We can, indeed, limit God.
"And Jesus could there do no might miracles, because of their unbelief." Matthew 8?
Also, I want to say Psalm 78, but, David pointed out that the Exodus losers, Israeli, that is, 'limited the Holy One of Israel." Not a good thing to do.
Best wishes,
goldenboy
I think that Jesus' rejection at Nazareth didn't mean that he couldn't do miracles, as if he lacked the ability, but that he couldn't do any mighty works because of their hostility.
Matt 13:57-58 And they took offense at him. But Jesus said to them, "A prophet is not without honor except in his own country and in his own house." And he did not do many mighty works there, because of their unbelief.
Mark 6:4-5 And Jesus said to them, "A prophet is not without honor, except in his own country, and among his own kin, and in his own house." And he could do no mighty work there, except that he laid his hands upon a few sick people and healed them.
First, and most important, is to realize that this passage is NOT about Jesus' ability to heal or not. The point of the passage is Jesus' rejection by the home crowd, so pulling things out of the passage that the author was not intending to communicate is speculative from the start and any further speculation beyond the authors point shouldn't fail to account for the main point of the passage. Secondly, it's important to realize that this story of Jesus' rejection by the home crowd occurs in all 3 synoptic gospels, so any adequate exegesis or theory will account for all three retellings of the story.
Notably, Luke 4 tells of Jesus' rejection at Nazareth, but says nothing about Jesus' lack of healing there. Luke's version is important because Luke doesn't seem to care about Jesus' healing/not-healing in Nazareth. For him, the point of the story (in keeping with the point of Matthew and Mark) is Jesus' rejection by the village. In Luke's version we also have additional information about Jesus' encounters with the village, because in Luke, the people aren't just openly offended or merely hostile to Jesus, they try to kill him!
Matthew and Mark are very similiar. The point is still, like Luke, Jesus' rejection by the Nazareth village. Regarding Jesus' healings/not-healings in Nazareth, Matthew phrases things differently than Mark. Matthew says that Jesus did not do many works there because of the people's "unbelief". Mark, on the other hand, says that Jesus could do no might work there because of their unbelief. What Mark DOESNT say is that He didn't have the ability to do mighty works, in fact, Mark reports Jesus healing people in Nazareth!
So what's going on here? The point is that the people in Nazareth were rejecting Jesus. That is the authors intent in the passage. He didn't do many things there, not because of their lack of mental assent to his message, but because of their open hostility toward him. If Jesus had done many mighty works there, they would have probably killed him as Luke says they were ready to do after Jesus insults them in the synagogue. This doesn't speak to Jesus' ability, or lack thereof, because of the metal state of the people (as if their mental states had a causal affect on the power God has), but it speaks toward Jesus' wisdom, discretion, and His ultimate goals. Jesus didn't do anything in Nazareth because of lack of loyalty of Jesus' hometown toward him and their open hostility.
In the broader context of the gospel stories, it certainly doesn't appear that the people of Nazareth limited God's power at all since He accomplished exactly what He intended to from the start. Had the people of Nazareth really limited God's power, then the cross would not have occured. In the gospel stories, for the people of Nazareth to limit God's power (and his demonstration of it), they would have killed Jesus, thrown him in prison, submitted to him, or something else that somehow stopped the cross from occuring.
To say that the Nazareth people limited God's power due to their lack of belief is to read into this passage something that Matthew, Mark, and Luke were not interested in communicating at all.