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,066
4,740
✟839,713.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
New Hampshire was viewed as a must-win for the Haley campaign after the former South Carolina governor spent more than $31,000,000 in the Granite State. She also devoted significant time and effort to rallies in the state.
Despite significant effort and help from Democrat voters, the race was called for former President Trump less than a half hour after polls closed.
I think Nikki will stay in through the next primary, her home state of South Carolina.
or even Super Tuesday.

Trump can't possibly win with only say 70% of total Republicans supporting him.
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,066
4,740
✟839,713.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I did not hear anyone predict Haley would win in New Hampshire, only that she'd show a bit better than Iowa.
Agreed.

However, all the analysis for months has said, barring a criminal conviction, Trump would win if he won Iowa and NH. No state is a better state for Haley than NH. Haley is staying in to continue to show that Trump has the vote of maybe only 70% or so of primary voters. The more she stays in, the less likely it is that trump wins in the fall. Many of her voters will vote for Biden; many more will stay home.

The real question will be in November. Will the MAGA vote be great enough to elect Trump, or not?
=====================
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,359
3,122
Minnesota
✟215,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Agreed.

However, all the analysis for months has said, barring a criminal conviction, Trump would win if he won Iowa and NH. No state is a better state for Haley than NH. Haley is staying in to continue to show that Trump has the vote of maybe only 70% or so of primary voters. The more she stays in, the less likely it is that trump wins in the fall. Many of her voters will vote for Biden; many more will stay home.

The real question will be in November. Will the MAGA vote be great enough to elect Trump, or not?
=====================
Without a change of venue I expected a criminal conviction which would ultimately be struck down by a higher court, perhaps the Supreme Court. But Trump would not win on appeal until after the election. The big money is flowing into taking out Trump, Kari Lake, and as many others who would confront corruption before the election. Yet I think more and more people want to make America great every day, they see the prices at the grocery stores and illegals being given more privileges than American citizens and cities being given over to the thugs and homeless. No one can say for sure whether there will be enough MAGAs by election day.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
7,589
2,439
Massachusetts
✟98,686.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The real question will be in November. Will the MAGA vote be great enough to elect Trump, or not?
=====================
Doesn't seem likely. After all, let's not forget, Trump has never won the popular vote. He managed to secure enough electoral votes in 2016, but more people voted for Hilary than for Trump.

-- A2SG, and the fact that he won in some swing states could be attributed more to Anti-Hilary votes than Pro-Trump...he won't get that this time around...
 
Upvote 0