The light travel time problem

tdidymas

Newbie
Aug 28, 2014
2,323
998
Houston, TX
✟163,485.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
If we apply what we know of physical light to Gen 1:3 and following verses we get mired pretty fast...so I suggest we understand it as allusions to something else.

Genesis 1:3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness.

WoW - light with no darkness... IF this light is the visible light our eyes can see, then by making it, it creates its own darkness...How can light be not separated from darkness or how can it be so separated if it wasn't already separated by its creation? Can this really apply to visible light? Doesn't sound like light we know, does it?

So, was GOD doing tricks with visible light or does this point to something else?

1 John 1:5 This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all.
Does "GOD is light" refer to a visible glow or shine like a star or sun? This is weird stuff right? Does “Let there be light,” mean HE self created HIMself? Well of course not, so light is a characteristic of GOD, a divine attribute:

1 John 1:5 And this is the message we have heard from Him and announce to you: God is light, and in Him there is no darkness at all.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible
That God is light - Light, in the Scriptures, is the emblem of purity, truth, knowledge, prosperity, and happiness - as darkness is of the opposite. John here says that "God is light" - φῶς phōs - not the light, or a light, but light itself; that is, he is himself all light, and is the source and fountain of light in all worlds. He is perfectly pure, without any admixture of sin. He has all knowledge, with no admixture of ignorance on any subject. He is infinitely happy, with nothing to make him miserable. He is infinitely true, never stating or countenancing error; he is blessed in all his ways, never knowing the darkness of disappointment and adversity.

Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
...that is, as light is opposed to the darkness of sin; he is pure and holy in his nature and works, and of such pure eyes as not to behold iniquity; and so perfectly holy, that angels cover their times before him, when they speak of his holiness:

Vincent's Word Studies
God is Light (Θεὸς φῶς ἐστὶν)
A statement of the absolute nature of God. Not a light, nor the light, with reference to created beings, as the light of men, the light of the world, but simply and absolutely God is light, in His very nature. Compare God is spirit, and see on John 4:24 : God is love, 1 John 4:8, 1 John 4:16. The expression is not a metaphor. "All that we are accustomed to term light in the domain of the creature, whether with a physical or metaphysical meaning, is only an effluence of that one and only primitive Light which appears in the nature of God" (Ebrard). Light is immaterial, diffusive, pure, and glorious. It is the condition of life.


People's New Testament
John 1:5 This then is the message which we have heard of him. The message heard from Christ, now declared, is that God is light. The source whence all light, whether it be physical, or moral, or spiritual, comes ; the Enlightener of the universe. The term denotes luminous clearness, the free and benevolent source from whence flow light, intelligence, purity and blessing, absolutely free from alien intermixture, since in him there is no darkness at all. Light represents truth, knowledge and holiness. Darkness represents ignorance, error, falsehood and sin.

In terms used by the Scripture to define LIGHT in other places, this would mean that GOD created goodness and separated it from evil…

LIGHT IS FAITH:
LIGHT is the moral attribute of goodness, a life by faith unto righteousness while darkness is evil, rejecting GOD by faith unto death. And in Gen 1:4 GOD separated between them: Genesis 1:4 God saw that the light was good, and HE separated the light from the darkness.

This suggests that ALL people created in HIS image already existed by the end of verse 2 or between the verses and speaks to the free will decision that was the separation between all those who accepted YHWH as their GOD (becoming HIS elect) and those who rejected HIM as a liar and a false god, becoming condemned at this time.

So might not Genesis 1:3 read: And God said, “Let there be light,” [ie faith unto righteousness] and there was light [faith]. 4 God saw that the light [faith] was good, and he separated the light from the darkness [evil, rejecters, antagonists to HIS will].

FAITH BY FREE WILL:
Pre-conception existence theology contends that HE did this by asking for our true free will decisions to either accept HIS purpose for our creation or by rejecting that purpose because we thought HE was a false god, unable to fulfill his warnings of the consequences, and we did not have to bow to anyone. The separation was finalized by the election of the sons of light to HIS eternal church while He left the dark to their chosen perdition.

To ensure that none of HIS newly elected church would be destroyed by sin, HE gave us all the gospel promise that if any of HIS elect should rebel against HIS will and chose to become evil in HIS sight that though that would put them outside of HIS will, it would not put them outside of HIS grace nor love and that HE would always do what was necessary to bring them back to HIM in accord with their first true free will decision.
Please stick to the OP question.
 
Upvote 0

tdidymas

Newbie
Aug 28, 2014
2,323
998
Houston, TX
✟163,485.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Why are you believing science over the Bible. that is believing that there is an outer space where stars are suppose to be trillions + light years away.

If you believe that you will be confused about the creation God created and that is recorded in the Bible.
Right, and the Earth is flat.
 
Upvote 0

tdidymas

Newbie
Aug 28, 2014
2,323
998
Houston, TX
✟163,485.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
The speed of light is based on theory and this theory is applied to the universe (so vast we can't comprehend it) as a whole, we are not able to observe the entire universe .... leaves a lot of things in question scientifically .... many scientific theories out there about it. Which ... if any are absolutely correct? Who knows? ;o)

Is using the speed of light for measuring distance an absolute in measuring the universe?
The problem with this hypothesis is that it doesn't work in real life. The speed of light is a measured quantity. To claim that it's impossible to measure in one direction means that it's impossible to discern how far something is away from us, or how much time it takes for light to travel, is nonsense. It's simple arithmetic to say that light travelling from A to B is 1/2 the time it takes for that same light to travel from A to B and back to A, and this is a measured quantity.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Job 33:6
Upvote 0

tdidymas

Newbie
Aug 28, 2014
2,323
998
Houston, TX
✟163,485.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Don’t be a fool yourself @tdidymas believe God not the atheist.
The wisdom of God is foolishness to man and the wisdom of man is foolishness to God. But God is more wise. It all depends on Who you believe.
If you don't understand the question, please don't attempt to answer it.
 
Upvote 0

tdidymas

Newbie
Aug 28, 2014
2,323
998
Houston, TX
✟163,485.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Others have answered the question quite nicely, but I'll add my own perspective.

1. Truth.

God cannot lie.​

Numbers 23:19 God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?

Titus 1:2 In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began.

Hebrews 6:13-14,18 For when God made promise to Abraham, because he could swear by no greater, he sware by himself, Saying, Surely blessing [1] I will bless thee , and multiplying [2] I will multiply thee ... That by two immutable things [promises, as numbered, above], in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us.
2. The knowledge of the world.

Scripture warns us about the knowledge of the world.​

2 Timothy 3:7 Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.

Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

1 Corinthians 3:19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

1 Corinthians 2:4-5 And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.

1 Corinthians 1:19-21 For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent. Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

2 Timothy 4:3-4 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
3. Faith.

Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

Hebrews 11:3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

Hebrews 11:6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.

Conclusion:

Q: how [sic] to resolve the light travel time problem?
A: The answer is to not ask the question in the first place.
Your answer doesn't help. I agree with what scripture says. I agree with believing that God doesn't lie. But it seems as if you don't understand the question. Let me put it to you another way:

IF God created the universe 6k years ago, and
IF the radius of the universe is at least 14B light years,
THEN the fact that we are seeing supernova events up to 10B light years away, GOD IS LYING.

If there is integrity in your words, then what you SAY and what you DO match perfectly according to reality and justice. The universe, and what we observe in it is reality, and shows what God has DONE. Therefore what He SAYS in the Bible has to measure up to the reality of what is observed. If Jesus told someone to "take up your mat and walk," and that person couldn't do it, then we wouldn't believe anything He said, would we?

Therefore, can you see a discrepancy between what is observed in the universe, and the 6k year old universe claimed by the traditional interpretation of Gen. 1?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: FaithT
Upvote 0

tdidymas

Newbie
Aug 28, 2014
2,323
998
Houston, TX
✟163,485.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I believe it is like the rivers God created. He never started by pouring water on the distant mountains and they eventually run to the sea. He made them in an instant. So it is with the lights in the sky.
You don't understand the question. Please reread the OP and try to understand what I'm asking.
 
Upvote 0

tdidymas

Newbie
Aug 28, 2014
2,323
998
Houston, TX
✟163,485.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
An astronomical event that occurred light years away such as the remnants of a supernova might be seen in the night time sky as if it is today, while it happened years ago.

Paul wrote in Romans 3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

Paul wrote his thoughts more than 1900 years ago, yet the reader might find his words today. In as much as all humans have erred and the Bible was written by human hands, it falls short of the glory of God. The wisdom given to men to seek the Lord after the teachings of Jesus has a chance, while worshipping the Bible falls short of perfection.
Do you understand the question?
 
Upvote 0

tdidymas

Newbie
Aug 28, 2014
2,323
998
Houston, TX
✟163,485.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Just my thoughts on SN1987A, FWIW:

SN1987A: A blue supergiant star, created in BC4004 in the hollow of God's hand for the angel Sanduleak, i.e. his home. SN1987A was then 'ballooned' to the distance of 168,000 light years distance from the earth, with its starlight kept intact on the earth, when God stretched the universe.

Psalm 104:2b who stretchest out the heavens like a curtain:

Circa 2300 B.C., Sanduleak leaves his home and comes to earth and marries a woman here; settling down and having [giant] children.

God destroys the world with a global flood and confines Sanduleak to:

Jude 6: And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

God then destroys Sanduleak's home (the supergiant star), circa 2345 B.C. and moves the light from its destruction across space for "discovery" on 23 February 1987.
Are you serious about this nonsense, or are you being sarcastic?
 
Upvote 0

tdidymas

Newbie
Aug 28, 2014
2,323
998
Houston, TX
✟163,485.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
How do you know God did not create Adam with scars?

But whether he did or not is irrelevant. God can make a thing to appear aged any way he wishes to. But, in fact, God can do both and not be lying. As I have said in another forum, here we mere humans are coming up with time manipulation thoughts and semi-cogent theories, and we congratulate ourselves on our cleverness, yet we can't allow God, (who invented time), to do what he wishes with it, but call him a liar if he does?

I said God can do both. We pretty much all agree time is relative. And science concurs: For the person who travels, the time he takes to do so is literally less than the time passed by the one who sits waiting for him to return. When I think of the expansion of space-time at the Big Bang, (though most people disagreed with me here, I'm not sure they understood what I was trying to say), I don't see why not from one POV it could take 6K years, and from another take 15 billion.

As I said at first, though, there's nothing stopping God from giving the universe the appearance of 15 billion years, without it being a lie. It is not he who said it was 15 billion years old.
Analogy: I see a house that has peeling paint, roof damage, and other things that indicate it has a 20 year or more history. But you tell me it was built last year. What do you think I'm going to believe?
 
Upvote 0

tdidymas

Newbie
Aug 28, 2014
2,323
998
Houston, TX
✟163,485.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
First, I think it dangerous to put science before the Bible...so your statement show me a scientific reason as to why creation should be taken as literal days is deeply flawed from a religious point of view.

I have answered this question at length in another thread the O.P is familiar with but am not one who has responded with any sarcasm (I am not sure on which forum that happened)

The short answer is this...
Satan tempts us in the dimension of our minds...this is not just in the physical senses of touch, hearing, taste and smell (which are bound to this earth essentially).
If Satan can attack other senses such as feeling and sight (things we cannot touch or smell) where in the Bible does it say that Satan cannot also distort our perception of the speed of light with regards to supernovas exploding?
Saying God cast him to the earth is true, however adding to this by stating God does not allow him to also influence our perceptions of space is very dangerous ground.
It is my view that sin reaches as far out into the universe as thought does and Satan therefore has influence to that extent.
Why do I say this?
Because we know that other worlds also had the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. They all face that same temptation Eve did.
Now if we say they are all watching this battle on this world between good and evil, then we cannot deny that Satan is also tempting them too.

As I responded in the other post about this, my question is not about time when talking about supernovas. My question would be if God created that part of the universe perfect and if sin does not reach that far out into space, then why would God create a sun that explodes in the first place? This is why I consider the theory that "sin extends as far into space as thought and sight" and that (Satan's ability to influence/corrupt light) explains the 167,000 light year supernova issue.
I disagree with your idea, because I believe God is in control of all things, not Satan. The only control Satan has is over unregenerate people who can't (and won't) stop sinning. Anything Satan does he has to have God's permission, and Satan is not an omnipotent being. Therefore I don't believe that Satan is the one creating supernova appearances. If you want to believe that, it's your prerogative. But it's pure speculation. I'm talking about things measurable and observable. So in my mind, your hypothesis isn't viable.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
According to you, I'm not a believer because I don't interpret Gen. 1 in accordance with your opinion or how you judge it. Your analogy about what Jesus did is a straw man argument, and has nothing to do with my question. I agree that God created the universe. I also agree with the apostle Paul that things about God can be known by what He has made.

So here's the question for you: can you see a difference between God creating something instantaneously, and God creating a history of something instantaneously?

Hi tdidymas,

Well, do you believe God's account of the creation?

My answer to your question: No. I've never considered God, or anyone for that matter, being able to create history, unless we're talking about the holocaust deniers and the moon landing deniers who just want to deny history as recorded, is really history as it unfolded. I mean history, is the collection of facts that actually surrounded a time or event in the past. Now, people can, as I say make up a fake history, but that's not 'creating a history of something instantaneously'. That's creating a fictitious account.

God bless,
Ted
 
Upvote 0

AdamjEdgar

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2021
449
139
52
Melbourne
✟17,432.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I disagree with your idea, because I believe God is in control of all things, not Satan. The only control Satan has is over unregenerate people who can't (and won't) stop sinning. Anything Satan does he has to have God's permission, and Satan is not an omnipotent being. Therefore I don't believe that Satan is the one creating supernova appearances. If you want to believe that, it's your prerogative. But it's pure speculation. I'm talking about things measurable and observable. So in my mind, your hypothesis isn't viable.

Oh dear oh dear oh dear...that is so very wrong. You are basing your belief on a misunderstanding of the doctrine of sin.
Our efforts to save ourselves are nothing but filthy rags. Your view that Satan has no control over non sinners is absolutely false. Jesus never sinned...not even a single time...Satan murdered him! The irony of this event was that the very people who had studied the gospel of the Old testament now believed that because Jesus died, he must not be the Messiah!
Satan absolutely has control of thoughts and interpretations...and this most definately does extend out into the universe (read the story of job)

Im sorry but what you said it a complete fallacy.

Edit...re the statement "where does the Bible say the tree of the knowledge of good and evil is on other worlds" are you not able to deduce from the story of job any reason why that tree was not also on other worlds God created?
The fact Satan is visiting the council containing other world members in the story of Job is evidence to support the belief that tree is also on other planets...as is the tree of life!
How do we know about the tree of life...read what God said in Genesis when he placed an angel at the entry to the garden of Eden after expelling Adam and Eve. ("Lest man eat of the tree and live forever")
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Freth

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 11, 2020
1,513
1,828
Midwest, USA
✟381,231.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Your answer doesn't help. I agree with what scripture says. I agree with believing that God doesn't lie. But it seems as if you don't understand the question. Let me put it to you another way:

IF God created the universe 6k years ago, and
IF the radius of the universe is at least 14B light years,
THEN the fact that we are seeing supernova events up to 10B light years away, GOD IS LYING.

If there is integrity in your words, then what you SAY and what you DO match perfectly according to reality and justice. The universe, and what we observe in it is reality, and shows what God has DONE. Therefore what He SAYS in the Bible has to measure up to the reality of what is observed. If Jesus told someone to "take up your mat and walk," and that person couldn't do it, then we wouldn't believe anything He said, would we?

Therefore, can you see a discrepancy between what is observed in the universe, and the 6k year old universe claimed by the traditional interpretation of Gen. 1?

Genesis 1:21-22 seems to indicate that God had to have created all living things as mature/adults (like Adam and Eve were), because He told them to be fruitful and multiply right after being created. This shows that God created all things with a specific age from the outset.

Further evidence: The sun didn't go through the long process to become the star it is today. The moon didn't form from natural processes. Both were created and placed with intent and purpose. Jupiter, for instance, acts like a vacuum cleaner, sucking up space debris. It was placed there with intent and purpose.

Celestial observations were foretold by scripture.

In the creation account:​

Genesis 1:14-19 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good. And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.​

In the end time:​

Matthew 24:29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken.

Luke 21:25 And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring.

Mark 13:25 And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken.
Conclusion:
  • God created all things with a certain age, according to His purpose.
  • God designed that stars would give signs at given points in time, to further His purpose.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AdamjEdgar

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2021
449
139
52
Melbourne
✟17,432.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The problem with this hypothesis is that it doesn't work in real life. The speed of light is a measured quantity. To claim that it's impossible to measure in one direction means that it's impossible to discern how far something is away from us, or how much time it takes for light to travel, is nonsense. It's simple arithmetic to say that light travelling from A to B is 1/2 the time it takes for that same light to travel from A to B and back to A, and this is a measured quantity.
There is an error with your view on measuring the speed of light...we can only measure it in a single direction. It is not possible to place a synchronised measuring device on the other side of the universe to check that the return speed of light is identical to the sent speed of light. You assume that the universe is empty and without gravity. That is a big big problem...although not an argument I need to use. My argument has already been stated, not countered with any facts and so it does not need repeating at this point
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,148
51,515
Guam
✟4,910,162.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are you serious about this nonsense, or are you being sarcastic?
Is that why you asked this?
tdidymas said:
Again the question: how to resolve the light travel time problem?
Do you have a better answer?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AdamjEdgar

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2021
449
139
52
Melbourne
✟17,432.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Is that why you asked this?Do you have a better answer?
I agree with these points...to be honest, sometimes i wonder if certain names on this forum are not the same individual registered twice? For example, i have heard a different user who has similar views on topics such as this, using identical phrases ("strawman") to discount other individuals posts that he doesnt agree with. I will not go so far as to state categorically it is the same person, however clearly some collusion is in effect that is not interested in reasonable factual discussion.

I will simplify one question i do have regarding supernovas that I am certain is a question the O.P surely must also have on their mind...its not about time, rather, why would God in a perfect universe need to allow the destruction that Supernovas cause in the first place?

This is why:
- one of my solutions is that Satan's influence extends far out into the universe...far beyond just this earth.
- the alternative solution is that Satan is able to influence light travelling from supernovas to the earth such that we perceive time according to his own influence and not that of actual reality
- a third solution may just be that supernovas are not what we think they are?

In all honesty, it may very well be that we will never understand supernovas until we get to heaven and have the chance during the millenium and/or beyond to question our creator on such things.

None of the above changes my view about the writings of the Bible. There is no room in the original languages of the Bible to change it from a literal creation to a metaphorical one (or whatever). If Moses wrote, "In six days God created the Heavens and the Earth...and on the Seventh Day he rested and hallowed this day"...why should i take secular science "theories" (none of these are facts, only hypothesises and theories) over the writings of the bible? The answer is simple, I do not!

I am sorry to burst the bubbles of individuals who think its ok to start unravelling writings of the bible, however, the bible is like a mouse trap. Its parts are all vitally important in ensuring that it remains functional. Take even the smallest one away and the device fails.

Even small doctrinal errors in the bible cause significant issues down the track in other areas of its writings. A number of denominations have gone to great lengths to alter the meanings of some of its basic writings in order to further their own non biblical doctrines...to the extent that in the end what they have done is to create a massive codex of inexplicable inconsistencies throughout their belief structure...the original white lie requires extensive and ongoing lying in order to prevent the complete breakdown of belief (JW's and Mormons are a classic example of this in writing their own bibles etc).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,148
51,515
Guam
✟4,910,162.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I will simplify one question i do have regarding supernovas that I am certain is a question the O.P surely must also have on their mind...its not about time, rather, why would God in a perfect universe need to allow the destruction that Supernovas cause in the first place?
By destroying their homes, God sends a clear message to other angels who may be contemplating following Satan.
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
13,180
5,695
68
Pennsylvania
✟792,053.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Because we know that other worlds also had the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. They all face that same temptation Eve did.

We know this how???
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Job 33:6
Upvote 0

AdamjEdgar

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2021
449
139
52
Melbourne
✟17,432.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
By destroying their homes, God sends a clear message to other angels who may be contemplating following Satan.

My understanding is that in fact many of the angels who originally joined with Lucifer in the first war in heaven, changed their minds prior to his being cast down to this earth. If memory serves me correct, i believe originally about half the angels in heaven sided with him, however, only 1/3 were cast down to the earth along with Satan (correct my poor memory if necessary)

I would be doubtful that God would allow the game to play out on earth in full view of the rest of the universe, and then go blowing up the homes of protesting angels to stop them also joining satan's campaign. Having said that, we know that in Noahs day people were laughing at him saying "God would never destroy the earth with a flood, it hasnt even ever rained before!"

One could argue that the war in heaven started billions of years ago...i accept that because 1 year on earth is but a day in heaven, it could be perceived that timeline is possible. However, i think its unlikely. God simply cannot co-exist with evil. This would have come to a head quickly. The problem is, how can we put a timeline on the infiniteness of God and the universe? In infinite terms where God is timeless, what does the statement i made "something came to a head quickly" even mean?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Sophrosyne

Let Your Light Shine.. Matt 5:16
Jun 21, 2007
163,213
64,206
In God's Amazing Grace
✟903,022.00
Faith
Christian
If God can create stars by the trillions and beyond numbers imaginable could he not create photons everywhere in the universe that look like streams from each star? In other words (I'm not a YEC) it is quite possible to create things to the light from them is already there the instant they are created and has not necessarily been traveling for billions of years to get here if the earth is 6k to 10k years old then the light created 10k years ago will be that far along from the star while the light that was 10k years away created then will arrive. One also has to realize that Adam and Eve spent an undetermined time in the garden and likely time didn't start till they sinned there was no need to consider how long things have been going when they are still immortal. It is possible the garden was located in another dimension or they were there for a million years as when you are fellowshipping with God constantly time can pass like it does in his domain a day is 1000 years with God if Adam was in the garden alone for 1000 years then with God it could be 1 million years and when Eve was made they could have been together for another 1000 years in God's time. The Bible also doesn't take into account that when the universe was created time for it had to also be created and I doubt even the most smartest man we have can tell you how to create time and what happens to it when it "starts" Does time accelerate light from 0 to 186k miles per second on light or does it take longer or shorter? As you are creating time if you aren't in a world that has finished time that have been totally created or is it in progress. In other words it is possible time at the start of the universe was not constant as in the Bible we see in a place God may have actually stopped time for parts of the universe when the sun stood still. As God is the author of the laws of the universe which he created those laws may not have all sprung into existed in what we consider zero time (instant).

Many people assume God and the unvierse have to obey the laws of it as we know it but if God can live outside of the universe and interact with it then logic could reason he is not subject to the laws if he desires not to.
 
Upvote 0