The big bang! or was it?

paulnoel

Grace and peace be yours in abundance!!!
Apr 5, 2005
1,434
193
Cambridge UK
✟10,032.00
Faith
Salvation Army
Marital Status
Married
I once asked someone did God make the earth and all the universe? No they said to me it was through the big bang.

So my question to this person was this, if I showed you a plate and said this plate made itself what would you say. And they said don't be so stupid how can a plate make itself. So I asked, what I want to know if something so simple as a plate can not make itself, then how can you beileve that something so coplext as the earth with all it's different species, the sun and the moon being in just the right place so we have day and night and all the other complecated things that are in the universe was made from a bit of rock exploding?
 

MuAndNu

Practical Atheist
Mar 29, 2004
2,077
23
68
✟2,347.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Republican
paulnoel said:
I once asked someone did God make the earth and all the universe? No they said to me it was through the big bang.

So my question to this person was this, if I showed you a plate and said this plate made itself what would you say. And they said don't be so stupid how can a plate make itself. So I asked, what I want to know if something so simple as a plate can not make itself, then how can you beileve that something so coplext as the earth with all it's different species, the sun and the moon being in just the right place so we have day and night and all the other complecated things that are in the universe was made from a bit of rock exploding?

Have you visited the Creation & Evolution forum. This kind of question is dealt with all the time over there.
 
Upvote 0

BOJAX

Vaccinated with a phonograph needle.
May 12, 2005
1,911
89
40
Toronto, Ontario
Visit site
✟2,542.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Greens
paulnoel said:
I once asked someone did God make the earth and all the universe? No they said to me it was through the big bang.

So my question to this person was this, if I showed you a plate and said this plate made itself what would you say. And they said don't be so stupid how can a plate make itself. So I asked, what I want to know if something so simple as a plate can not make itself, then how can you beileve that something so coplext as the earth with all it's different species, the sun and the moon being in just the right place so we have day and night and all the other complecated things that are in the universe was made from a bit of rock exploding?

:clap: noice!!:thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

David Gould

Pearl Harbor sucked. WinAce didn't.
May 28, 2002
16,931
514
53
Canberra, Australia
Visit site
✟29,118.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
AU-Labor
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Danhalen

Healing
Feb 13, 2005
8,098
471
49
Ohio
✟18,099.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Big Rob said:
Yeah, day and night are too complex for nature to explain. All in favor of invoking the day and night fairy explanation say Aye.
It is the day and night elves you moron. Anyone who believes otherwise is going to burn in Placko-Placko. Heathen!
 
Upvote 0

truthmonger89

Positive rate, gear up.
May 15, 2005
3,432
231
✟4,734.00
Faith
Atheist
paulnoel said:
I once asked someone did God make the earth and all the universe? No they said to me it was through the big bang.

So my question to this person was this, if I showed you a plate and said this plate made itself what would you say. And they said don't be so stupid how can a plate make itself. So I asked, what I want to know if something so simple as a plate can not make itself, then how can you beileve that something so coplext as the earth with all it's different species, the sun and the moon being in just the right place so we have day and night and all the other complecated things that are in the universe was made from a bit of rock exploding?

This looks like just another argument from design, so here we go again. OK, let's start with the plate and work backwards. A plate is so symmetrical and orderly, it obviously shows evidence of design. It could not have accidentally appeared or made itself, somebody else must have made it. Who made the plate? Humans did. Humans are very complex and orderly and obviously show evidence of design, and so is the entire universe we live in, so all of this could not have just appeared by accident. Some higher intelligence must have designed and created everything. What was it? Theists say God made everything. God is much more complex than the plate or the humans or the universe, he is so complex, intricate, organized, and purposeful, he could not have created himself or magically appeared out of nothing, he shows evidence of design. Uh-oh, we have a problem. Things that show evidence of design must have a designer. God is so complex, intricate, organized, and purposeful, he obviously shows evidence of design. There must be a higher intelligence than God which designed God. Then, that higher intelligence must have been designed by an even higher intelligence, ad infinitum.

If evidence of design requires a designer, how is God exempt from that conclusion? If you insist that God is eternal, that he always existed, that nothing else designed God, aren't you contradicting and thereby invalidating the original premise of your argument? Everything requires a designer, but not everything requires a designer? See what I mean? If you have no objections to simply saying that God always existed, and nothing else designed or made God in the first place, why couldn't you just say that about the universe? Really why not?

Even if Christians could successfully debunk the big bang theory, disproving one theory does not automatically make a competing theory valid. So stop wasting your time trashing the big bang and get busy explaining how God came to exist in the first place. Convince me.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Charlie V

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2004
5,559
460
58
New Jersey
✟16,611.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The big bang! or was it?


Bargainfluger said:
Yes, yes it was.

Hmm. Perhaps, but I like philosophy.

"Big" is relative.

Suppose, hypothetically, that the universe as we know it is contained in a much larger entity, one billions of times larger than the universe as we know it. For lack of a name, let's call this entity the "megaverse."

The megaverse consists of many thousands of universes, each of them having started with seperate and distinct "bangs."

The megaverse itself began with a much bigger bang, one so huge it dwarfed the minor bang that created this universe.

So perhaps, relative to the "Great Big Mombo-Bang" that created the megaverse, the Bang wasn't that Big.

Charlie ;)

PS:

How do scientists know what it might have sounded like? What if the universe was created by a Large Ker-Bloom!

Hehehe.. ;)
 
Upvote 0

Bargainfluger

Playin' in Joes Garage
Sep 14, 2004
1,353
99
MD
✟1,946.00
Faith
Atheist
Big Rob said:
Are you sure? It was neither big nor a bang.
Well, taking the two words separately, you're right. But he was referring to the cosmic theory, and no matter how misnamed it is, it is still the best, most plausible explanation we have at this time.


Well, at least it's close between BB and the gopher hole hypothesis...
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hydra009

bel esprit
Oct 28, 2003
8,593
371
41
Raleigh, NC
✟18,036.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Late_Cretaceous said:
You seem to have confused science with athiesm.
It's kind of flattering actually, until one realizes that these people are trying to malign science through the association, then it isn't so flattering.
 
Upvote 0