Latest activity Postings About Inventory
-
-
tdidymas replied to the thread AZUZA STREET. REVIVAL OR NOT ?.You're exaggerating. I took my definition from the references to sin in the Bible, with related terms: transgression, iniquity, guilt... -
What does Scripture say and do your practices align with Scripture? (That's the real question!) I know modern pentecostalism tells...
-
tdidymas replied to the thread AZUZA STREET. REVIVAL OR NOT ?.Pardon me for butting in, as this thread caught my eye. You're right, that definition of sin is defective. I think from my knowledge of...
-
tdidymas replied to the thread AZUZA STREET. REVIVAL OR NOT ?.The same man who wrote Rom. 8:2 also wrote 8:10 "And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life...
-
So allow me to request a clarification: You believe that you don't sin? (And he with an "argument" is not at the mercy of someone...
-
tdidymas replied to the thread AZUZA STREET. REVIVAL OR NOT ?.If someone says that the "revival" at Azusa St. was fake, and today's "tongues" is fake, and another person says "you're blaspheming the...
-
tdidymas replied to the thread AZUZA STREET. REVIVAL OR NOT ?.That verse (1 Cor. 14:2) is in the context of the Corinthian church, where what was spoken in an "unknown" language was unknown to the...
-
These are the same as my findings into the subject of 'speaking in tongues'. You are correct, New Testament tongues were, known human...
-
This doctrine needs to be compared against Scripture in knowing what tongues actually were in the 1st century. The experiential...
-
tdidymas replied to the thread On the meaning and applicability of 1 Timothy 2:12-14.How can you claim that 1 Tim. 2:12-14 is for "life in general"? Paul is writing to Timothy in the role of church leadership, and the...
-
tdidymas replied to the thread THE BLOOD IS REMOVED IN THE NEW BIBLES.Your attitude blinds you to the truth. It appears all you want to do is argue, so I'm done here.
-
tdidymas replied to the thread THE BLOOD IS REMOVED IN THE NEW BIBLES."The blood of Christ" is in this verse in all of the manuscripts, both earliest and latest, which is proof that a scribe did not add...
-
tdidymas replied to the thread THE BLOOD IS REMOVED IN THE NEW BIBLES.Your objection is ludicrous! Can you find the term "trinity" anywhere in scripture? According to your logic, you can't believe that the...
-
tdidymas replied to the thread THE BLOOD IS REMOVED IN THE NEW BIBLES.Sorry for the confusion, I meant Rom. 5:9, which in the NIV says, "Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we...
-
tdidymas replied to the thread THE BLOOD IS REMOVED IN THE NEW BIBLES.Does Col. 1:14 say it is without the blood of Christ? Absolutely not! Then how are we redeemed, unless it is by the blood of Christ, as...
-
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
