I have no problem with the pleasing God part. My statement was about pleasing others. What generally goes on in most churches is the enforcement of unwritten and unquestioned practices of law if not the law. Here what is happening is some are trying to enforce the law the Christian has no obligation to. Yes murder, adultery, lying etc are unquestionably wrong (sin). I don't think anyone here is promoting those things. I know I'm not promoting sin. It's a back unguarded door approach to enforce the law. I've seen the statement here "there's no such thing as obedience by incidence." You can't prove obedience to something by incidence. Paul said even the gentiles who have not the law prove what God has imprinted on the soul recognizing things as wrong (sin).
Romans 2
14 For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
15 Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;
Now you said something about restore His wayward creation. May I ask restored to what? I've no problem with it requiring faith.
It was already part of my statement: restored to
justice. IOW, God's plan has never been to suddenly decide to no longer care if man resides in a state of justice or righteousness, living according to the internal natural law that he created man to have to begin with. Sin is an anomaly, out of sync with the rest of creation. God didn't create man to sin. We need to nail that fact down first of all.
Now God doesn't ask us, with the New Covenant, to present ourselves to Him spotless and sinless in order to be just, in order to be saved, as if we could accomplish that on our own. Rather God now tells us that
He, alone
, justifies man. The first right order of things for man is to simply be in communion with God, ‘apart from Whom we can do nothing’ (John15:5). Adam broke that relationship; he essentially rejected God
as his God. All other sin that followed flows from that first breach with our Creator, that first basic denial of His authority. So the first step in restoring man to the heights from which he fell is to reconcile him with God. That's why Jesus came, to restore knowledge of the true God and win reconciliation with Him, with
Himself, by dying the death that sin should earn for us. Now we rise to life with Him, but to a new life. Sins are forgiven, we’re new creations, and we’re to ‘go, and sin no more’.
So while the Law can justify no one, we’re nevertheless
judged by the Law as per Rom 2. This is because the Law is right on as the standard-holy and spiritual and good as Scripture tells us-showing us the right way for man (this Law, involving the 10 commandments, is referred to by Paul in Rom 7:7-12 and Rom 13:8-10). The problem is that man cannot live up to or fulfill it on His own, apart from God. It can only be fulfilled by the Spirit IOW; it’s only fulfilled as we possess the virtue of love which is realized in us by God to the extent that we’re in communion with Him. This is how He ‘places His Law in our minds and writes it on our hearts’.
And this
must be the case-sinners don’t enter heaven. Again, God’s purpose is to justify man by
making us just, not solely by attributing or declaring or imputing justice to us, attractive as that may sound if we prefer no obligation whatsoever. But Jesus’s burden is light, not non-existent.
Anyway, we have on this thread differences of opinion regarding how to view man’s obligation to be righteous. Is it non-existent for believers-already a done deal for those who have faith? Or do righteous deeds happen automatically, necessarily, by those who truly believe? Do we have some obligation, some part to play, in striving for and achieving righteousness, perhaps even increasing in it, even if we cannot even begin to walk this road until God places us on it first? Is man’s will involved at all? In my understanding God desires man to be increasingly, personally involved in working out his salvation, in retaining and increasing his righteousness by accepting it, by cooperating with God in achieving it. God
draws us into this willingness, but without force-we can always say “no” at any step along the way. The Parable of the Talents addresses this dynamic well.
Anyway, I think this needs to be thoughtfully ironed out. Right living or behavior cannot be separated from righteousness itself as if faith were some sort of stand-in for righteousness rather than the means to it, the
necessary means to it. We must still choose good over evil, life over death. Good and evil will always need to be separated, as per Isaiah 5:20
Sorry-a bit wordy